acr731
Jerry learned to GM from Pee Wee Herman
- Messages
- 8,653
- Reaction score
- 24,075
I’ve seen a lot of “we shouldn’t have paid him” talk and I’m genuinely curious as to what you resident CowboysZone GM’s would’ve done. He’s a top 10 QB. The way the market works is the next man up in that top 10ish bracket gets a top contract. He’s the 4th highest paid right now, in two years he’ll be the 8th or 9th. He’s not the highest paid QB forever. His teammates adore him there’s no way not signing him would go over well in the locker room. I don’t see any scenario where we let him go and are 10-4 at this point in the season.
What would’ve been y’all’s alternative? A rookie QB and miss out on the next best thing since LT? Try to sell the farm to Seattle when they obviously weren’t interested in trading away their only hope for winning football?
Seriously, what would y’all have done this offseason if you cut the chord on Dak?
This sounds too much like the people who wanted to keep Garrett and kept saying "who do we replace him with"? Garrett sucked and Dak isn't playing anywhere close to earning what he is paid.
There is no alternative right now - we get that. But that doesn't mean Dallas should ignore the fact that Dak isn't playing worth a crap and maybe they should start looking for another QB in the next draft or in 2023.
Last edited: