Twitter: DeMarcus Lawrence isn’t going anywhere

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,278
Reaction score
14,179
I don't think so. Quinn seems to want to play more of a 3-4 front on running downs and 4-3 nickel. Miller would be a good fit for that, with Parsons at the other OLB/DE spot.

whether 3-4 or 4-3 .. (which we really play more nickel than anything else) .... you have to have big men traffic interference vs the big bodies on the
other side of the line. ..probably a reason why we keep getting 'Out Physical " vs run
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
38,195
Reaction score
35,246
whether 3-4 or 4-3 .. (which we really play more nickel than anything else) .... you have to have big men traffic interference vs the big bodies on the
other side of the line. ..probably a reason why we keep getting 'Out Physical " vs run

I think our primary problem on that is we keep trying to get by with bodies in the middle. Lawrence is a top-notch run stuffer at end, but that didn't stop teams from gouging us up the middle at times, even with Parsons at linebacker.
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,278
Reaction score
14,179
I think our primary problem on that is we keep trying to get by with bodies in the middle. Lawrence is a top-notch run stuffer at end, but that didn't stop teams from gouging us up the middle at times, even with Parsons at linebacker.

It's been average play at both DT and DE ..- Gholston ? ...Basham ?...Osa ? ..Watkins .. Bohanna .??
Even Gregory and Gallimore got wipe washed vs run in Niners playoff game - Trip part was we were supposed to have this galiant pass rush with Dlaw, Parsons
and Gregory yet we couldn't get near him vs pass.

IF we do not add significantly in offseason , ..why is it gonna be any different, any better next season ?
 

plymkr

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
14,418
I’ll be honest…I dislike Dlaws attitude more than his salary. He represents the trickle down from the FO of guys who talk too much and don’t do enough. It’s a leadership void that annoys me. Hope he’s gone
Bingo!!! I agree completely
 

Birch_Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
1,603
Gregory should be thankful the Cowboys stuck with him. I would have given up on his nonsense long ago.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,384
Reaction score
44,174
I know the team managed to go 7-3 without him (and Gregory) for a good part of the season. And that was without advanced planning and replacements.

And the team was 5-2 with him.

We’re talking about a DE not a QB, so bringing up W/L record with or without said player is misguided.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,095
Reaction score
4,434
It's been average play at both DT and DE ..- Gholston ? ...Basham ?...Osa ? ..Watkins .. Bohanna .??
Even Gregory and Gallimore got wipe washed vs run in Niners playoff game - Trip part was we were supposed to have this galiant pass rush with Dlaw, Parsons
and Gregory yet we couldn't get near him vs pass.

IF we do not add significantly in offseason , ..why is it gonna be any different, any better next season ?
To me the pass rush failed (v49ers) as we were actually hindered by lining up Micah as LB (and is one of the limitations having both DLaw and Gregory)....we became predictable and Jimmy G had that split second and had Micah in his sights.
You put Micah on the edge, you feel/sense the pressure before the play starts.
OK we acknowledge the pocket reducing attributes of DLaw, but it's slow and methodical power, for our D to work we need impact.
From memory/eye (and people only see and remember the latest travesty-49ers), our pass rush was a lot more dominant and effective when we were forced to play Micah/Gregory combo earlier in the season.
 

Majic

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,679
Reaction score
2,004
If you cannot stop the run, the nickel obviously becomes less important. If teams can run on use we won't be in nickel. A number 1 priority for our DEF has to be a run stuffer. I think we need to play 3-4 on running downs and look to recruit for this formation.

Also someone opposite Parsons as an OLB. Mack or Von Miller would have been great to see.

That would be my priorities.
 

fivetwos

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,488
Reaction score
26,463
+1

Gallup better not cost alot.
The team has all the leverage and watch them still get hosed. He is a Dallas draftee. The cheapness factor doesn't apply here.

If Gallup played for another team until now they would never even consider considering him.

It's not even known if he comes back a tick slower or not.

Best case, the upcoming season is a throwaway.

Oh but wait....the agent says he will be 100%??

Gotcha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,491
Reaction score
19,237
Here's another idea.

Release Cooper and DLAW. Let Gallup and Gregory walk. Resign Wilson and Hearse. I don't think we'll miss them much, and that's a lot of money either not being paid, or dropping off the cap. They're either injured or unimpressive. Replace them through FA and the draft.
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,278
Reaction score
14,179
To me the pass rush failed (v49ers) as we were actually hindered by lining up Micah as LB (and is one of the limitations having both DLaw and Gregory)....we became predictable and Jimmy G had that split second and had Micah in his sights.
You put Micah on the edge, you feel/sense the pressure before the play starts.
OK we acknowledge the pocket reducing attributes of DLaw, but it's slow and methodical power, for our D to work we need impact.
From memory/eye (and people only see and remember the latest travesty-49ers), our pass rush was a lot more dominant and effective when we were forced to play Micah/Gregory combo earlier in the season.

when you're facing a team known for it's zone run scheme, and Parsons is your best pursuit and tacklers, it makes all the more since to place him in the middle
of the action as possible ,.. i actually like Quinn having him in the middle and moving him around in according to how they want to attack the opposing offenses
passing game,.

i think many keep wanting to envision Parsons as in the same defensive role as TJ Watt, primarily permanent and full time on the outside, .. but that's a full time 3-4 scheme, .and we are not a 3-4 scheme, ..we are actually more of a nickel base scheme though we will give teams an early look as a 3 man front to get them
thinking 3 -4 ...
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,278
Reaction score
14,179
To me the pass rush failed (v49ers) as we were actually hindered by lining up Micah as LB (and is one of the limitations having both DLaw and Gregory)....we became predictable and Jimmy G had that split second and had Micah in his sights.
You put Micah on the edge, you feel/sense the pressure before the play starts.

OK we acknowledge the pocket reducing attributes of DLaw, but it's slow and methodical power, for our D to work we need impact.
From memory/eye (and people only see and remember the latest travesty-49ers), our pass rush was a lot more dominant and effective when we were forced to play Micah/Gregory combo earlier in the season.

- i've always felt that DLaw does his best work as a rusher, because he's a technician, he knows about leverage and a repertoire of moves, he has
above average athleticism but it's not near on the level of Gregory or Parsons, so he has to work that much harder.
But yet something is happening to where he just cannot generate the double digit sacks the team envisioned him to produce when they re-signed him
to that contract.

- Because of their natural athleticism, bend and burst, Quinn can enjoy moving Randy/Micah from one edge side to another with success, while
moving Dlaw inside as a situational nickel rusher works best, as he's not gonna beat many LT blockers, imo.

- Moving Parsons around, also allows him to come hot up the middle blitz, and most RBs simply cannot handle him.
 

Jimbo123

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,860
Reaction score
1,420
I do not do twitter.
However, if I come across a tweet as if in an article or see it somewhere. I click on the link in the web browser, copy, then paste in a post.
And it usually works.

Isn't that a copyright infraction ?
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,710
Reaction score
96,625
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Isn't that a copyright infraction ?

Don't think so, just posting a link. How else does anyone else do it. Same as posting a link for a photo from some website, or you tube.
Not making any money off of it.
If it is put out there for all to see, so harm in moving it forward.
 
Top