They Don t dump him . . . he has garnered a lot in those trades . its actually the opposite with him . . . teams really wanted himYeah, I can't figure out the reason teams are always dumping him. He must be some major locker room pariah or something. Maybe his cap hit is too big for his production?
Same w/ Mathieu. Produces everywhere, but no one wants to keep him.
here we go again you are giving up 2 for this guy we have Lamb and Gallup we don't need to give up a 2 when we can find a Wr3 at 3rd or 4th rounds. All those making a WR a priority is just overthinking. IMHO its not necessary not for what htown might want, that the rumor anyway. I might give up 3rd and a 7th for him but I rather go young and less cap hit.
The problem with this ..4th and a 7th. Speed we need.
they want a 2 and maybe more. i wont give more then a3rd and 7th really..Cook is a 4.33 guy who has posted over 1,000 yards receiving 6 out of 8 season and 46 TD. Having said that I would not give up a 1st rd pick for him.
If this has any truth to it, I can’t figure this organization out?
If this is true, then you just go sign Will Fuller.Only thing I can think of is that they think they need to get faster at WR.
I mean I wouldn't hate (nor would I love it) if they threw like a 6th round pick at the Texans for him. But I think I'd rather spent the cap space on other spots like OG or DT or DE.
Shoot, I'd rather spend it on Tyrann Mathieu.
Only thing I can think of is that they think they need to get faster at WR.
I mean I wouldn't hate (nor would I love it) if they threw like a 6th round pick at the Texans for him. But I think I'd rather spent the cap space on other spots like OG or DT or DE.
Shoot, I'd rather spend it on Tyrann Mathieu.
This. I'd take Will Fuller at 7-10 before I trade a high pick for Cooks and extend him.My question is ‘then what’?
Is he just a one year rental? If so, what’s the point?
Or are you then going to pay him even more money after the receiver market just exploded?
Neither of these options make sense to me.
Aww man. I can't wait to see him traded for peanuts just for us to say we offered a 7th!!!
These are the moves I just dont understand. You have Cooper set at $20 million for this and the next two seasons. So you don't want Cooper at $20 per ... but are interested in Cooks a $16.2? So you trade Cooper for a 5th ... then you're desperate for another receiver. So you likely send a higher pick to pick up Cooks. He then will then want paid again?
I just don't get it
This. I'd take Will Fuller at 7-10 before I trade a high pick for Cooks and extend him.
Only in Dallas. Trade your #1 for pennies .. then overpay to replace.The Cooper trade was not a financial decision. Dallas could've restructured his contract, like Cleveland did.
Jerry criticized Cooper publicly more than once last season and simply wanted him gone.
This. I'd take Will Fuller at 7-10 before I trade a high pick for Cooks and extend him.
Reports are they want a 2nd.Will Fuller has played 31 games in 4 years.
Cooks has played 61 in 4 years.
There's your answer.
And who said anything about high picks for Cooks? I mean I guess he could fetch that but I wouldn't want Dallas paying that. But if he could be had for a later round pick? I'd consider it.
Possibly, but how do you do outside stuff with Elliott?It's not out of the question to me (a better run game) .. it will be totally up to how and if we significantly upgrade at OL and blocking TE,.. and if our coaching makes a significant
step up in scheme and design, instead of the plain ole Jane predictable approach.
Cooper was a problem. That is why they got rid of him. I can't believe the number of people that don't get it. Getting rid of 3 unreliable knuckleheads isn't a bad thing. Gregory, Collins, and Cooper = Curley, Moe, and Larry.Keep the draft pick and restructure Cooper’s contract. Problem solved. Not that difficult.