I actually like Romo quite a bit. I disliked him some when he was playing because I routinely blamed him for the team's struggles. Looking back it's clear he was propping up some monumentally bad rosters and a terribly overrated idiot who should've never been HC. I do wonder about Romo walking away but the fact that he never played again aside from a bit where the DL never touched him is pretty telling.
This is me almost a 100% . . . watching the play clock go down to zero . . . use to frustrate the hell out of me (My name on the old site 31Hammer was banned after a drunken rant on Romo) . . . But then reports came out that Romo had to change all of Garrett's plays. . . Then things made a lot more sense.
But watching Him in 2014 as everything was coming together as far as that O Line was a turning point. . . He had achieved another level based upon that O Line.
In 2016 I was ecstatic to have Dak on the team and I was really impressed by Him because I never expect much from rookies . . . I am a firm believer in having a QB sit as I believe History proves me right.
I have said and always will say. . . A QB thrown to the wolves develops bad habits . . . A QB that gets to sit and watch benefits and is more likely to develop
For me sitting Dak was twofold . . . He needed to sit to learn and grow . . . And Tony needed to play because of his Experience and talent.
Injury is not a valid argument. . . . because anyone can be injured at any moment. . . . evendtont factor that in . . . and in addition to that basic argument . . . Tony was fit and ready to go.
Injury is a Talking Point the Mediots used to have a discussion to sell advertising.
But it sadly and even o this day has no bearing on the truth . . . It was used as an excuse to justify Dak over Tony
Which without that Talking Point makes absolutely no sense . . .
IT IS NONSENSICAL and only one way people can believe the Nonsensical . . . They must continue to lie to themselves
. Was better then Romo
