I agree on this . . . For the life of me I don't understand why they don't play Him there just fir that reason
I think Peters will be the starting LG next week and going forward.
We have peters to play l t.
He has plenty of burst. He needs a few holes to run through.
They find one and move him to tackle. Just like I wa Ted a tall corner for 10 years. We draft one and immediately move him to safety. Then in his last 2 years, we move him to corner and he shines.
I am 100% sure of it but I believe the run Game would be better with Smith there and we all know Peters can hold down tge Tackle spot
Exactly
I think the logic which I think is sound is you have vet that is savy between the 2 younger players that overall strengthens the line at 3 positions. Peters experience will help Biadasz and Smith identify things better with Peters between them.
I agree Rookie Smith is adequate at LT, the football that Peters has seen will benefit both Rookie Smith and the Center Biadasz.
I can see that logic . . . But I just feel Smith can get a better push and His fresh legs would be better at Pulling and that would benefit the Run Game more but I am happy the way they are lining up now
