Would you trade a 1st and Schultz for Pitts?

[JDSTAR]

Quite a bit far fetched, I admit, but would this not immediately improve our offense? All this speculation about getting a WR, but we have Washington coming back soon. If we’re looking to make that playoff run, I think Pitts would make more sense than any receiver on the block.

Again, a bit far fetched and would probably have to give even more draft capital for him than a 1st, but I believe he would be a huge game changer for our O. Thoughts?

 

[America's Cowboy]

Cowboys need a WR, not a TE. Plus, Schultz is Dak's security blanket, even if playing hurt. Rookies Ferguson and Hendershot are coming along nicely, but they lack the experience and security that Schultz provides for this Offense.

 

[Pompey-Cowboy]

No.

 

[NorthTexan95]

I think I would do that.

 

[Rayman70]

no. FIRST, we have a talented TE room even if we traded away Schultz, in Ferguson and Hendershot, McKean. Where would we fit him in at? There's 1 football guys.

 

[lukin2006]

No. Ferguson and Hendershot look like they can handle the job...

 

[Cowboys224lyfe]

I think this would be intriguing. Gives us a guy who can go up and get the ball, and Dak loves throwing to his TE's

 

[starfan1]

ya atlanta is just sitting there with a come screw us over sign in their front office. I think were ok at that position but atlanta isnt trading pitts

 

[MarcusRock]

No. Ferguson and Hendershot look like they can handle the job...

Which is why Atlanta would want a 1st AND one or both of them plus more.

 

[Rayman70]

ya atlanta is just sitting there with a come screw us over sign in their front office. I think were ok at that position but atlanta isnt trading pitts

^this^. He is a building block. Ridder will be starting QB there any day and I think them 2 guys can be special.

 

[stilltheguru]

So yall want to double down on being wrong about him?

 

[beware_d-ware]

Easily. Pitts is a monster... he hasn't produced like it to date, but I would gladly bet a 1st that Atlanta's QB room is the problem.

 

[cnuball21]

No. I'd probably do a 3rd and Schultz though but doubt the Falcons would bite.

 

[CowboyFrog]

Man im back and forth on this...IF (Huge if) ATL would do this i think you do it, but i also think on this current team we have he could play wide alot (he does in ATL also) and for this team he would be great in this scheme.

 

[Typhus]

Quite a bit far fetched, I admit, but would this not immediately improve our offense? All this speculation about getting a WR, but we have Washington coming back soon. If we’re looking to make that playoff run, I think Pitts would make more sense than any receiver on the block.

Again, a bit far fetched and would probably have to give even more draft capital for him than a 1st, but I believe he would be a huge game changer for our O. Thoughts?

Would be the deepest TE room in the league.

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

Hell nooooo!!!

How many here think you can trade a franchise tagged player?

 

[Typhus]

Man im back and forth on this...IF (Huge if) ATL would do this i think you do it, but i also think on this current team we have he could play wide alot (he does in ATL also) and for this team he would be great in this scheme.

Doubt Atlanta would even consider it, but the thought of Pitts in this offense is entertaining.

 

[USArmyVet]

Why do people come up with such threads that are never going to happen so why consider it?

How about I start a thread asking could I trade my wife for a few playboy models and hooters girls?

While nice to think about, it's NEVER going to happen.

 

[Vinnie2u]

So yall want to double down on being wrong about him?

You mean the fact, that folks around here, were calling him a generational talent and we should trade up to get him. Even tho our defense was putrid.

 

[glimmerman]

Who is pitts.