Sure, why not?At this point, can we say we'd go undefeated against the Giants and Commanders?
I don't know who was blaming Romo. He threw for over 500 yards one game in 2013 and Dallas still lost. That Cowboys team between 2010 and 2013 was just bad. The only thing that changed in 2014 was ball control offense. It kept Tony from being reckless and hid our crap defense. No one expected that.I have this weird feeling that we'll have a really good year this year. This offseason feels like 2013 going into 2014. Everyone was really frustrated after three 8-8 seasons and had pretty much given up on Romo, and the offseason seemed pretty awful, and everyone was very down on the team going into the season. Then in 2014 they had a great season and probably best chance to reach a SB we've seen since 1995.
So we'll probably finally make the championship game this year, lose, sign Dak to a $88m/year contract and then never see a Super Bowl for the rest of our lives. God speed, gentlemen.
Sure, why not?
you don't be there's others on here that think we're just going to roll over these teams because of the star on our helmetsI never expect to sweep divisional opponents. It’s great when it happens though.
Absolutely not. WASH just needs a QB, they have talent. And they're positioned to get one.For several years, we've been extremely successful against these 2 teams. With that said, we've lacked in bringing in talent thus far (YES THERE"S STILL TIME TO MAKE MOVES). At this moment, and with all that we lost/ young players coming in, can we still hold that toughness against these teams as we've done in the past. The Commanders thus far with their available cap space have made numerous move, if they get a QB that could really make them great. What are your thoughts on this, share!!
Can't pay too much for a C. Not having a C screws up your whole.Their new qb will be boom or bust. They paid too much for their new center.
They did. He is average at best, which is why the Cowboys brain trust is going with what they have and what they can get in the draftCan't pay too much for a C. Not having a C screws up your whole.
The thread title is:If we go 0-4 against the Giants and Skins...............that means we will be looking at a top 5 draft pick.
That is what half this board wants, so would it really be considered a jinx?
'Undefeated' means 4-0. My earlier sarcasm equated to the team going 0-4. In sports, a win is a good result and a loss is a bad result. In regards to what 'win' and 'loss' means without morphing their terms by what if scenarios, four losses and zero wins would be the fictional result of a jinx, a.k.a. bad luck, since that result is the polar opposite of four wins and zero losses.At this point, can we say we'd go undefeated against the Giants and Commanders?
agreed sirAbsolutely not. WASH just needs a QB, they have talent. And they're positioned to get one.
Giants do to, not sure they know it yet.
Yeah, the draft is a total crapshoot and you never know who you draft is going to be worth it, especially in the top five,The thread title is:
'Undefeated' means 4-0. My earlier sarcasm equated to the team going 0-4. In sports, a win is a good result and a loss is a bad result. In regards to what 'win' and 'loss' means without morphing their terms by what if scenarios, four losses and zero wins would be the fictional result of a jinx, a.k.a. bad luck, since that result is the polar opposite of four wins and zero losses.
To the tens of thousands of Cowboys fans around the world possibly wanting a 0-4 finish against Washington and New York, plus a guaranteed solid difference making top five selection, I say good luck to that. One, the odds are higher that this 'all in but ain't really all in' team wins a minimum of one out of four meetings against those division rivals this season--than it going 0-4, no matter how many Cowboys
fans desire it. Two, Jerry Jones is the final decision maker no matter how many actual qualified football people he may have installed beneath him in the front office. The closest real life Washington/New York 0-4 win/loss result, that x-number of fans currently want, during Jones' GM tenure, was the Dave Campo coached 2002 season--with the team finishing 1-3 against those two teams and 5-11 overall.
The 5-11 finish landed the franchise in fifth place in the draft order. "...and with the fifth pick in the 2003 NFL draft, the Dallas Cowboys select..."
History reflects what desiring a top five finish produced. Now, someone may come along and counter with, "Shut up, DE. That is just one case." That would be 100% (but I'm not shutting up, lol). Let's ease on down the Jones yellow brick road to 2015. The team went 2-2 against Washington and New York but still finished the regular season 4-12 under Jason Garrett. Jump ahead to the following April draft. Dallas squats in the fourth spot of the draft order. "...and with the fourth pick in the 2016 NFL draft, the Dallas Cowboys select..."
History reflected what desiring a top five finish produced. Again. Maybe the third time will be the charm under Jones if hopeful Cowboys fans get a 0-4 finish against the Commanders and Giants (or some other win/loss combination)? Stay tuned.
You are talking about going against Daniel Jones and a rookie qb.
That's because Romo choked at the moment of truth which was who he was.I don't know who was blaming Romo. He threw for over 500 yards one game in 2013 and Dallas still lost. That Cowboys team between 2010 and 2013 was just bad. The only thing that changed in 2014 was ball control offense. It kept Tony from being reckless and hid our crap defense. No one expected that.
What happened in 2014 could happen to any team that has a dominating run game. No one can predict that. What else could give us an unexpected good year?