Romo was an amazing quarterback

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
28,173
Reaction score
18,761
The Jedi label was because he was elusive in the backfield. He might of ultimately not got it done in the Playoffs like the current quarterback, but even when he was one hit away from retirement he was still elusive. Can't take that away from him.
I just have to say, I agree, but, yes, there’s a butt. You can’t expect any quarterback to make it in the playoffs without help on both sides of the ball. Every time we’ve made it, the defense didn’t match the offense .
 

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,960
Reaction score
10,442
Being a fan for 50 years I felt there was an unwritten rule that if a player plays for the Cowboys you support him. Give him the benefit of the doubt and such. When Troy started getting disrespected to support Dak that really rubbed me the wrong way. Then when Romo started getting disrespected to support Dak it bothered me but not as bad as when Troy got dissed.

What set me over the edge to put me in a place that I really, really dislike Dak was the Trey Lance situation. I remember bashing Josh Ball for his off the field issues and I got called out for not supporting our player and not giving him a 2nd chance. And I agree as a Cowboys fan I should support the player, regardless of personal opinion. But when Lance was here there was some serious hate for the guy and he didn’t do anything besides get traded for. I mean Kelvin Joseph got more support on this board than Lance did.

The argument against Lance was he was a waste of team resources. I agree. But I feel strongly that paying Dak 60 million APY is a waste of team resources. The argument for Dak’s contract is don’t blame Dak for Jerry being a bad GM. Well that same argument should have been made for Lance. Don’t hate the player and the person of Lance because Jerry sucks.

I think for if you add up the constant disrespect of Lance, Aikman, Emmitt and Romo to prop up Dak made me really long for the day Dak isn’t with us.
I think every fan as the right to critique any player on the current roster. It doesn't matter if the player is a quarterback, linebacker, running back, etc. What some of the Dak homers didn't realize was despite them posting endless propaganda threads on here, Dak got more hate than he would've otherwise, because of their hypocrisy and their willingness to bury other players that some fans like for the sake of propping their guy up. Then to go after cowboys Royalty like Aikman, Emmitt, and Irvin because of something to do about Dak, that seemed like the ultimate low. We heard crazy things like Aikman was average; that Dak would've won three superbowls on those teams and done better. That Emmitt had some sort of deminished mental capacity from taking one to many hits on the head, when he critized Dak, etc. Even Jimmy got some shade for saying that he wouldn't have re-signed Dak to that rideculous contract. The Irony is that Dak homers despite trying to change people minds ended up making people hate Dak more.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,685
Reaction score
77,904
The Jedi label was because he was elusive in the backfield. He might of ultimately not got it done in the Playoffs like the current quarterback, but even when he was one hit away from retirement he was still elusive. Can't take that away from him.
Elusive? Didn’t he get hurt in a preseason game trying to be elusive which essentially ended his career?
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,134
Reaction score
17,119
Not a fan of any Cowboys QB since Aikman. I will admit Romo was an entertaining watch. Couldn't get it done when it mattered but made some average teams at least a fun watch.
Where..in your eyes...was it Romo that failed us?

Please don;t say the muffed FG snap. We know. :facepalm:


Maybe 2-3 other examples that it was Romo alone couldn't get it done".
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,685
Reaction score
77,904
I think every fan as the right to critique any player on the current roster. It doesn't matter if the player is a quarterback, linebacker, running back, etc. What some of the Dak homers didn't realize was despite them posting endless propaganda threads on here, Dak got more hate than he would've otherwise, because of their hypocrisy and their willingness to bury other players that some fans like for the sake of propping their guy up. Then to go after cowboys Royalty like Aikman, Emmitt, and Irvin because of something to do about Dak, that seemed like the ultimate low. We heard crazy things like Aikman was average; that Dak would've won three superbowls on those teams and done better. That Emmitt had some sort of deminished mental capacity from taking one to many hits on the head, when he critized Dak, etc. Even Jimmy got some shade for saying that he wouldn't have re-signed Dak to that rideculous contract. The Irony is that Dak homers despite trying to change people minds ended up making people hate Dak more.
It’s funny though these same rules didn’t apply to Romo. You wouldn’t dare “criticize” Romo lol.

And the only people who go at Aikman are Romo fans who say he would’ve won with those teams. People think Romo was as good as Brady on this site….it’s weird.
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
28,173
Reaction score
18,761
It’s funny though these same rules didn’t apply to Romo. You wouldn’t dare “criticize” Romo lol.

And the only people who go at Aikman are Romo fans who say he would’ve won with those teams. People think Romo was as good as Brady on this site….it’s weird.
Romo same nationality as most the fans in Dallas that live in and around the area. They tell me they had their hero and no one‘s taking him away from them. And that’s what it should not come down to.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
8,510
Elusive? Didn’t he get hurt in a preseason game trying to be elusive which essentially ended his career?
Why do you keep typing and only continue to prove yourself irrational? One example of a player getting hurt who gets tackled from behind and lands awkwardly on his back due to it doesn’t nullify the many times previously where he was elusive.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
52,686
Reaction score
98,591
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
I always liked Romo he was an exciting player to watch with his escapability and ability to improvise. When he threw the ball down the field I always felt like good things could happen as he released it.

However, his lack of playoff success and reputation for not playing as well in December, will hold him out of being included as one of the great QBs of his era. Certainly one of the top 5 QBs to play for the Cowboys though.
Earlier in his career, whenever he threw down field my heart was in my throat, because it seemed like there was a 50/50 chance of an interception. The last 3 or 4 years though, I had a lot more confidence in his decision making.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
8,510
Earlier in his career, whenever he threw down field my heart was in my throat, because it seemed like there was a 50/50 chance of an interception. The last 3 or 4 years though, I had a lot more confidence in his decision making.
I chalk this up to nothing more than repetitive media slant enforcing their confirmation bias in the minds of gags of the games. I believe Romo’s worst interception ranked season was when he threw 19 picks in one season early in his career where he threw an anomalous five picks in one game. Manning, Brees, and Brady had those games and multiple four pick games as well. The difference is obviously they had teams that competed for and won SBs and also had many more opportunities to update the narrative, one that happens with all QBs. Romo was far from a pick machine in the playoffs. In fact, he was pretty good at protecting the ball from interceptions in the limited set of games.
 

Dorsett33

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,029
Reaction score
1,223
I can’t believe there are Cowboys “fans” who not only trash Aikman but Romo too. Tony Romo was a legend and a man. Yeah we never won a Super Bowl with him but that was a man I could respect. I’m getting really tired of all these people who come on here to prop up Dak and in the process are trying to tarnish Troy’s legacy and Romo’s heroics. Not trying to make another Dak thread but enough with trolling these boards! Tony Romo was talented and we wish we could have a man like that again running this football team
IMO, Troy had the luxury of having a put together team from the coaching staff to one of the best O-line in NFL history, which led to the NFL's leading rusher and a good set of WRs...not to mention the TE. And the defense was GREAT. Troy benefitted from that and as he should. Not to say Troy was trash cause he wasn't. But a superstar only because of the team around him. Not a QB that can put a team on his back

Romo, I liked. He was turnover prone. I think him and Dak are about the same to me. Had him or Dak had the team Troy had, I think both would be SB Champions. I've seen Romo put a team on his back. I've seen Dak put the team on his back. The difference between the two, only hearing other players say this, is Dak is a much better leader than Romo.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
52,686
Reaction score
98,591
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
I chalk this up to nothing more than repetitive media slant enforcing their confirmation bias in the minds of gags of the games. I believe Romo’s worst interception ranked season was when he threw 19 picks in one season early in his career where he threw an anomalous five picks in one game. Manning, Brees, and Brady had those games and multiple four pick games as well. The difference is obviously they had teams that competed for and won SBs and also had many more opportunities to update the narrative, one that happens with all QBs. Romo was far from a pick machine in the playoffs. In fact, he was pretty good at protecting the ball from interceptions in the limited set of games.
I think a lot of my concern was because the camera just followed the ball from Romo's hand, through the air, with no picture of where the receiver was until it got there. I'm talking only about the long bombs, of course. Showing the arc of the pass made me nervous as to what was waiting at the other end. But as I said, the last few years I had more confidence.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,685
Reaction score
77,904
Why do you keep typing and only continue to prove yourself irrational? One example of a player getting hurt who gets tackled from behind and lands awkwardly on his back due to it doesn’t nullify the many times previously where he was elusive.
We aren’t talking about the other years. We are talking about him when he was 34. At 28 or 29 he for sure was elusive…well I don’t know if I’d call it elusive. Vick and Randall Cunningham were elusive. I don’t know if I’d call Romo elusive. He had great pocket awareness though.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,685
Reaction score
77,904
IMO, Troy had the luxury of having a put together team from the coaching staff to one of the best O-line in NFL history, which led to the NFL's leading rusher and a good set of WRs...not to mention the TE. And the defense was GREAT. Troy benefitted from that and as he should. Not to say Troy was trash cause he wasn't. But a superstar only because of the team around him. Not a QB that can put a team on his back

Romo, I liked. He was turnover prone. I think him and Dak are about the same to me. Had him or Dak had the team Troy had, I think both would be SB Champions. I've seen Romo put a team on his back. I've seen Dak put the team on his back. The difference between the two, only hearing other players say this, is Dak is a much better leader than Romo.
Aikman didn’t walk in with an already made team though. He had to develop with trash around him and youth.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
8,510
We aren’t talking about the other years. We are talking about him when he was 34. At 28 or 29 he for sure was elusive…well I don’t know if I’d call it elusive. Vick and Randall Cunningham were elusive. I don’t know if I’d call Romo elusive. He had great pocket awareness though.
No, there is no “we” in this. No one limited Romo’s elusiveness to when he was just 34. Only you.
 

nobody

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,072
Reaction score
19,782
We aren’t talking about the other years. We are talking about him when he was 34. At 28 or 29 he for sure was elusive…well I don’t know if I’d call it elusive. Vick and Randall Cunningham were elusive. I don’t know if I’d call Romo elusive. He had great pocket awareness though.
Romo's ability to sense pressure when he had no way of actually seeing it was almost spooky good...hence the Jedi title. He also seemed to mind-trick defenders at time with his escapes. He was never fast in doing it.
 

Dorsett33

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,029
Reaction score
1,223
Aikman didn’t walk in with an already made team though. He had to develop with trash around him and youth.
Exact reason he couldn't carry a team. Neither Romo or Dak had a FULL team whether walked into one or built. They were always missing something....coaching, key position players, entire units.
 
Top