The final episode was ridiculously tense!Finally got around to watching 1923 series.
Enjoyed it
Yes Season 2 was much better.I just got around to watching House of the Dragon, season 2. It is certainly better than season one but I just do not think it is anywhere near as good as GoT first 4 seasons.
I was very disappointed with the final episode which was a letdown compared to the buildup towards to the expecting ending. I think the show relied too much on dragons flying around. I like how they the it into the period of GoT every now and then with flashes of the future, or events that explain some thing in GoT.
Part of the problem is the main characters don't really move the needle for me. I kind of see what maybe the writers want us to think about these characters, but it is not working for me. Who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. It changes back and forth but that doesn't help the viewers relate. Maybe it doesn't matter? There are no good guys or bad guys, just powerful people struggling to retain their power with all their human flaws?
HotD seems to have fallen into that trap of building up to a spectacular end. Season 2 leads up to an expectation of a spectacular beginning of season 3, but will we finally get the war of dragons they have been leading us to believe is inevitable? or will season 3 beginning by turning down the heat and then build it up again for season 4, which I believe is supposed to be the final season?
I admit after watching season 1 and the first episode of season 2, I was going to skip show. But I have run out of things to watch so I started it again. I am not disappointed, but I am on guard for disappointment.
The thing about Game of Thrones is they didn't need cliffhanger endings and buildup for what was to come, at least not in the first few seasons. It always felt like there was a real story behind GoT. Which is why the last season and episode was such a disappointment to me. HotD seems to be a setup for something to come. The cliffhanger at the end of S2 is such a cliché ending, and an obvious lure to build interest in season 3 when it comes in a year or two, or three. It feels like they are leaving a trail of Reeses Pieces for viewers to follow for as long as they want us to follow. The expectations for season 4 are going to be extremely high, maybe too high for them to deliver.Yes Season 2 was much better.
The last few episodes with the dragons and young Lord Tully scenes were the best and was building up to a great ending but they cut it a tad short but it left you wanting more which is what makes you want to tune in for the next season.
The problem with the last season of GOT was 2 foldThe thing about Game of Thrones is they didn't need cliffhanger endings and buildup for what was to come, at least not in the first few seasons. It always felt like there was a real story behind GoT. Which is why the last season and episode was such a disappointment to me. HotD seems to be a setup for something to come. The cliffhanger at the end of S2 is such a cliché ending, and an obvious lure to build interest in season 3 when it comes in a year or two, or three. It feels like they are leaving a trail of Reeses Pieces for viewers to follow for as long as they want us to follow. The expectations for season 4 are going to be extremely high, maybe too high for them to deliver.
The characters in GoT alone were worth watching. The characters in HotD are boring, IMO. There is nothing close to the relationship of Arya and the Hound, or Jaime Lannister and Brienne of Tarth. There are no Ned Starks, Tyrion Lannisters, or even Bronn. The characters in HotD are so ordinary.
I agree with you about the scenes with Lord Tully. I Don't think we will see that developed much more than what we saw though.
I might check it out. Daniel Craig is always pretty good.Archangel
Netflix
Short series set in Russia
About Stalin and the search for hos son
Daniel Craig is lead
Pretty good 6.5/10