Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 79,206
- Reaction score
- 104,392
If you have to think of it as a ‘problem’, I guess it would be not wanting to use future draft capital on a player likely to miss games as part of a ‘committee approach’.Two games missed in 2022.
Two games missed in 2023.
Six games missed in 2024.
If a player misses a couple of games a year, that's not much. That's acceptable.
If a player misses six games a year, yeah, that's a lot.
Maybe he misses six this season. Maybe he misses a couple. Who knows. Likely to miss some, but how many is an open question.10 games missed over three seasons is an 80% availability rate.
Again, to the very point you just made... you already know that this is going to be a committee approach for 25-26, so what's the problem here?
I’d rather sign someone off the street for no draft pick to be part of a committee.