DoomsdayMachine
Active Member
- Messages
- 103
- Reaction score
- 148
Well one has the control and the other one is pretending like they have control.I dont think either one is bluffing. It's more of a pissing contest at this point. We, the fans, lose with this mess.
I feel our D has a bigger impact than our O on how the season plays out.It’s starts with the offensive line. We need a big season from Guyton, Smith, Bebe, Booker, and Steele.The offensive line is the key for us to be a top NFC East team or a bottom NFC East team.
Cleveland always has money and no one wants to go there.If we trade him, I want to trade him to a terrible team. I would want to make him irrelevant.
.....lol...
He can't play against the eagles, his little back is hurting.I agree. But it does look like he's trying to not play and still get paid. That's what it looks like. Besides, even if he did play against Philly, he'd have to be on some kind of pitch count. He hasn't practiced at all.
The guy has played like 3 years total of football.Oh but that might have meant cutting Mazi and these dummies aren’t going to do that.
There's always risk the doctor can lose their license in such a scenario but even if a test shows mild inflammation they could always recommend rest for 2-3 weeks, etc. Which buys time to continue the hold in and facilitate a potential trade. But it is odd as a back issue could lower trade interest/contract and he may end up playing on a short term deal anyway if there was an issue.He wants to be put in IR so he can get paid, and accrue his season.
It is another stupid ploy.
Wonder how much this agent pays to the doctor.
Not out to hurt your feelings...sorry you feel that way. Not sure why you would.Lol you keep trying to hammer this point like it’s going to hurt my feelings or something.
Good point, but I seriously doubt that. Unless we are intentionally trying to make the same mistake the Mavericks did.There's always risk the doctor can lose their license in such a scenario but even if a test shows mild inflammation they could always recommend rest for 2-3 weeks, etc. Which buys time to continue the hold in and facilitate a potential trade. But it is odd as a back issue could lower trade interest/contract and he may end up playing on a short term deal anyway if there was an issue.
On a side note could a 2nd opinion also mean a potential trade that has another team just wanting to check out the back before finalizing a deal?
I want to trade him to a team that their starting QB is mysteriously ran over by a Scottish tourist driving on the "wrong" side of the road. Their season is ruined and Dallas get a top 3 pick plus their own.If we trade him, I want to trade him to a terrible team. I would want to make him irrelevant.
they did end up putting Goodwin back on the 53 along with AdenijiReports say Goodwin is already on the practice squad. Maybe they are signing another corner from outside the organization.
They will get a second spot once they put Mafah on IR too; if that is still their plan.
No, it absolutely is not because it is in the future, which drops it's value by 1 round in 2026 and by 2 rounds in 2027.The "reported" trade package Green Bay would send Dallas is two 1st round picks, a 2nd round pick, and a 5th round pick.
I am assuming that's a 1st and 2nd in 2026 and a 1st and 5th in 2027. Considering the Packers would probably be in the latter part of the round, I am not convinced that's good enough compensation. But still worth discussing as a hypothetical.
This is their version of "due diligence."source is a guy on X
of course the Packers have interest, so do 30 other teams.
LOL .. I see you are WAY too heavily invested in this to be objective about it.1. Micah is not going to sit and lose $14M and destroy his precious stats, that he has to stay in games up 3 TD's, so he can get more.
2. Micah is not going to win his fake injury claim.
3. I think several people would be happy if he talked less. Just shut up and play.
Those are not cards. Those are bluffs.
