Crazy on how you focus on one thing, excuse me one FACT, and try to deflect to something that literally doesn't matter. They are what they are. They gave up 400+ yards to the great Cleveland Browns offense. They are 4 games in and have given up 400+ yards twice. The truth is, nobody really knows what they are yet, or what the Cowboys offense is yet.
Emotionally taking for granted that the Packers defense is great because of pre-season hype and the addition of Parsons is... well... emotional. The facts say they have been good but not great, so far.
How come you're ignoring the main point, though? The statement was made that Dak has "beaten up on good defenses". I literally gave GB credit for having a good but not great defense and pointed out that theirs was the only defense Dak has played that could be considered good at this point in the season. You're arguing a strawman and a terrible one at that. Nothing personal going on there, eh kid?
What's weak is the personal attacks and innuendo. If you mattered at all I'd report you but watching you expose yourself is much more entertaining.
1 good but not great defense
4 not very good defenses
Facts