If you think Dak played well

Tell us you have no idea how football works without telling us you have NO idea how football works.
Here's the thing, you and I don't know each other. So save the insults because I rank your opinion of me somewhere between navel lint and a good hangover.

Now explain how a QB who passes the ball somehow is immune from 100% blame of resulting ints. Go.
 
Silly? Maybe. But unlike stats padded in a pocket, facts don’t care about feelings or authority rankings. 1,000,000,001 people would agree. facts > feelings
Yeah, that pocket was flawless last night, too.

Good grief, you’re obtuse and, what’s worse, you’re stubborn about it. You’re gonna dig your heels in with your idiocy. The entire world can objectively agree that Dak was getting crushed last night, and here you are insisting he’s just sitting back there sipping tea and throwing bombs with all day to spare.

Ok. Whatever you say.
 
I was referring to the defense, ST, and coaching. When he had time to get them the ball, yes they were great.

Also, I'm not saying he didn't have issues, but it's harder to be accurate when you're expecting to be pummeled any second...all game long.
We shoulda got him on th emove. We do it so rarely we might not be able to.
 
Here's the thing, you and I don't know each other. So save the insults because I rank your opinion of me somewhere between navel lint and a good hangover.

Now explain how a QB who passes the ball somehow is immune from 100% blame of resulting ints. Go.
Here’s the thing.

ChatGPT thinks you’re an idiot and so do I.

And did I say Dak is “immune from 100% of the blame”? No, I did not. On the contrary, I’ve acknowledged that Dak didn’t have his best game. There are FACTORS as to why that was the case, and I have already shared my thoughts. Feel free to look them up, and feel free to put me on ignore.

I really don’t care. It isn’t like there aren’t 20 more just like you here.
 
Here’s the thing.

ChatGPT thinks you’re an idiot and so do I.

And did I say Dak is “immune from 100% of the blame”? No, I did not. On the contrary, I’ve acknowledged that Dak didn’t have his best game. There are FACTORS as to why that was the case, and I have already shared my thoughts. Feel free to look them up, and feel free to put me on ignore.

I really don’t care. It isn’t like there aren’t 20 more just like you here.
Awwww, does this mean we won't be holding hands? Run along pumpkin.
 
Yeah, that pocket was flawless last night, too.

Good grief, you’re obtuse and, what’s worse, you’re stubborn about it. You’re gonna dig your heels in with your idiocy. The entire world can objectively agree that Dak was getting crushed last night, and here you are insisting he’s just sitting back there sipping tea and throwing bombs with all day to spare.

Ok. Whatever you say.
Obtuse? Stubborn? Maybe — but unlike Dak, who only looks good with an elite pocket and top WRs, facts don’t need a padded line to be true. Stats ≠ carrying a team. Facts > feelings.

Sipping tea in the pocket? Only if panic lobs and missed reads count as relaxing. Facts don’t get crushed under elite defenses — Dak does.

one more for you to sip on:
Sipping tea in the pocket? Sure… if the tea is panic, the cups are misreads, and the saucer is a collapsing O-line. Facts > feelings.
 
Hiding behind AI...really? The blind leading the blind
Hiding behind AI?

You really are an idiot. Do you not understand how ChatGPT works? Let’s all take the authoritative word of OGSixShooter instead of the collective intelligence and data of the entire knowledge of professional football.

Wow. You’re something.

When did this forum get filled with such arrogance and ignorance?

It’s like you’re walking into the world’s library of collective works that exist or ever DID exist and announcing to everyone “yeah, nice books, but listen to ME because I really know what’s up”.

Ok. Do go on.

Do you not hear yourself?
 
Hiding behind AI?

You really are an idiot. Do you not understand how ChatGPT works? Let’s all take the authoritative word of OGSixShooter instead of the collective intelligence and data of the entire knowledge of professional football.

Wow. You’re something.

When did this forum get filled with such arrogance and ignorance?

It’s like you’re walking into the world’s library of collective works that exist or ever DID exist and announcing to everyone “yeah, nice books, but listen to ME because I really know what’s up”.

Ok. Do go on.

Do you not hear yourself?
Maybe lighten up on the name calling? It's actually against the rules.
 
Obtuse? Stubborn? Maybe — but unlike Dak, who only looks good with an elite pocket and top WRs, facts don’t need a padded line to be true. Stats ≠ carrying a team. Facts > feelings.

Sipping tea in the pocket? Only if panic lobs and missed reads count as relaxing. Facts don’t get crushed under elite defenses — Dak does.

one more for you to sip on:
Sipping tea in the pocket? Sure… if the tea is panic, the cups are misreads, and the saucer is a collapsing O-line. Facts > feelings.
You’re funny.

Honestly, I’m laughing.

You’re really convinced that typing “facts > feelings” again and again somehow makes you right.
 
Writing “facts > feelings” endlessly doesn’t make it fact. Frankly, it makes you look silly. 1,000,000,000 of 1,000,000,000 people will consider ChatGPT to be more authoritative than you, but…please…do go on.
you don't really think that ChatGPT's generic answer is better & more authoritative than having watched the game & understanding all the nuances that can't be converted for a machine to understand do ya?
 
Naw man, Mr. Prescott expects perfection to operate. Only that will allow this team to carry his mediocre rear end to a SB.
He did just fine the three weeks prior, without perfection.
It's one thing to have to avoid the occasional pass rusher, and a whole other thing to have to deal with a jailbreak on most snaps.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
475,617
Messages
14,627,174
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top