Twitter: Cowboys Tyler Smith on moving from LG to LT

WoodysGirl

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,813
Reaction score
47,819
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan


Cowboys OL Tyler Smith on potentially moving from LG to LT permanently:“I’m an All-Pro guard, bro. You feel me?That’s the simple truth if we’re just looking purely off facts. We’ll see what happens. We’ll have those conversations and kind of see where everybody’s head is at.”“I’m not letting my mind getting too far ahead with that. In my mind, it’s just for the rest of the season.”
Click to expand...
 
Just posted in another thread........Tyler isn't stupid. He's well award the pay difference from guard to LT.
My guess is
* they have def decided Guyton isn't the long-term answer
* they wanna see IF Tyler can play at the same All-Pro level
* IF NOT, they will keep him at LG and go shopping for a Guyton's replacement

 
big dog cowboy said:
Doesn't sound like he wants to play outside. Something the members in here didn't consider when they have been trying to get him out to tackle for the last 2 years.
Click to expand...
Hmmmm........Zack Martin felt the same way and frankly, I don't blame them. You are taking me away of my ALL Pro level position and asking me to master ANOTHER position at the same level
 
Nate played RT for a bit before they put him at guard. LA played RT when Big E went down and bacame all pro at guard. Since when have players dictated where they play. Smith could be an all pro at both positions.
 
This team has such a horrible defense the only path to upgrade LT other then Smith to me is FA , the draft picks are a premium I want going to D . So make Guyton your left tackle in 26 and roll the dice .

:huh:
 
RonWashington said:
When do players get to choose where & when they play . If the team can be more successful with LT taken off the table of needs I say talk to him honestly and openly . Guyton missed too many games to me for him to be the going forward LT . Let him compete for RT .
Click to expand...
Exactly
What a stupid FO
 
mrmojo said:
Nate played RT for a bit before they put him at guard. LA played RT when Big E went down and bacame all pro at guard. Since when have players dictated where they play. Smith could be an all pro at both positions.
Click to expand...
You really want a guy playing a position that he doesn't like to play? I'm sure he doesn't care if he's got to step in and play left tackle for a couple of games due to an injury or whatever but it doesn't sound like he wants to play that position long-term.
 
I get the frustration, but he needs to do what's best for the team. Not taking away from his abilities as a guard, but the QB is taking a beating because we don't have anyone that can play OT. I don't see it as a permanent move, but it should be able to buy us time to find a true replacement without expending assets that really need to go towards the defense right now. This move improves two tackle spots once Guyton is healthy. I don't think we have a choice but to move forward with this alignment unless a can't miss prospect falls in the draft.
 
I never supported moving him and this is just one of the reasons why.

He’s already having a down year. This won’t help.
 
Last edited:
Hawkeye0202 said:
Just posted in another thread........Tyler isn't stupid. He's well award the pay difference from guard to LT.
My guess is
* they have def decided Guyton isn't the long-term answer
* they wanna see IF Tyler can play at the same All-Pro level
* IF NOT, they will keep him at LG and go shopping for a Guyton's replacement

Click to expand...

It's absolutely about them not paying him like a LT when he signed his extension. I don't blame him.

He may end up being an All-Pro LT. He is a good player and it's possible he excels outside. That would be a major discount for the team having him at a Guards price excelling at LT.

I respect his business sense.
 
What if this was the boys plan all along and they deliberately paid him Guard money and signed him and then suddenly DECIDE to move him to LT?
 
Wonder if you could assuage some of this if he plays great at LT by restructuring and or adding some incentives to his contract.

Although it might not be money based either.

Tyler Smith being a great LT is much better for us than him being a great LG. Much easier hole to fill, sends Guyton to RT lets you gain some cap with a Steele cut.
 
Hawkeye0202 said:
Just posted in another thread........Tyler isn't stupid. He's well award the pay difference from guard to LT.
My guess is
* they have def decided Guyton isn't the long-term answer
* they wanna see IF Tyler can play at the same All-Pro level
* IF NOT, they will keep him at LG and go shopping for a Guyton's replacement

Click to expand...

His pay is close to the top 5 LT's in the NFL. Switching to LT is a great move for him financially. If he makes Pro Bowls as an LT, his 3rd contract will be much bigger than it is as an LG
 
slick325 said:
It's absolutely about them not paying him like a LT when he signed his extension. I don't blame him.

He may end up being an All-Pro LT. He is a good player and it's possible he excels outside. That would be a major discount for the team having him at a Guards price excelling at LT.

I respect his business sense.
Click to expand...
He is making close to top 5 LT money. He is making 24m AAV. The top 5 LT's range from 28M to 25M
 
I feel a hold out coming if this is the plan next season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 11,007 (members: 35, guests: 10,972)
Robots: 1,862

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,578
Messages
14,546,583
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top