Darnold > Prescott

Darnold's salary would have saved us $30 mil a year. That's a lot of money that can be used to shore up the D. Darnold + $30 million would have gotten us into the playoffs.
Agree
 
He had his best opportunity in the 19-12 divisional loss to the Niners.

It was his equivalent to Romos 26-21 divisional loss to the Packers.
Breakdown (based on the SI summary)

Total games vs 2025 playoff teams: 7

Wins: 1

Losses: 5

Tie: 1

Explanation: SI specifically said that stat was a defining number for Dallas — they beat only one playoff team out of seven matchups, and the tie came vs another playoff team.

He's just dak good.
 
Jim Kelly, Dan Marino, Joe Burrows, Josh Allen, etc aren't smart enough to WIN a Superbowl.

I'd take Trent Dilfer over all of them in a heartbeat.
dilfer had a generational defense.

Those defenses are far and few between.
 
Now Sam Darnold gets to not just a NFC Conference finals, he is in the Superbowl. So he is a far better QB than Dak. I am not a Dak hater. He is a "good" QB but not at the level of Sam Darnold.
The ONLY ONLY O-N-L-Y stat fans care about is WINS. Hell, Drake Maye was 13 years old when
Dak Prescott started his NFL career and he is in the Superbowl, with Darnold. So both QBs are better than Prescott and Dak gets paid 2 - 3 TIMES more than both combined.
 
Because other then this year, he's played well in the playoffs. He is the Buffalo Bill's. Without him this version doesn't even have a winning record.

It sounds good but, he's paid to win Superbowls at this point.

If he is the Buffalo Bills, why isn't he able to make it to Superbowls by now? He's elite, correct?

So non elite quarterbacks like Trent Dilfer, Nick Foles, Colin Kaepernick, Brad Johnson and now Sam Darnold can get their teams to Superbowls and never made half of what Josh Allen makes, but an elite, Josh Allen can't with the salary he is making and the record breaking signing bonus he got?

According to what the expectation of what quarterback success is from many threads and posts that I've read, we can't give Josh Allen any excuses.
 
dilfer had a generational defense.

Those defenses are far and few between.


When NFL quarterbacks are discussed here, the defense, special teams, coaching and front office aren't considered as to what a quarterback's regular season or post season record is.

Quarterbacks are judged by post season success and I have no problem with it. Trent Dilfer won a Superbowl. So we can't discount his post season accomplishments.

Again, this is according to how all NFL quarterbacks are judged. I didn't make up the rules, im just abiding by them.
 
No doubt. It's clear the problem with Darnold was the Jets.

Darnold throughout the years have been groomed by Kevin O'Connell, Kyle Shanahan and Clint Kubiak. So it shouldn't be surprising how well he was able to develop.

Coaching matters tremendously. There are other quarterbacks in the NFL who have or had the talent to win but didn't have proper coaching to develop their skills and mindset at this level.

Quarterback talent in this league isn't enough.
 
Debate is over!!!!
Darnold is way better than Dak. Dak could not of made some of those throws Darnold was making. Stats don’t mean jack when your level of play drops to a back up level in the playoffs. What the whole world witnessed was defenses were getting gashed, and QBs stepped up. We saw what Darnold did on a bigger stage than Dak has ever been on. Dak Stan’s can shut their big mouth now!

I could not disagree with you. As a matter of fact, Darnold proved that not only is he way better than Dak, but he's WAY better than Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, Justin Herbert, and Trevor Lawrence.

Hell, Trent Dilfer and Colin Kaepernick are WAY better than the quarterbacks in mentioned in the last sentence above.
 
Darnold's salary would have saved us $30 mil a year. That's a lot of money that can be used to shore up the D. Darnold + $30 million would have gotten us into the playoffs.

So you're telling me that Sam Darnold would have gotten us to the playoffs and to the Superbowl behind the same 21st ranked offensive line and last placed ranked defense that we had this year?

Darnold is better than Dak, so surely he would have taken THIS recent Cowboys team to the Superbowl, correct?
 
So you're telling me that Sam Darnold would have gotten us to the playoffs and to the Superbowl behind the same 21st ranked offensive line and last placed ranked defense that we had this year?

Darnold is better than Dak, so surely he would have taken THIS recent Cowboys team to the Superbowl, correct?
It should be ok to give Darnold some props without tying it to Dak. They are both good QBs. Darnold has not been clutch in big games in the past and took a while to find his footing, but he played a great game yesterday against a team that has kind of had his number.

THis doesn't diminish the numbers Dak has put up. And it doesn't consider all the circumstances involved when one QB makes it to the Super Bowl when another doesn't.
 
It's cute Noone will answer my question on how many wins would Darnold have with Dallas roster last year. Maybe it's because everyone knows the answer. :popcorn: :muttley:
 
It should be ok to give Darnold some props without tying it to Dak. They are both good QBs. Darnold has not been clutch in big games in the past and took a while to find his footing, but he played a great game yesterday against a team that has kind of had his number.

THis doesn't diminish the numbers Dak has put up. And it doesn't consider all the circumstances involved when one QB makes it to the Super Bowl when another doesn't.

Respectfully.... I have been giving props to Sam Darnold since the game ended.

I responded to a person claiming Sam Darnold would have taken us to the playoffs. I didn't tie Dak to Darnold, the person i responded to did.

I clearly stated that Darnold IS BETTER than Dak right now in the same post that you responded to..... Which part of that didn't sound like i didn't give Sam Darnold props?
 
It's cute Noone will answer my question on how many wins would Darnold have with Dallas roster last year. Maybe it's because everyone knows the answer. :popcorn: :muttley:

You know what.... I asked this same question twice and its been avoided like a plague. Sam Darnold is balling right now, no question....

But Darnold, Mahomes, Josh Allen, or any other quarterback on the planet would not have gotten us through any playoff games.

Its hilarious how some people here are afraid of answering those narrative crushing questions.
 
Sam Darnold is also better than Patrick Mahomes, since Patrick Mahomes didn't make the playoffs.
 
So you're telling me that Sam Darnold would have gotten us to the playoffs and to the Superbowl behind the same 21st ranked offensive line and last placed ranked defense that we had this year?

Darnold is better than Dak, so surely he would have taken THIS recent Cowboys team to the Superbowl, correct?
He does have a better hairline
 
There's no hope for Dak's career when he's pulling $60 mil a year and there's no money left over to build a team. Sam's success is partly due to his team friendly contract which gives the team the ability to build a team around him. When Dak's contract runs out in 2 years, Jerry is going to panic again and give him $75 mil a year.
You must not know how Jones boys operate. Regardless of how much Dak or anyone else is getting paid, the Jones will not spend big money on anyone on defense. We haven't had any big money FA on defense since Brandon Carr in 2012. The Jones could have done it in 2017 when Dak was making 4th rounder money. In fact, that's the time they should have done it since we had the young QB and the best RB in the NFL on rookie contracts.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,617
Messages
14,627,195
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top