Free Style: Reddy Steward's versatility could give Cowboys depth at CB

[Kwyn]

For anyone interested in the post bye secondary

DB	LV	PHI	KC	DET	MIN	SD	WAS	NY
Bland	81	65	72	51	52	DNP	DNP	DNP
Wilson	68	58	61	61	69	60	35	56
Carson	62	44	DNP	60	46	DNP	DNP	60
Steward	60	64	67	59	27	37	48	49
Bell	59	44	73	30	64	83	66	60
Revell	63	53	49	29	49	49	50	DNP
Hooker	77	75	43	65	47	45	69	59
Clark, A	60	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP
Bridges	DNP	67	66	DNP	DNP	75	62	58

 

[MikeT22]

Really no reason to sing the praises of anyone from last years secondary

The hype is already starting as if he is a new player weve never seen before

 

[gtb1943]

For anyone interested in the post bye secondary

DB	LV	PHI	KC	DET	MIN	SD	WAS	NY
Bland	81	65	72	51	52	DNP	DNP	DNP
Wilson	68	58	61	61	69	60	35	56
Carson	62	44	DNP	60	46	DNP	DNP	60
Steward	60	64	67	59	27	37	48	49
Bell	59	44	73	30	64	83	66	60
Revell	63	53	49	29	49	49	50	DNP
Hooker	77	75	43	65	47	45	69	59
Clark, A	60	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP
Bridges	DNP	67	66	DNP	DNP	75	62	58

just to remind people that 70 is league average and look how FEW there are and only ONE score over 80 by Bland

 

[JBS]

OP loves hyping up scrubs

 

[gtb1943]

and if you look at that chart, Steward had the LOWEST SINGLE SCORE OF ANYONE

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

He gave up 45 catchs on 54 targets per PFF

I’m loud and wrong. I don’t know where I got that number from. Though that’s abysmal I still feel he made more plays than anyone else in our secondary from his sacks, pressures and tackles for loss.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

If we're counting on Reddy Steward, we've already lost free agency.

We aren’t talking difference maker we are talking about as the 4th or 5th corner.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

For anyone interested in the post bye secondary

DB	LV	PHI	KC	DET	MIN	SD	WAS	NY
Bland	81	65	72	51	52	DNP	DNP	DNP
Wilson	68	58	61	61	69	60	35	56
Carson	62	44	DNP	60	46	DNP	DNP	60
Steward	60	64	67	59	27	37	48	49
Bell	59	44	73	30	64	83	66	60
Revell	63	53	49	29	49	49	50	DNP
Hooker	77	75	43	65	47	45	69	59
Clark, A	60	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP	DNP
Bridges	DNP	67	66	DNP	DNP	75	62	58

What do these numbers represent?

 

[gimmesix]

This

I think he's decent depth in that fourth-sixth slot, but that should be it. You need players like him, but not counting on him to start.

 

[gimmesix]

We aren’t talking difference maker we are talking about as the 4th or 5th corner.

Well, that's what we should be talking about. I'd prefer that he and Carson not be among our top four next year. Fourth is definitely the highest on the depth chart I would consider either, but I'd like to have a little better depth after our top three. Don't know if we'll realistically get it, but I'd prefer it.

 

[darthseinfeld]

I’m loud and wrong. I don’t know where I got that number from. Though that’s abysmal I still feel he made more plays than anyone else in our secondary from his sacks, pressures and tackles for loss.

Different places tracks and define those stats differently

 

[Kwyn]

just to remind people that 70 is league average and look how FEW there are and only ONE score over 80 by Bland

Your point holds true, but 80 is above average.

Here’s how PFF grades

Pro Football Focus (PFF) grades evaluate every NFL player on every play on a 0–100 scale, where 60 is considered average, 70+ is above average, 80+ is good, and 90+ is elite.

 

[Kwyn]

What do these numbers represent?

See right above

I tracked the entire team post bye, which is when we added Quennin

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Different places tracks and define those stats differently

Yeah but I will say I was more so impressed with his tackling than actual coverage skills. And I was more so impressed from a guy we essentially got off the street looked like a more sound tackled than our all pros mainly Diggs,

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Your point holds true, but 80 is above average.

Here’s how PFF grades

Pro Football Focus (PFF) grades evaluate every NFL player on every play on a 0–100 scale, where 60 is considered average, 70+ is above average, 80+ is good, and 90+ is elite.

Analysts assign grades from -2.0 to +2.0 in 0.5 increments based on performance relative to expectation, which are then normalized into the 100-point scale

Their grades are over the place. Corner and quarterback see to rarely get anything in the 80s and 90s.

 

[Gambit]

Are you trying to say giving up a competition rate of 86.5% isnt earning playing time?

Ouch.

In spirit of fairness how did other cbs stack up,?

Really just curious. Ive no dog in this fight

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Well, that's what we should be talking about. I'd prefer that he and Carson not be among our top four next year. Fourth is definitely the highest on the depth chart I would consider either, but I'd like to have a little better depth after our top three. Don't know if we'll realistically get it, but I'd prefer it.

I still hold out hope for Carson especially with a guy like Parker who specializes in getting the most out of corners. I assume Revel, Bland and Carson are our top guys. I’ve been of the belief the take a corner in the first depending on how the draft falls and guys like Downs or whoever don’t fall.

 

[Kwyn]

Their grades are over the place. Corner and quarterback see to rarely get anything in the 80s and 90s.

For what it’s worth, Stafford, Allen and Burrow all *averaged* over 90.

Devon Witherspoon is the only CB to average 90+

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Ouch.

In spirit of fairness how did other cbs stack up,?

Really just curious. Ive no dog in this fight

From what I’ve seen QBs had a lower passer rating when targeting him. I’ve see 99. Everyone else on the team has over 100. I saw Diggs had a 75 percent completion rate.

 

[MapleLeaf]

What do these numbers represent?

How poor the unit performed.