Trade value for Pickens might not be what people are expecting

Right. And before that Odell. It’s much rarer than people think. I think Chase could net a first. Pickens I don’t believe so.
And Amari Cooper ,how is it Amari Cooper, we gave a first for, that was not a bad value, worth more than George Pickens When he said his value went up that's what he meant Maybe coming into the season we gave a third for him He may have valued himself as a second but I believe he's a first round value..

We can't get a first rounder for him i'm probably not trading him but also if that's what the tag will do for you,

You let him seek his value out by doing the franchise tag with the first round tender to where other teams can make offers that you can match or you can pass and accept the offers..

If none of them make offers, then maybe George and David see that they should take a more team friendly deal and stay here this is his best option given he already it's comfortable with the locker room and the coaching and playing alongside Lamb and Brian Schottenheimer is making sure he gets his opportunities..:popcorn:
 
Hes worth a 1st. Period. Otherwise tag and figure it out
Yep.

He’s young, he can dominate, his “bad attitude” is extremely overblown, he’s the best 50/50 ball receiver in the league, and he’s a perfect compliment to a craftier slot receiver.

He’s easily a 1st round pick minimum.

For a 2nd he better come with a starting caliber player. Like a 2nd & a above average starter.
 
Lamb makes $39.9 million a year although with restructuring and moving things around he's only on the books AAV for 34, but you still have to pay the rest of his money in dead cap down the road in void years, or wherever it's gonna workout, you're going to pay the piper, a very high amount when you decide to move on from him...
Lamb makes $34m per season, he signed a 4 year $136m extension, thats $34m per season average. No idea where this $39.9m number is coming from, but its completely false.

I'm sorry but that's not what George is going to sign for Smith money, smith saw his value being next to Brown,

so he signed for 25 or 26 million ,yeah you're not getting George Pickens for that..

so let's stop the nonsense we already pay more for Lamb than Brown gets so the price is going to be more for those two, than they're paying it's going to be more like Jamar Chase and T Higgins ,which is a lot, and guess what they have not won a Super Bowl, Neither did Miami, Miami has that highly paid 1-2 punch they didn't make the playoffs either, Shall we go on, I mean the Rams have two really well paid receivers and yeah they got close but still they didn't make the Super Bowl..

Stop with the comps that don't hold up, Smiths deal doesn't hold up...
You're way oversimplifying things and only looking at APY. Smith signed for less money but more guaranteed money and over a shorter extension.
  • Smith 3 years, $75m ($25m APY) w/ $51m of that guaranteed
  • Higgins 4 years, $115m ($28.75m APY) w/ $40m of that guaranteed
Smith is further down the rankings of top WR contracts, but probably got the more player friendly deal depending on how you look at it. Higgins came away with an extremely team sided contract that makes him disposable after the 2026 season if the Bengals wanted to trade him and try a new formula.

Plus Smith signed in 2024, Higgins in 2025 so the APY can really be explained off by the annual CAP inflation. Another year of inflation (I'll do 10% to keep the math simple) would put a projected deal based off of similar numbers to Smith/Higgins at

4 years/ 126.4m ($31.6 APY). That seems pretty reasonable and around what most of the chatter is, so really a lot of the talk right now is about paying Pickens Smith/Higgins type of money. The big question is going to be where the guarantees are at....Just my opinion but if he were willing to take a smaller guaranteed amount I wouldn't hesitate to pay him $34m per year like you are with Lamb.
 
And Dak did not get him the ball?
Not saying that at all. He did that’s why he had an all pro year. My point was , if a team would trade for him that is a couple good players away. In regard to a trade, Mahomes came to mind ..
 
Most likely that AFC scout works for the Steelers.
 
Yep.

He’s young, he can dominate, his “bad attitude” is extremely overblown, he’s the best 50/50 ball receiver in the league, and he’s a perfect compliment to a craftier slot receiver.

He’s easily a 1st round pick minimum.

For a 2nd he better come with a starting caliber player. Like a 2nd & a above average starter.
If he hadn’t been tagged, he would have been the top free agent on the market.

He creates mismatches that are hard to account for. When you have to double-team him on the outside, that’s one fewer defender in the box, allowing the run game to open up.

Easily a first-round pick, possibly two first-rounders. The Cowboys would be crazy to ask for anything less.
 
I think the other team has to give him a long-term contract. The tag is not transferrable...it's just a one year option for the tagging team. Without the tag he has no contract. Can't play without a contract. He has to sign the tag before he can be traded iirc. No team is going to give up (2) first rounders AND pay him 35 mil/yr. It's just not happening. The Cowboys will be lucky to get ONE first rounder for him in a trade.
Micah Parsons fetched two first-round picks. Kenny Clark—Green Bay was willing to give him a massive contract.

The Raiders are asking for two first-round picks and more for Maxx Crosby. They recently turned down Seattle’s offer of two first-round picks.

If the Raiders don’t get what they want, they will keep him. We will probably do the same with Pickens. The Cowboys would be wise to ask for two first-round picks and some players for him. If not, don’t deal him. He is worth more than that.
 
Yikes!!! You willing to settle on a 2nd best case or possibly just a 3rd and 4th? I'm not!


I’m not buying that one bit - I’m not taking less than a 1st and a late 2nd based on last season. He showed what he can do with a slightly above average QB.
 
Micah Parsons fetched two first-round picks. Kenny Clark—Green Bay was willing to give him a massive contract.

The Raiders are asking for two first-round picks and more for Maxx Crosby. They recently turned down Seattle’s offer of two first-round picks.

If the Raiders don’t get what they want, they will keep him. We will probably do the same with Pickens. The Cowboys would be wise to ask for two first-round picks and some players for him. If not, don’t deal him. He is worth more than that.
I’m betting the Raiders will take less for MC.
 
If that's true, how is he worth a CeeDee contract?
Dallas should offer a 2nd round tender contract to Pickens and his agent then and see how that goes. That might be the top of Pickens market price that other NFL teams would be willing to offer, so Dallas could have a slight discount on their hands.
 
Yikes!!! You willing to settle on a 2nd best case or possibly just a 3rd and 4th? I'm not!


Well, we gave up a 3rd and 5th, receiving a 6th.

And that was with much concern of his negative personal antics. After his best season surely he’s worth more in return.
 
Dallas should offer a 2nd round tender contract to Pickens and his agent then and see how that goes. That might be the top of Pickens market price that other NFL teams would be willing to offer, so Dallas could have a slight discount on their hands.
2nd rounder is a good place to start.
 
I heard a report they turned down 2 1st round picks from the Seahawks. So they are definitely wanting more.
From where?

I can only find the story that they turned down a 1st and 2nd from Seattle. The other site is blocked.

https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/seahawks-trade-proposal-sends-32nd-211041068.html
They didn't. That article says "Tyler Sullivan of CBS Sports presented a trade proposal that would have Seattle send their 32nd and 64th picks to land superstar pass rusher Maxx Crosby."
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,561
Messages
14,545,751
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top