Twitter: Dak Prescott owns the NFC East

[GINeric]

The illogic here is that talking about Dak means you only blame him.

Asinine.

Remember the ol' "Dak retired brady" after that Tampa playoff game? You said NOTHING then. The "Dak gets credit for wins and the team gets the blame for losses" is a real thing. Maybe you partake maybe not...but it's real.

Of course you know I don't take part in that. Ive always expressed my stance on what TEAMS do, not one or two players and thats in WINS AND LOSSES. The only time I bring up the whole "Dak retired Brady" thing is to use the trolls own narratives against them and make them embarrass themselves by their hypocrisy and double standards using THEIR logic.

I just silenced an un-named person here who had this "quarterback vs quarterback head to head" thing as a measurement as to which quarterback was better because their team won the match game.

So I told that "un-named" person, that Aaron Rodgers is 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo, so according to their logic/narrative, Garoppolo is obviously better, correct? Well let's just say that its amazing when people create narratives for Cowboys players, they run, hide and duck the same questions like lil *****es, USING THEIR OWN NARRATIVES for other NFL players in the same identical situations.

 

[zrinkill]

Well this thread will be closed soon ........ the racial stuff has already started.

 

[McKDaddy]

Oh I thought it was rhetorical. Yeah I think he plays that well. Thought that was obvious lol.

the question was about love or pay

 

[GINeric]

And yet his supporters consistently argue that we can't find a better QB to get us more than a .500 record against non-divisional teams.

What is "his supporters"? Cowboys fans support Cowboys players and cheer for them to do well and help us win games. How dumb is it to support a specific team but don't support its players..... since when do fans of a team root against their own players on their "supposed" favorite team?

 

[OGSixshooter]

There have been games where he hasn't played well and wasnh8s fault. I never said he didn't carry any fault.

But to DDS crowd, if everyone doesn't blame Dak for everything 100% of the time or more, they are saying he never is at fault..

To you its either 0% or 100%. The middle doesn't exist for DDS

Wouldn't you say most of those games came in the playoffs? Both SF games, the Packers game...and even the Rams game...Dak was atrocious.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Hard to believe we’ve wasted so many playoff and SB rosters. Most QBs would be at least 100-38-1 and flip that playoff record to 5-2.

Put a non-choking QB on the 2016, 2019, 2022, 2023, and 2024 rosters...and who knows what the results would be.

 

[Vtwin]

So you are complaining why a rookie didnt make a play, going against a HOF type QB event hough we scored enough points to win it.

And you just proved my point for me. You blamed Dak but not the defenses that literally had three chances to make a play, yet they allowed three big plays after another.

So defense not at fault. And Dak the rookie carries all the fault.

Got it.

No. You don't got it. In fact, you're doing exactly what i'm not doing.

Dak didn't "go against a HOF type QB". Dak went against the 32 ranked pass defense. Dak had a first down inside the 15 and threw three straight incompletions resulting in 3 instead of 7. Giving him a pass because he was a rookie is just so Dak apologetic.

Still, he had another chance with the game on the line. He went three and out. Wasted 1st down to stop the clock instead of just handing the ball to his all world running back behind his all world line against the tired and rushed defense. (Remember that decision when Rodgers had time to light up the defense for the game winning FG.) Ended up settling for the FG to tie the game.

By the way. The defense actually almost saved Daks butt after he threw that horrible, completely telegraphed int. They got a pick of their own on the ensuing GB drive to give Dak another chance, which he squandered.

ONE play from Dak secures the win. He had the running game going. He had the o-line going. He choked away the first half (as usual) and fell short on a comeback (as usual) even though the cards fell in his favor.

Gaslighting me by repeating the revisionist history that I don't share the blame with the defense is just more irrational apologist behavior. Either you can't or won't read because I clearly identified the "other weakness" as the defense.

It comes down to the fact that you excuse Dak for being a rookie. Just another excuse. Dak had a better defense than Rodgers did. If Dak wasn't up to the task he shouldn't have been out there. He was out there though so the rookie excuse just doesn't fly.

Dak was just as big a reason for not winning that game as the defense was.

And no. They didn't score enough points to win. That's why they lost.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

the question was about love or pay

Mck like I said earlier, when you say things like is it “love” or “pay” and then scream someone is confrontational? You’re doing exactly what you’re excusing others on. That’s like me saying is it hate or are you just that hateful? It’s gonna trigger a certain response. You don’t want to talk football so what is it?

 

[OGSixshooter]

He is lol. You guys are arguing over something no one is lol. Dak is in part the reason for her success and lack there of. You guys just arguing over nothing lol.

Good enough for me. So who was the person screaming "Get ya money Dak!!!" and blaming Jerry for Dak's greed? If you're loyal to the Cowboys, kinda hard to cheer for a QB who is the definition of "mid" outside his division.

What kind of person advocates for that guy to exploit his favorite team?

 

[OGSixshooter]

No. You don't got it. In fact, you're doing exactly what i'm not doing.

Dak didn't "go against a HOF type QB". Dak went against the 32 ranked pass defense. Dak had a first down inside the 15 and threw three straight incompletions resulting in 3 instead of 7. Giving him a pass because he was a rookie is just so Dak apologetic.

Still, he had another chance with the game on the line. He went three and out. Wasted 1st down to stop the clock instead of just handing the ball to his all world running back behind his all world line against the tired and rushed defense. (Remember that decision when Rodgers had time to light up the defense for the game winning FG.) Ended up settling for the FG to tie the game.

By the way. The defense actually almost saved Daks butt after he threw that horrible, completely telegraphed int. They got a pick of their own on the ensuing GB drive to give Dak another chance, which he squandered.

ONE play from Dak secures the win. He had the running game going. He had the o-line going. He choked away the first half (as usual) and fell short on a comeback (as usual) even though the cards fell in his favor.

Gaslighting me by repeating the revisionist history that I don't share the blame with the defense is just more irrational apologist behavior. Either you can't or won't read because I clearly identified the "other weakness" as the defense.

It comes down to the fact that you excuse Dak for being a rookie. Just another excuse. Dak had a better defense than Rodgers did. If Dak wasn't up to the task he shouldn't have been out there. He was out there though so the rookie excuse just doesn't fly.

Dak was just as big a reason for not winning that game as the defense was.

And no. They didn't score enough points to win. That's why they lost.

"He choked away the first half (as usual) and fell short on a comeback (as usual) even though the cards fell in his favor."

How is it that this obvious pattern escapes them?

 

[GINeric]

I never saw Tom Brady or Patrick Mahomes single handedly carry a team to a championship. Both teams had SB defenses and a great coach.

Mahomes is the best quarterback in the NFL and couldn't "carry his team" to a regular season win vs us and we had the worst defense in the NFL.

Intelligent people know that this isn't any indictments on how great Mahomes is, its just another perfect example of how much of a TEAM game football really is.

No NFL quarterback in history has ever won a preseason game, regular season game, playoff game, or Superbowl by himself and they never will.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Of course you know I don't take part in that. Ive always expressed my stance on what TEAMS do, not one or two players and thats in WINS AND LOSSES. The only time I bring up the whole "Dak retired Brady" thing is to use the trolls own narratives against them and make them embarrass themselves by their hypocrisy and double standards using THEIR logic.

I just silenced an un-named person here who had this "quarterback vs quarterback head to head" thing as a measurement as to which quarterback was better because their team won the match game.

So I told that "un-named" person, that Aaron Rodgers is 0-4 vs Jimmy Garoppolo, so according to their logic/narrative, Garoppolo is obviously better, correct? Well let's just say that its amazing when people create narratives for Cowboys players, they run, hide and duck the same questions like lil *****es, USING THEIR OWN NARRATIVES for other NFL players in the same identical situations.

And I have already tried to explain to you...that there are times a player goes above and beyond his assignment (or maybe just DOES it instead of failing) and changes the course of the game....one way or another.

A single play / player can and HAS won and lost games. Knowing there's a sequence of events leading up to it changes very little about it.

Why do they keep player stats?

Why does one player get MVP (or runner up)?

because (most ) peopl eknow a single player/play can influence a game and season....that is the only reason.


Yes we get it...a center has to hike the ball to the QB so he can throw Immaculate Reception. We get it.

But if you cannot grasp the simple concept of player/play imporatnce assessment...I just don't know what to tell you. It's very odd. I think you know. I htink you are playing devils advocate here here.

If it were any other player...you;d prolly say "yep dat boy just won the game" or just ignore it all together. But...it's Dak. And he's getting picked on!

Like every other QB ever. You don't have to like it...just facts.

 

[DallasEast]

Well, for you and your argument...I can dig.and pick a very specific stat ina very specific time frame to make any point i want.

Fact is Dallas has choked in mediocrity for 30 years...Dak is just the latest. But I get it. You want to raz on Dak and anything else isnirrelevant to you.

Every NFL calendar does not end with the regular season. The OP tweet singled out one player and assigned a win/loss record over NFC East opponents during the regular season only. My comment was:

NFC East Teams' Ownership Records of the National Football Conference | 2016-Present

3-0 Philadelphia Eagles
0-1 Washington
0-0 Dallas Cowboys
0-0 New York Giants

I substituted what the four NFC East teams did in the postseason during the same timeframe. Postseason will always be more relevant for every team in every team sport having a postseason. In truth, I have "razed" every annual incarnation Jerry Jones has overseen and trotted out onto the field since Jimmy Johnson influence on it died, which includes 2016 to this very day.

Nowhere in this thread have I isolated and slighted Dak Prescott. In fact, you and every single individual on Earth will be hard-pressed to find a significant number of posts where I have demeaned or belittled or have even done the "2-5 thang" as a negative towards him alone on this site.

Heck, I call the man Dak Prescott. Not Dak. I do not know the man. I was raised to call people by their entire name or last name if I use their names. That is my way of respecting him and anyone else. For the love of pete, I 99% call Jerry Jones Jerry Jones or Jones. And whenever I do disrespect that guy, I usually call him Mad Genius.

Not everyone here engages in these quarterback reindeer games, but dismiss my reply as a total lie. Some people in this world cannot help themselves.



CowboysZone

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Good enough for me. So who was the person screaming "Get ya money Dak!!!" and blaming Jerry for Dak's greed? If you're loyal to the Cowboys, kinda hard to cheer for a QB who is the definition of "mid" outside his division.

What kind of person advocates for that guy to exploit his favorite team?

Me. I’m the kind of person. Anymore questions lol?

 

[McKDaddy]

Mck like I said earlier, when you say things like is it “love” or “pay” and then scream someone is confrontational? You’re doing exactly what you’re excusing others on. That’s like me saying is it hate or are you just that hateful? It’s gonna trigger a certain response. You don’t want to talk football so what is it?

Like I said, you won't answer questions no matter how simple they are.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Me. I’m the kind of person. Anymore questions lol?

Cool...bookmarked. You admit it's Dak > Cowboys. All I ever asked is keep it 8 more than 92...

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Like I said, you won't answer questions no matter how simple they are.

I literally answered you question…..It’s not my “love” or “pay”. What makes you think Dak or whoever would pay for posts on this site? What are you doing right now? You can’t be serious lol.

 

[RonWashington]

Off-Season has a long way to go.

One month to Oxnard

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Cool...bookmarked. You admit it's Dak > Cowboys. All I ever asked is keep it 8 more than 92...

Yep please bookmark it pistol Pete. Thanks. I don’t know what 8 or 92 represents.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

One month to Oxnard

Damn it’s creeping up quick.