Twitter: Dak Prescott's place in Cowboys QB History

you're arguing an "is" when we are talking about "ought". It's a subtle, but sophomoric slight of hand.

Does Dak have agency? Yes or No.

Did Did use his agent and agency to be the highest paid player? Yes or No.

Does Dak claim that he cares about winning over money? Yes or No.

Does Dak keep structuring his contracts to keep coming back to free agency so he can extort the team? Yes or No.

See...money wasn't the issue with Jerry. It's the years on the contract. And Dak wanted to keep this crap up....but instead of blaming the person whose behavior belies their claim...you insult me and attack others.

So yeah...sophomoric. juvenile. pathetic. Low-IQ Machiavellianism.
I’ve really tried with you but I’ve vibe to realize you’re just a troll and an idiot. You act like it was Dak’s back account he took the money out of. He did all those things like almost all players in every sport worldwide. Why didn’t Jerry sign Micah or give a contract to Pickens? BECAUSE IT’S HIS DAMN MONEY. I don’t care what his reasoning is and you’re probably right about the years. But so what?

PS - I didn’t like Dak’s comments either, but it doesn’t change the facts.
 
I’ve really tried with you but I’ve vibe to realize you’re just a troll and an idiot. You act like it was Dak’s back account he took the money out of. He did all those things like almost all players in every sport worldwide. Why didn’t Jerry sign Micah or give a contract to Pickens? BECAUSE IT’S HIS DAMN MONEY. I don’t care what his reasoning is and you’re probably right about the years. But so what?

PS - I didn’t like Dak's comments either, but it doesn’t change the facts.
And I gave you "yes" or "no" simple questions...to which you took offense. Hmmm....

Dak is a victim - Jerry outmaneuvered Dak and everyone to make Dak the highest paid. Poor Dak.
 
And I gave you "yes" or "no" simple questions...to which you took offense. Hmmm....

Dak is a victim - Jerry outmaneuvered Dak and everyone to make Dak the highest paid. Poor Dak.
Is there a third person in this convo? Do you hear voices in your head? You keep referring to comments and opinions that I’ve never made or stated. Are you Smeagol or Gollum?
 
Is there a third person in this convo? Do you hear voices in your head? You keep referring to comments and opinions that I’ve never made or stated. Are you Smeagol or Gollum?
Yes or No. If the question is simple, the answer is always easy.

Does Dak have agency? Yes or No.

Did Did use his agent and agency to be the highest paid player? Yes or No.

Does Dak claim that he cares about winning over money? Yes or No.

Does Dak keep structuring his contracts to keep coming back to free agency so he can extort the team? Yes or No.
 
Thats just dumb. He took a paycheck and that’s “grape and pillage”
Look up what those words mean and imply. Everytime he has some leverage and can show what he's made of...he does. Greed and hypocrisy.
 
Ultimately Roger and Troy are 1-2, although some may disagree on the order. Meredith, White, Tony and Dak are the candidates for the next 4 spots and I think a reasonable argument can be made for any order you put them in.
I put Danny at the top of "the rest" but your point stands. For me, the other 4 are judged by:

Playoffs - Danny White
NFC East dominance - Dak...so far. That's about to change tho...just like it did for McNabb in his later years.
Moxy - Romo
Meredith - before my time, but grits and smarts.
 
Is there a third person in this convo? Do you hear voices in your head? You keep referring to comments and opinions that I’ve never made or stated. Are you Smeagol or Gollum?
Honestly...you do the VERY same thing. No offense intended but I did find out for myself.
 
Yes or No. If the question is simple, the answer is always easy.



Did Did use his agent and agency to be the highest paid player? Yes or No.
No. But of course Jerry broke out the contract and check for highest paid player ever without one single negotiation.

:facepalm::muttley:

and of COURSE nobody necessarily BLAMES Dak for it. But...doesn't change facts.
 
Yes or No. If the question is simple, the answer is always easy.

Does Dak have agency? Yes or No.

Did Did use his agent and agency to be the highest paid player? Yes or No.

Does Dak claim that he cares about winning over money? Yes or No.

Does Dak keep structuring his contracts to keep coming back to free agency so he can extort the team? Yes or No.
So Jerry didn’t structure the deal. Dak made the contract and signed it and paid himself out of Jerry’s bank account all on his own. Okay if that’s what you believe.
 
Honestly...you do the VERY same thing. No offense intended but I did find out for myself.
People like you live in an alternate universe and accuse others of what they do. And I mean that respectfully as I don’t really think you’re a bad guy. Maybe just misguided.
 
I’ve never said Dak wasn’t over paid. I’ve stated it many times so you’re arguing with yourself. I’ve also stated many times that Jerry should have let Dak walk. It’s Jerry’s bank account and no one else’s. PERIOD.
You seem to try and walk both sides of the line and claim you don't take a side but your statements often carry some obvious implications even though not directly stated, so it appears you do take a side.

This exchange I'm butting in to started here with your response to a poster suggesting Dak is held to a higher standard because of how much he is paid. You replied with this.
Nope. He didn’t pay himself.
Then you doubled down in another post with this.
The blame goes 100% to Jerry for caving.
When the convo turned to even more specifically call out Dak for fighting for every single cent he could get while also setting himself up for the quickest possible next bite at the apple you replied with this.
You act like it was Dak’s back account he took the money out of. He did all those things like almost all players in every sport worldwide.
And this.
So Jerry didn’t structure the deal. Dak made the contract and signed it and paid himself out of Jerry’s bank account all on his own. Okay if that’s what you believe.
You did include a couple one liners about how you believe Dak is paid too much, but the vast majority of your statements come across as heavily pro Prescott. This is what makes it hard to take your self-professed 'middle ground' declarations seriously.

A true middle ground approach would have no trouble recognizing that multiple things can be true. So while you are right that Jerry had the ability to not write that check and that decision falls on him, it is also just as true that Prescott turned down four very legitimate and fair offers in order to squeeze every single last penny out of Jerry.

Bottom line is it is very fair to claim Jerry was an idiot for giving Dak the big contracts AND Prescott was selfish and greedy in his negotiations, AND Prescott gaslit the fans with his comments about not playing for the money.

All of that is true but you are only arguing in favor of the first one and against the other two.

At least that's the way it comes across.
 
Ultimately Roger and Troy are 1-2, although some may disagree on the order. Meredith, White, Tony and Dak are the candidates for the next 4 spots and I think a reasonable argument can be made for any order you put them in.

Agreed.
Not sure why some get into heated debates over this. Dak's book isn't written yet. Still has a chance to possibly lead the team deep. Maybe he makes a CC/SB game or maybe he doesn't.
But 3-6 aren't set in stone cause.
 
You seem to try and walk both sides of the line and claim you don't take a side but your statements often carry some obvious implications even though not directly stated, so it appears you do take a side.

This exchange I'm butting in to started here with your response to a poster suggesting Dak is held to a higher standard because of how much he is paid. You replied with this.

Then you doubled down in another post with this.

When the convo turned to even more specifically call out Dak for fighting for every single cent he could get while also setting himself up for the quickest possible next bite at the apple you replied with this.

And this.

You did include a couple one liners about how you believe Dak is paid too much, but the vast majority of your statements come across as heavily pro Prescott. This is what makes it hard to take your self-professed 'middle ground' declarations seriously.

A true middle ground approach would have no trouble recognizing that multiple things can be true. So while you are right that Jerry had the ability to not write that check and that decision falls on him, it is also just as true that Prescott turned down four very legitimate and fair offers in order to squeeze every single last penny out of Jerry.

Bottom line is it is very fair to claim Jerry was an idiot for giving Dak the big contracts AND Prescott was selfish and greedy in his negotiations, AND Prescott gaslit the fans with his comments about not playing for the money.

All of that is true but you are only arguing in favor of the first one and against the other two.

At least that's the way it comes across.
You are absolutely correct that I’m arguing one issue. I don’t not feel like mentioning something we all already know. Was he selfish? Yes. Did Dak gaslight the fans? Yes, but I don’t care since I don’t listen to what teams, players, or media say anymore. So I’m arguing the one issue that we don’t seem to agree on. Maybe not you, but OG is acting like Dak stole Jerry’s money. You want to have a convo about Dak’s other issues, that’s fine but it will be short since we agree. I hope this helps you understand where I’m coming from as your initial impression was dead wrong.

I also think your assumptions are based on your years on the forum and me being new. There are many here who live in the extremes and are the most vocal. I am no where near either side and if you take my comments at face value, I think you will understand me better.
 
People like you live in an alternate universe and accuse others of what they do.
You would EXACTLY know!

I just went through like 4 pages with you and had to remind you of our orginal disagreement.
'
So don't lecture me, kid.

You questioned people's fandom then said you werent; questioning people fandom.
Seems like some of you are fans of other teams.
I’m not questioning anything.
Act like you don't know what that means.
 
People like you live in an alternate universe and accuse others of what they do. And I mean that respectfully as I don’t really think you’re a bad guy. Maybe just misguided.
Oh..and LOL... "people like you". "misguided".

Because people don't agree with YOU...they HAVE to be "misguided". Well thank YOU Mr. Internet Psychologist.

Rest of my reply backspaced to save bandwidth and get back on topic.
 
I’ve really tried with you but I’ve vibe to realize you’re just a troll and an idiot. You act like it was Dak’s back account he took the money out of. He did all those things like almost all players in every sport worldwide. Why didn’t Jerry sign Micah or give a contract to Pickens? BECAUSE IT’S HIS DAMN MONEY. I don’t care what his reasoning is and you’re probably right about the years. But so what?

PS - I didn’t like Dak’s comments either, but it doesn’t change the facts.
"You're not a real fan", "You're a troll and an idiot". Such highbrow debate you provide. You're not even particularly skilled at this.
 
I don’t give a crap about your gaslighting. Don’t you get it? I’ve never said Dak wasn’t over paid. I’ve stated it many times so you’re arguing with yourself. I’ve also stated many times that Jerry should have let Dak walk. It’s Jerry’s bank account and no one else’s. PERIOD.
Again, you blame Jerry for Dak's scheming. THAT ALONE exposes your secret hiding place for your Dak Standom. It's OK to criticize Jerry, but leave my Pet Player alone!!!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,635
Messages
14,549,013
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top