TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 102,668
- Reaction score
- 91,765
These people are nuts lol.Shoot, after reading these last several pages I'm excited to drink and go driving now! I feel good about this!
These people are nuts lol.Shoot, after reading these last several pages I'm excited to drink and go driving now! I feel good about this!
So he refused an intoxication test but then did take the field sobriety test which he failed.just a traffic citation in Wisconsin.
https://nypost.com/2026/07/27/sport...-refusing-intoxication-test-after-owi-arrest/
Every state is different. Even though his first offense isn't criminal, he refused testing. His license will be revoked for a year. He might even need to put that ignition thingy that you breathe in to start his car.just a traffic citation in Wisconsin.
https://nypost.com/2026/07/27/sport...-refusing-intoxication-test-after-owi-arrest/
yeah i wasnt gonna mention that as i didnt know if that law was applied in WI. But in NY state if you dont take test you get charged plus lose license for a year.Every state is different. Even though his first offense isn't criminal, he refused testing. His license will be revoked for a year. He might even need to put that ignition thingy that you breathe in to start his car.
Dunno. Just made a general comment about what alcohol (not specifically about Romo) does to a person since it was under discussion because some people think drunks (or anyone under a significant influence of alcohol) should be making reasonable decisions.WHo said it was alcohol?
we don’t know. The official police report hasn’t been posted online yet.So he refused an intoxication test but then did take the field sobriety test which he failed.
According to the article, he was issued a citation for refusing to take the test. Easy enough to verify.we don’t know. The official police report hasn’t been posted online yet.
The arrest log only says OWI, failed field sobriety.
Not charged with open container either.
The reason some speculate that isn’t wasn’t alcohol is because of the timeline.
The golf tournament ended around 4:30PM. Then the trophy.
If he left at 5PM, he only had 15-25 minutes to drink. Stop to get gas, smash a few cans. Then drive.
The bridge he was pulled over on at 6:18PM is about an hour away.
Given his back problems, he may have taken a muscle relaxer or some sort of pain meds before the drive.
Nothing illegal, as he would have been cited for it.
The topic is romo being arrested for impaired driving. The arrest never mentioned alcohol. No bac. No reason at all. Judging karens tell us he was hammered. Don't fall in.Dunno. Just made a general comment about what alcohol (not specifically about Romo) does to a person since it was under discussion because some people think drunks (or anyone under a significant influence of alcohol) should be making reasonable decisions.
Like this guy...making up ******** in his head and trying to convince you thats what happened.According to the article, he was issued a citation for refusing to take the test. Easy enough to verify.
And with everything you've been saying he could have just as easily been pissed at his performance, started drinking at the tournament or elsewhere because he left early due to being pissed and had more than enough time to be sauced and get pulled over at 6:18pm. Or yes, used that spare 25 minutes to drink before being pulled over. I mean, take your pick.
Lol. Wut?Like this guy...making up ******** in his head and trying to convince you thats what happened.
This is one sad pathetic unhappy human being tearing down other people with lies to make herself feel better.
What do you mean "wut"? You making up ******** in your head is wut.Lol. Wut?
Sure I am. But is the Captain Save-A-Romo version the only acceptable speculation? There's another guy dang near saying Romo got roofied as part of some conspiracy targeting and where were you? Oh right. A Captain Save-A-Romo version, so it's allowed. Lol.What do you mean "wut"? You making up ******** in your head is wut.
I think the story is somewhere in the middle. I am saying I don't know and neither do you.Sure I am. But is the Captain Save-A-Romo version the only acceptable speculation? There's another guy dang near saying Romo got roofied as part of some conspiracy targeting and where were you? Oh right. A Captain Save-A-Romo version, so it's allowed. Lol.
He's a millionaire. He doesn't need free car service.SMH These guys have access to free NFL car services and still drive drunk.
And only players on rosters are eligible to that, I believe.He's a millionaire. He doesn't need free car service.
That was his first mistake.Milwaukee?

I think you're right, but it doesn't matter. If someone is drinking they shouldn't be driving. And he certainly doesn't have cost as an excuse.And only players on rosters are eligible to that, I believe.
I don't think you can handle that, bro. You literally just lashed out at a post speculating that was in response to someone else speculating but only chose to target the response speculation. I mean, if you were trying to appear neutral on the topic like it seems, I think the curtain blew aside revealing what was behind it. Lol.I think the story is somewhere in the middle. I am saying I don't know and neither do you.
I can handle that. How about you?
We dont even know if it's alcohol, rx, or fatigue. Why not wait to see?
