Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 35,235
- Reaction score
- 62,826
You sound jealous.......You can see the motivation leave their eyes the moment they sign those massive deals.
Money goes up, availability goes down.
You sound jealous.......You can see the motivation leave their eyes the moment they sign those massive deals.
Money goes up, availability goes down.
In my opinion, but it's not the players causing teams to charge more. It's teams always pushing that envelope to extract as much as possible from fans. And networks throwing out stupid numbers to keep up to 2 games on per Sunday or have rights to Thurs/Monday games.Some people will continue to say "Get yo bag, son" and " Don't worry about another man money" until those same people wont be able to afford game tickets or streaming fees.
Just waiting for the NFL to no longer allow free game viewing on antenna tv.
Eventually the NFL will grease enough palms of the jabronis in congress to have less oversight than they do now.
Hmmm....not sure this puts QW
It's not like the price has gone up.That’s why Jerry should have done it before free agency like everyone in the football world was suggesting
This is a demonstrated trend with the cowboys
You think?If he has another PB/ or dare I say AP season he's going to be gunning for #1.
He’s only been in the league 3 years so saying oh only one off year is 33 percent of his career lol.He most certainly is. He had one slightly off year but he’s just entering his prime.
Why would QW do it?That’s why Jerry should have done it before free agency like everyone in the football world was suggesting
This is a demonstrated trend with the cowboys
When you look at how much TV money and merchandizing money the teams get, there is no excuse for ticket prices being this high.In my opinion, but it's not the players causing teams to charge more. It's teams always pushing that envelope to extract as much as possible from fans. And networks throwing out stupid numbers to keep up to 2 games on per Sunday or have rights to Thurs/Monday games.
The CBA allows for a 48.5-51.5 split between players and owners.
Players are getting more simply because the NFL is making tons of money yearly, bumping up total revenue and then the salary cap.
The T.V deals are absurd, with each franchise getting $452mil a year from the networks/sponsors alone. Ticket prices now aren't due to poor owners having to raise prices to keep the lights on.
Outside of the Packers, who are 100% publicly owned, teams can make more money instantly selling small shares of the team.
It's the NFL's greed causing the rise in ticket and streaming prices. Not the player trying to make millions when the owner's net worth starts with a B.
Not to mention the NFL is one of the few to have a cap hit not equal salary hit. So you can have teams with fake dead cap hits eat up the cap space when the actual salary is much less.
Teams like the Eagles ownership don't care about paying more salary vs cap hit to keep the team competitive.
When you look at how much TV money and merchandizing money the teams get, there is no excuse for ticket prices being this high.
and its counterproductive. The fans that come to to the games are the most loyal of all; outside of course the corporate ones.
Me not like capitalism?You seem to have a problem with free market capitalism. Its weird that this always comes out with sports and players salaries. And not in actual poltics. Bc the second people ask corporations to pay more in taxes, so other things can be paid for? People start losing their minds. But its a problem when supply demand dictates the supply that allows them to price out the affordablitity for some people.
Like the responder said. For $200 a year you can get Sunday Ticket which gives you access to every game and more. I cant talk about another persons finances. But thats cheaper than going to see 1 game on average.
But people are pocket watching other grown men and talking about being "priced out". Sunday ticket is cheaper and more accessible than its EVER been. What the heck do some of yall even be talking about?
Make it make sense.
.....I love Free market, the constitution and especially the 2nd amendment but I also recognize that the salaries affect the final product cost which is way over the rate of inflation that affects most fans.....especially in ticket salesI dont begrudge the players.....its the system in its entirety that has now priced out many hard working folks from attending a game.In my opinion, but it's not the players causing teams to charge more. It's teams always pushing that envelope to extract as much as possible from fans. And networks throwing out stupid numbers to keep up to 2 games on per Sunday or have rights to Thurs/Monday games.
The CBA allows for a 48.5-51.5 split between players and owners.
Players are getting more simply because the NFL is making tons of money yearly, bumping up total revenue and then the salary cap.
The T.V deals are absurd, with each franchise getting $452mil a year from the networks/sponsors alone. Ticket prices now aren't due to poor owners having to raise prices to keep the lights on.
Outside of the Packers, who are 100% publicly owned, teams can make more money instantly selling small shares of the team.
It's the NFL's greed causing the rise in ticket and streaming prices. Not the player trying to make millions when the owner's net worth starts with a B.
Not to mention the NFL is one of the few to have a cap hit not equal salary hit. So you can have teams with fake dead cap hits eat up the cap space when the actual salary is much less.
Teams like the Eagles ownership don't care about paying more salary vs cap hit to keep the team competitive.
You’re telling no lies. I’m always amazed having these conversations and how people side with corporations.You seem to have a problem with free market capitalism. Its weird that this always comes out with sports and players salaries. And not in actual poltics. Bc the second people ask corporations to pay more in taxes, so other things can be paid for? People start losing their minds. But its a problem when supply demand dictates the supply that allows them to price out the affordablitity for some people.
Like the responder said. For $200 a year you can get Sunday Ticket which gives you access to every game and more. I cant talk about another persons finances. But thats cheaper than going to see 1 game on average.
But people are pocket watching other grown men and talking about being "priced out". Sunday ticket is cheaper and more accessible than its EVER been. What the heck do some of yall even be talking about?
Make it make sense.
Not even a "top 6" ?Damn. I didn’t know Howie handed out deals like this. Carter isn’t even a top 6 guy and he has been questionable on the field with some antics…
The article says he was hurt all last season. That makes sense...because just the year before he was the most frightening defensive player in the leagueYet he wasnt even close to beign the best DT on his own team last season. His numbers down pretty bad.
for many, yes. But not most.You can see the motivation leave their eyes the moment they sign those massive deals.
Money goes up, availability goes down.
Appreciate the explanationThe NFLPA union contract gives players a 50% cut of revenue, give or take a few points. Workers at most places don't have a CBA that ties their wages to company revenue like that. And revenues at most big companies have grown a lot faster than their wages have.
Frankly, I would say that it's not that NFL players are getting paid too much, they're just keeping up with whatever the league earns. The problem is that wages for American workers aren't keeping up with what their employers earn.
My current company isn't publicly traded, and doesn't publish their financials. But looking at my last gig (they laid me off in 2023), their revenue went up 13% between 2024 and 2025. I sure as hell never saw a 13% annual raise while working there.
Makes sense. Gotta love capitalism huhScarcity. That question is better answered from an economic rather than financial perspective. The average 'qualified' white collar worker is more plentiful in supply and (respectfully) far more easily replaceable.
Ergo, larger supply = smaller demand
In contrast, the professional 'qualified' sports athlete (e.g. someone capable of performing satisfactorily at the professional level) are far fewer in number. Leagues are continually seeking newer blood who can play at the highest level.
Smaller supply = larger demand
An industry (the NFL in this instance) will devote whatever percentage of its revenue it deems fit to meet the level of demand. In pro football, quarterbacks meet the highest demand by owners collectively. An owner will either pay or refuse whatever $$$ figure presented to them by any player--either per their singular personal want or perceived need.
The present system is geared towards players continually shopping themselves for the highest possible compensation. If an owner feels a player is an irreplaceable asset for their team, they will sign the contract or attempt to beat their competition to the punch. The same holds true if an owner feels their want exceeds any real need for acquiring a player.
Finally, an owner will satisfy their want or need up to whatever maximum spending expenditure they pre-determine as 'safe'. They may even stress their salary cap mandates to do so. Ever increasing revenue helps them accomplish their acquisition goals.
Not even a "top 6" ?
Random question....why 6? Most people stick with Top 5...Top 10...or (like with Dak), Top 20... nice standard benchmarks
But you chose 6.
I'd like to examine your brain one day when your dead. If I discover something, I'll name the syndrome/condition after you. Does that...plus $50, sound good?
P.S. he's the best DT in the league when he's healthy. TBD if he returns to 2024 health though. WE BETTER HOPE NOT!
