Blackrain
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,050
- Reaction score
- 13,236
My brother I'm going to have to disagree with you hard on this one leadership is not irrelevant we have had talented players that were not leaders.Easy answer. Talent. Leadership is irrelevant w/o a talented team.
Leadership is one of those grey buzzwords that really doesn't mean much. Same as calling a player a "winner". Just BSPN garble, that's all it is.
Players can be talented but if they aren't willing to sacrifice for the greater good of the team they can't be leaders.
Leaders are able to make men follow them and play above their heads at all times.
Let's take Roger Staubach and Micah Parsons both incredibly talented players. One did The impossible in the biggest moments the other turned into a ghost when the lights were brightest
One is a leader of men the other is a dog that hunts for himself.
True leaders are one of the most valuable things you can have on the team because they make less talented players look better than they really are and play over their heads.
Many talented players just care about their own statistics preserving their career getting the biggest contract.
True leaders care about winning championships getting all the rest of their team to play at a high level lead by example coach other players up and make them better.
Talented players many times just concentrate on not making any mistakes and purely their own game. And statistics capitalizing on garbage time to increase their value.
Leaders are capable of making up for other people's mistakes and pulling the rabbit out of the hat.
True leaders show their value in the biggest moments rise to the occasion and make clutch plays when it matters.
We have not had anybody of this caliber in such a long time people have gotten used to just tolerating talented players.
I've watched the best of cowboy football and know a leader when I see one as well as their value to the team.
