Dak's complete regular-season and postseason record broken down

[SteveTheCowboy]

They also blame all the losses on Dak, but never give him credit for a win.

No..."they" don't.

If you're in a Dak thread, and you have to go through every single other problem first before getting to Dak (so "they" don't think you're only blaming just Dak)...

somethign is wrong.

We all blame defense, Jerry, coaching...some even want Rowdy GONE.

It could be a handful of radicals...hardly deserving of "they" disignation, as if it ubiquitous). Even Romo suffers from the same thing a decade later.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

So football is a team sport. But when Dallas loses, it is all Dak's fault?
The hate is real.

That isn't what he said.

 

[jazzcat22]

That isn't what he said.

Seems like it to me. Read the last line again. It came down to Dak performances. More so in the playoffs. But there were other factors. How about Diggs not laying out Kittle to cause an incompletion. That was HUGE.

 

[OGSixshooter]

right or wrong there's confirmation bias so stats will always help to offset that unless you just refuse to adjust your own opinion.

As long as the people using the stats have also checked for their bias as well. Otherwise it's the blind leading the blind.

 

[OGSixshooter]

Seems like it to me. Read the last line again. It came down to Dak performances. More so in the playoffs. But there were other factors. How about Diggs not laying out Kittle to cause an incompletion. That was HUGE.

"to you". Because you read into my post and considered how you needed to correct me and not my points. "hate" is not a counterpoint...it's a definitive statement about my state of mind. Nothing to do with my post really...everything to do with the poster.

 

[jazzcat22]

"to you". Because you read into my post and considered how you needed to correct me and not my points. "hate" is not a counterpoint...it's a definitive statement about my state of mind. Nothing to do with my post really...everything to do with the poster.

WINNING MATTERS...and the eye test tells us that when we need Dak the most he does not play WINNING FOOTBALL.

How else is this to be interpreted? Your words, not mine. Indicationg all on Dak. Nothing mentioned about the teams play.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

WINNING MATTERS...and the eye test tells us that when we need Dak the most he does not play WINNING FOOTBALL.

How else is this to be interpreted? Your words, not mine. Indicationg all on Dak. Nothing mentioned about the teams play.

Like I said...you have to go through every other problem FIRST before getting to Dak. . It's a Dak thread where you better not say anything about Dak!

He didn't even mention wins and losses.

Are you saying Dak played excellent in ALL the "big games"?

Otherwise you are drawing conclusions ("interpretting"!) on your own..not what was said.

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

Yay another Dak thread.

That’s kind of my thing . He’s had a kind of boring career. Jsut this above average quarterback and a bunch of 10-7 type seasons.


I think they stumbled onto something here tho with vet trades. We’ll see if they add 2 more vet pieces and stabilize this thing and give dak the resources a man of his limited skill set would require to win an entire *** Super Bowl

 

[jazzcat22]

Like I said...you have to go through every other problem FIRST before getting to Dak. . It's a Dak thread where you better not say anything about Dak!

He didn't even mention wins and losses.

Are you saying Dak played excellent in ALL the "big games"?

Otherwise you are drawing conclusions ("interpretting"!) on your own..not what was said.

I am in no way saying Dak played well in ALL big games.

Read his words again. How can that not be interpreted in any other way. No drawing conclusions from it. It was straight forward.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

I am in no way saying Dak played well in ALL big games.

Read his words again. How can that not be interpreted in any other way. No drawing conclusions from it. It was straight forward.

"Straight forward"?

"WINNING MATTERS...and the eye test tells us that when we need Dak the most he does not play WINNING FOOTBALL."


He said "Dak does not play winninig football".

Is that true or not?

Anything else is an assumption on the reader's part. For example, blaming ONLY Dak for the losses was never said. If you think it's implied, that's YOUR "intepretation".

"straight forward".

 

[jazzcat22]

"Straight forward"?

"WINNING MATTERS...and the eye test tells us that when we need Dak the most he does not play WINNING FOOTBALL."


He said "Dak does not play winninig football".

Is that true or not?

Anything else is an assumption on the reader's part. For example, blaming ONLY Dak for the losses was never said. If you think it's implied, that's YOUR "intepretation".

"straight forward".

No assumptions. It was STRAIGHT FORWARD.

Why not THE TEAM does not play WINNING FOOTBALL? We all know why. Look at past posts history.

Seems you want to put your thoughts in on it, and side with him. So be it. I can care less.
Anti Dak fans stick together.

And no I am not defending Dak, nor am a fan, but I do not "dislike' either.
I am waiting for his replacement in a few years. Too bad it will take 2 or 3 years. I want a blue chip type QB. Like Troy was coming out of college.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

No assumptions. It was STRAIGHT FORWARD.

Why not THE TEAM does not play WINNING FOOTBALL? We all know why. Look at past posts history.

Seems you want to put your thoughts in on it, and side with him. So be it. I can care less.
Anti Dak fans stick together.

And no I am not defending Dak, nor am a fan, but I do not "dislike' either.
I am waiting for his replacement in a few years. Too bad it will take 2 or 3 years. I want a blue chip type QB. Like Troy was coming out of college.

Am not an "anti dak" fan.

What I AM a fan of is being direct and honest in conversations. You are interpreting something that was NEVER said. You even USE the word "interpret". Can;t just take the coment at face value...a comment that was TRUE.

We weren't TALKING about the team. We're talking about DAK. So you want everyone to go through every other problem FIRST...in a DAK THREAD.

I thought we were supposed to stay on topic.

 

[jazzcat22]

Am not an "anti dak" fan.

What I AM a fan of is being direct and honest in conversations. You are interpreting something that was NEVER said. You even USE the word "interpret". Can;t just take the coment at face value...a comment that was TRUE.

We weren't TALKING about the team. We're talking about DAK. So you want everyone to go through every other problem FIRST...in a DAK THREAD.

I thought we were supposed to stay on topic.

Do you not think you are the one interpreting it that was not said in the same way?
IT WAS VERY CLEAR ON THE INTENT.

So a Dak thread can't include anything about the team being involved? So blame Dak posts are the only ones allowed?

How many no Dak threads get take over by Dak comments? 98% probably.

Dak is part of the TEAM last I new. Do you have inside knowledge he is not part of the team?

I stand by what I say. Which is the truth, and you don't like it.

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

Do you not think you are the one interpreting it that was not said in the same way?
IT WAS VERY CLEAR ON THE INTENT.

So a Dak thread can't include anything about the team being involved? So blame Dak posts are the only ones allowed?

How many no Dak threads get take over by Dak comments? 98% probably.

Dak is part of the TEAM last I new. Do you have inside knowledge he is not part of the team?

I stand by what I say. Which is the truth, and you don't like it.

He IS part of the team...a team that does fail. Therefore being part of the team that fails, Dak fails.

Along with the centers, lbers,etc ...but this *is* a dak thread.
You must have missed all the threads about bad Defense, and Bad Jerry, terrible yes men coaches? We can test your theory about "only blame Dak"...by making yet another one.
We can make one about the center's regular season and post season records...if you wanna.

No I do not have your site data on how exactly many"no Dak threads" get taken over Dak comments. 98%? If you say so.


You have to face facts that it is not very realistic (countrer producive actaully) for every commenter to run down EVERY SINGLE OTHER problem FIRST...every time...before getting to Dak.

Also not very realistic AND counterproductive to "interpret" just because someone mentions dak...in a Dak thread....only blames just dak.


We seem to be at impasse. You think it's okay to "interpret" (your word not mine) comments instead of face value. I think that way leads to madness.

I think if you think one is implying something unsaid...a request for clarification is more respectful.

 

[CT Dal Fan]

Randy Gregory thought he did.

The 1990s Cowboys did. Won three Super Bowls despite widespread use of performance decreasing substances.

 

[jazzcat22]

He IS part of the team...a team that does fail. Therefore being part of the team that fails, Dak fails.

Along with the centers, lbers,etc ...but this *is* a dak thread.
You must have missed all the threads about bad Defense, and Bad Jerry, terrible yes men coaches? We can test your theory about "only blame Dak"...by making yet another one.
We can make one about the center's regular season and post season records...if you wanna.

No I do not have your site data on how exactly many"no Dak threads" get taken over Dak comments. 98%? If you say so.


You have to face facts that it is not very realistic (countrer producive actaully) for every commenter to run down EVERY SINGLE OTHER problem FIRST...every time...before getting to Dak.

Also not very realistic AND counterproductive to "interpret" just because someone mentions dak...in a Dak thread....only blames just dak.


We seem to be at impasse. You think it's okay to "interpret" (your word not mine) comments instead of face value. I think that way leads to madness.

I think if you think one is implying something unsaid...a request for clarification is more respectful.

It was very well clarified IMO.
Again look at posting history about his constant disdain for Dak.

 

[amame25]

Nobody said it was.

The same people that scream "It's a team game" also celebrate Daks All-Pros.

All pro awards are an individual award. Individual games are a team thing.

 

[amame25]

If only stans didn't want to rely on garbage time stats to justify individual awards and bloated contracts.

I see a lot of people bloviate about garbage time stats but never supply anything to back that up.

 

[amame25]

You must need attention. The distinction with a difference was outlined in my post. If you missed it, maybe this is not the thread for you.

I'm sorry which one of your 6000 posts on the same subject was I supposed to be sorting through? Talk about needing attention.

 

[5Stars]

They also blame all the losses on Dak, but never give him credit for a win.

lol, my man Jazz, stirring up that trouble.