Cowboys O scoring at a historic pace

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Will we ever have a great defense to pair with this O?

Or a good defense?

Or an adequate defense?

well, we are scoring at historic pace despite Dak, which speaks volumes for everyone on offense and how good they are.

 

[Nav22]

well, we are scoring at historic pace despite Dak, which speaks volumes for everyone on offense and how good they are.

Hahah right. Dak Dilfer!

 

[McKDaddy]

Am I missing something? I'm questioning myself because, surely, no one would double down this way on something that seems so obviously incorrect. The comparison goes back to 2000. That so many high ranking teams are from relatively recent seasons doesn't undermine it's value (although I wouldn't argue it as much beyond just being interesting).

so you consider all 6 of the examples as historic?

what if the graph had listed the top 10?

the point is if you consider only what this graph represents, then the only "historic" number is the first one.

from a big picture perspective the Patriots 2007 season is the historic season for points per drive. "During their peak 4-game stretches in 2007 (such as their opening run scoring blowout totals against the Jets, Chargers, Bills, and Browns), the Patriots pushed their rolling points-per-drive average even higher past 3.8 to 4.0+ points per drive during specific compressed windows". That offense achieved cultural relevance & rewrote many other NFL records that season.

 

[Kevinicus]

This is impossible lol.

Indeed it is not.

 

[Kevinicus]

Am I missing something? I'm questioning myself because, surely, no one would double down this way on something that seems so obviously incorrect. The comparison goes back to 2000. That so many high ranking teams are from relatively recent seasons doesn't undermine it's value (although I wouldn't argue it as much beyond just being interesting).

You know it's possible to take a subset of data to help illustrate a point right?

Even at fifth over 27 years, calling it historic is ridiculous. Digging deeper and seeing it's 4th in just the last 7 reinforces that point even more. As does the fact that this whole thing is just the first 4 games of the season which is pretty irrelevant to anything.

 

[Kevinicus]

Someone tell Buzz Aldrin his moon walk wasn't historic.

He wasn't there first!!!

SMH. Embarrassing.

For the sake of argument, let's put aside the subjectivity/objectivity aspect for a moment.

What are your arguments for this particular specialize stat, and the Cowboys being 5th in the timeframe given, being historic? TO YOU, what makes it historic?

 

[LouBrown]

Not what I did turd.

I actually rewatched the games.

Everything is accurate and I did not once say garbage time ....... that was you.

March 4 2026

You're lying.

The Cowboys never trailed the Packers by 41 points. They never trailed the 9ers by more than 16. Just completely made up. Either you're stupid because you can't add or you're stupid because you trusted Gemini or ChatGPT. Doesn't matter to me.

 

[zrinkill]

your stupid

What a triggered fella

 

[LouBrown]

Indeed it is not.

Are you kidding me? You have to be trolling.

You can't objectively say something is good, bad, great, awesome, important, cool, or historic. You can say that "objectively this has only happened one time and therefore I *think* it is historic" or "This is a small sample and therefore I *think* it is not historic."

Just admit that you don't know what the words mean.

 

[LouBrown]

What a triggered fella

Proper use of the word in that context, but good try. This is exactly someone would do when they know they're busted.

You're stupid, yes.

 

[McKDaddy]

Someone tell Buzz Aldrin his moon walk wasn't historic.

He wasn't there first!!!

He was there at the same time though.

Pete Conrad & Alan Bean, just 4 months later, not so much.

 

[zrinkill]

Proper use of the word in that context, but good try. This is exactly someone would do when they know they're busted.

You're stupid, yes.

I am not busted on anything ........ everything I said was accurate .......... You are just a silly ex poster with a vendetta ...... and you are looking like a triggered child ...... as usual.

 

[zrinkill]

Indeed it is not.

They are trying to get the thread locked ....... its why they are calling people stupid.

Its what happens when they start losing the argument.

 

[LouBrown]

I am not busted on anything ........ everything I said was accurate .......... You are just a silly ex poster with a vendetta ...... and you are looking like a triggered child ...... as usual.

No, you are wrong. The Cowboys never trailed the Packers by 41. The Cowboys never trailed the 9ers by 3 scores. Simple, black and white.

You used AI to try to make your point for you, and it's obvious.

I have no vendetta lol, you're not that important.

 

[zrinkill]

I have no vendetta

Sure son ...... sure