if anyone ends up with a youtube link of this convo...i need it![]()
And when is it within the nfl rules that a wr can grab ahold of a defenders facemask and it not be flagged? Dez coming onto the field without a helmet should have been a penalty.
And when is it within the nfl rules that a wr can grab ahold of a defenders facemask and it not be flagged? Dez coming onto the field without a helmet should have been a penalty.
The facemask is irrelevant to whether it was PI or not. You guys are using that to distract from the actual call on the field.
You cannot grab someone's jersey to impede their progress. You cannot make clear substantial contact with the receiver before the ball arrives with your back to the football.
Hitchens did both. It was a penalty.
The facemask is irrelevant to whether it was PI or not. You guys are using that to distract from the actual call on the field.
You cannot grab someone's jersey to impede their progress. You cannot make clear substantial contact with the receiver before the ball arrives with your back to the football.
Hitchens did both. It was a penalty.
Wow - can't believe what I'm hearing... He's saying:
. It wasn't pass interference
. Face guarding is not a penalty in the NFL like in college ball
. If anything, Pettigrew grabbed Hitchen's facemask
. Pettigrew didn't come back to the ball and could have changed the call if he had - forcing Hitchen's to move into him
. Hitchen's has a right to his space, it was man coverage
. Hitchen's didn't 'gain an advantage' by putting his left hand on Hitchen's
. The trajectory of the ball was flat and if it had been better thrown, then Hitchen's left hand would have impeded Pettigrew
He actually talked Greenie and Golic OUT OF IT!!!
And when is it within the nfl rules that a wr can grab ahold of a defenders facemask and it not be flagged? Dez coming onto the field without a helmet should have been a penalty.
The reversal was correct.
It was a very clumsy way of handling it which led to the whining.
the no helmet has already been rebuked. I do find it funny that when people hear it on tv, or read it elsewhere on the net, it must be true. no need to actually validate facts before shouting them out again.
Sorry. That was PI. Twice. First the jersey grab and then the contact with the shoulder.
We got away with one. I refuse to pretend otherwise.
I thought the issue was him coming on the field
The facemask is irrelevant to whether it was PI or not. You guys are using that to distract from the actual call on the field.
You cannot grab someone's jersey to impede their progress. You cannot make clear substantial contact with the receiver before the ball arrives with your back to the football.
Hitchens did both. It was a penalty.
I thought the issue was him coming on the field
BestMost committed troll of all-time?
Yes. It was.
No doubt.
Grabbing the facemask and pulling the defender by it is also a penalty.
But I guess it only matters to you that one guy committed a penalty.