News: DMN: Michael Irvin: Sorry Jerry Rice, but I didn’t need stickum when I played

NewsBot · Feb 12, 2015

*** Message was removed by demand from DMN ***

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

Meh, Irvin did other bad things while he played, so I'm team ignore the false self-righteousness from his side of the wing. lol

BAZ · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
Meh, Irvin did other bad things while he played, so I'm team ignore the false self-righteousness from his side of the wing. lol

What on the field things would you consider questionable?

adamknite · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
Meh, Irvin did other bad things while he played, so I'm team ignore the false self-righteousness from his side of the wing. lol

Pffft...

You should realize by now that using stickum to cheat in the game of football is for more dastardly than stabbing a man with a pair of scissors, please.

Silver N Blue · Feb 12, 2015

The man that brought physicality to the WR position didn't need a gimic!! Got to love Irv!

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

BAZ said:
What on the field things would you consider questionable?

Irvin's team history is well-documented and I don't care to parse and splice it for on-field vs off-field. It is what it is.

Nightman · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
Irvin's team history is well-documented and I don't care to parse and splice it for on-field vs off-field. It is what it is.

Off the field is big difference than being accused of cheating....He has a right to be mad

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

bkight13 said:
Off the field is big difference than being accused of cheating....He has a right to be mad

If your off-the field antics impact your on-field performance, that can be just as egregious..

I like Mike. I really do. I just can't get up for his self-righteousness over something like this when every time he speaks, I can see the many skeletons still chilling in his closet.

mldardy · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
Irvin's team history is well-documented and I don't care to parse and splice it for on-field vs off-field. It is what it is.

His team history is that he worked his butt off all the way to the Hall Of Fame and was a team leader. On the field he didn't do anything bad. Let's keep it to that. He didn't cheat on the field which is the point of what he is talking about.

Nightman · Feb 12, 2015

mldardy said:
On the field he didn't do anything bad. Let's keep it to that. He didn't cheat on the field.

I agree. You can shot for calling a man a cheater. At least back in the day.

popp1234 · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
If your off-the field antics impact your on-field performance, that can be just as egregious..

I like Mike. I really do. I just can't get up for his self-righteousness over something like this when every time he speaks, I can see the many skeletons still chilling in his closet.

What off-the field antics gave him a competitive advantage on the field? If anything, from what I have read, it should have presented more of a disadvantage.

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

popp1234 said:
What off-the field antics gave him a competitive advantage on the field?

I don't think what I'm saying is really that complicated.

Toruk_Makto · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
If your off-the field antics impact your on-field performance, that can be just as egregious..

I like Mike. I really do. I just can't get up for his self-righteousness over something like this when every time he speaks, I can see the many skeletons still chilling in his closet.

Cheating and not cheating are vastly different than being a distraction off the field.

Not even close.

popp1234 · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
I don't think what I'm saying is really that complicated.

Well, perhaps you can break it down to my level. Because, in all honesty, I have not read or heard anything he did that would be construed as giving him an illegal competitive advantage.

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

Toruk_Makto said:
Cheating and not cheating are vastly different than being a distraction off the field.

Not even close.

It's all relative to me..

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

popp1234 said:
Well, perhaps you can break it down to my level. Because, in all honesty, I have not read or heard anything he did that would be construed as giving him a competitive advantage.

Nah, I'll pass..

mldardy · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
Nah, I'll pass..

You probably should because you've painted yourself in a corner IMO.

Nightman · Feb 12, 2015

WoodysGirl said:
I don't think what I'm saying is really that complicated.

I understand. It's the same reason people knock Ray Lewis for all his bloviations after the trouble he got into.

To me, Mike can be annoying on TV as well, but being accused of cheating is worth getting mad about.

WoodysGirl · Feb 12, 2015

mldardy said:
You probably should because you've painted yourself in a corner IMO.

Not really.. I've said my opinion and I don't think it's that difficult to understand. People want to parse up on-field behavior vs off-field behavior. If you've done dirt to muddy up your character, then I'm going to side-eye you every time. Same as I'm side-eyeing Jerry Rice.

mldardy · Feb 12, 2015

bkight13 said:
I understand. It's the same reason people knock Ray Lewis for all his bloviations after the trouble he got into.

To me, Mike can be annoying on TV as well, but being accused of cheating is worth getting mad about.

You're equating Ray Lewis and what he did to Irvin. Are you serious?

News: DMN: Michael Irvin: Sorry Jerry Rice, but I didn’t need stickum when I played

New Member

U.N.I.T.Y

Drunken Mick

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

U.N.I.T.Y

Capologist

U.N.I.T.Y

Well-Known Member

Capologist

Well-Known Member

U.N.I.T.Y

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

U.N.I.T.Y

U.N.I.T.Y

Well-Known Member

Capologist

U.N.I.T.Y

Well-Known Member

Forum statistics