EST_1986
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,211
- Reaction score
- 14,713
We have beat this subject like a rented mule.
We beat it so hard it injured Lee
We have beat this subject like a rented mule.
Yeah. I can't see where the disappointment is coming from.
If not Murray for dirt cheap then who?
I honestly like this move a lot.
Do you think they passed on all the other RBs because they knew they had McFadden in the bag? It seems that this deal was done for awhile, given all the provisions. I think it may have affected the negotiations with Murray. I think they were pretty glad Murray left.
Hey guys, the best thing about this signing us that ....
OK, I got nothing
But dont worry @TheRomoSexual will be here any minute now with his usual drivel telling us how great a signing this is
To be fair, you have "nothing" because you rarely have anything of substance to add to this board.
To be fair, I wouldn't even know he said anything if you didn't acknowledge him. I have to think most of us have him on ignore already.
I wouldn't be surprised if McFadden isn't even on the opening day roster. As it is, it's a risk-free move that hedges our bets moving forward. I don't see this move as a hindrance in us making a second move at the position should someone become available or if the right player is available to us in the draft.
I thought that originally but if the scouts are seeing what Broaddus is, they blame the raiders OL. He has the best skills to be the 3rd down back that could block for Romo and catch passes.
WE ARE DRAFTING AN RB PEOPLE!
Our coaching staff is not stupid, they are not thinking McFadden is our starter and can last 16 games with the workload. There are plenty of RBs in this draft we can grab. Want to know why Murray didn't get a big offer? It wasn't just because of the cap, it's also because we have our eyes on a couple RBs in the draft. Read a couple threads from the past week, me and a few others already predicted McFadden would be brought in as a backup to whatever RB we draft.
And that is absolutely idiotic to say Jones will get too comfortable and not bring in top level talent any longer. And that's also idiotic to stop bringing in risk/reward players too. We'll bring in top level talent on reasonable deals, we just won't overspend. And yes, that is possible.
We are not going through 7 rounds of the draft without grabbing one of the top RBs. If I'm wrong, I'll come right back to this thread and eat my crow. But as of now, it's almost a certainty that's what we'll do. Coleman will most likely be our guy, so have some fun and watch his highlights and familiarize yourself with him.
Maybe you have not been keeping up with current events bro, but let me breakdown our current backfield for you............
Ryan Williams......was on practice squad all year
Lance Dunbar......gets maybe 1-2 touches per game
Joseph Randle......keeps stealing underwear from Dillards
Darren McFadden........has been hurt every year in the league, has broken 1000 yards just once in 7 years.
That's it bro, nothing else.............maybe we draft a rookie RB and maybe we don't, that is all hypothetical............this is what we actually have today. So who on this list is replacing Murray?
Or is the plan to let this JV level backfield run as a committee with carries split among the 4 runners?
Aww cmon everyone...
Anyone can run behind our all pro line right...
Yeah were probably drafting in the 1st round. Would rather go defense since almost our entire linebacker crew has left town.
Jone's are getting comfortable. They now think that good coaching will coverup for the lack of talent. I guess thats what happens when we finally have a dependable coach in Marinelli. They probably aren't even worried about getting a passrusher. Thats really too bad because were a passrusher away from becoming a top team.
Say what you want. The Jones's need to get talent on defense first and foremost. Now that Murray is gone were gonna be putting our eggs into filling that basket with a runningback with our top pick.
I'm Johnny come-lately but I'm going to add some comparisons (I'm not going to scan 50 pages of threads to see if these have been mentioned)
1. Though McFadden has been in the league twice as long...Darren only has 70 more carries...and far, far fewer miles on the odometer in the past 2 years.
2. Though McFadden has been in the league twice as long...both guys 27 years old.
3. They share virtually identical size
4. McFadden was much more celebrated back coming into draft
5. McFadden has one of fastest 40 times you'll see. Has he lost a step?
6. DeMarco played behind poor offensive lines—certainly in 2011 and 2012. Yet he always averaged 4.1 or better per carry. McFadden has had two nice years, but four seasons with averages under 3.4. DeMarco has played with a good quarterback, stretching the field. McFadden never has.
7. Until 2014 DeMarco played on a mediocre team. McFadden has had the misfortune of being stuck on the worst team of the past decade.
I don't get how you can't be OK with this? this is virtually a risk-free deal...if the guy is on the field and can play, they he earns his meal money, and not much in he gran scheme of things...if not, then the cap isn't "hit" with anything...this guy used to be pretty darned good....let's give it a few months to see if he can earn his spot...
...the people poo-pooing this astound me...no risk here, and I don't feel for a second it impacted the murray decision in the least