A gift to the Falcons

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I found this article entertaining. Red flag throwing, clapping, and timeouts, Its really all Garrett has to do for this team and he still cant do his job correctly. Sadly enough.

http://www.***BANNED-URL***/sports/...ons-triggers-unstoppable-atlanta-comeback.ece
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,663
Reaction score
32,039
We lose one game when most of our playmakers are out, and now Garrett can't coach, T. Williams should be cut and Weeden should have a clipboard permanently attached to his hands.
Our overreaction is reaching epic proportions. Makes me feel like I'm on the Eagles fan board and living in Philadelphia after last week's lost to the Cowboys. :facepalm:
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
97,625
Reaction score
100,432
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I read that last night in the NewsfeedZone.

What happened in the Atlanta lockerroom at half time was a far bigger trigger IMO.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,176
Reaction score
7,682
That timeout made no difference. Atlanta was not about to let us run all the time off the clock and they kicked a FG with 40 seconds. The pivotal moment was the Devonte Freeman catch and rune before the half.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I read that last night in the NewsfeedZone.

What happened in the Atlanta lockerroom at half time was a far bigger trigger IMO.

I recall getting something to drink and coming back and wondering how the Falcons got the ball with so much time left on the clock. I guess that was the answer. Howdy Doody blew the game day management again. LOL Its so sad how this guy just blows any and all opportunities he gets to affect the game day management. Take 95% of the responsibility away from him and he will blow the 5% he still has. Unreal.

Calls a timeout when he could have ran the clock down? Jerry please strip of the timeouts also..............Will we have to wait another 8 years for this rookie to learn how to manage the clock and timeouts? Pathetic.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
That timeout made no difference. Atlanta was not about to let us run all the time off the clock and they kicked a FG with 40 seconds. The pivotal moment was the Devonte Freeman catch and rune before the half.

At the very least, you make them burn a timeout. Its was dumb. No way to sugar coat it.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,663
Reaction score
32,039
Oh, and the three points before halftime was immaterial, IMO. Had we run the clock down, the Falcons still would have beaten us 36-28.
I don't see how the three changed the Falcons strategy. They would have done the same thing had the score been 28-14.
We just got beat in the second half.
Furthermore, I think the Weeden interception was a killer because had we move down the field and scored a touchdown - a high probability based on past drives - we would have been up by 21 points. (We were up 21-7 at that time.) We gave the Falcons a short field; they scored and we're only leading by seven.
However, if Weeden doesn't throw the interception, and we stop the Falcons and score before the half, we could have been up 35-7 or 35-10.
I don't expect Weeden to be Romo. But you can't throw that interception. There was no reason to throw that pass. And that became a HUGE momentum changer.

But it's over with. We don't get to go back in the past and change anything. We're 2-1, and I still like our changes against the Saints.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,176
Reaction score
7,682
At the very least, you make them burn a timeout. Its was dumb. No way to sugar coat it.

Play clock is what 40 seconds? It obviously made no difference, they were well into FG range before that and likely just take 1 less shot in the end zone. As far as the timeout goes, for all you know, that could have been the difference between a TD and FG. You have no idea the context, nd considering it made ZERO difference, blowing it out of proportion is just silly.
 

DeaconMoss

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
6,860
I thought this thread was going to be about running Julio Jones across the backfield formation and nobody covering him on the 5 yard line.
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,034
Reaction score
6,463
We lose one game when most of our playmakers are out, and now Garrett can't coach, T. Williams should be cut and Weeden should have a clipboard permanently attached to his hands.
Our overreaction is reaching epic proportions. Makes me feel like I'm on the Eagles fan board and living in Philadelphia after last week's lost to the Cowboys. :facepalm:

Ha ha, you are right. I always wait 24 hours to cool down before I post.
 

Clarkson

Wonderboyromo
Messages
2,677
Reaction score
1,599
We aren't going to win every game. We lost to a good team with 5 of our 10 best players not playing. A game we could've won. This is not Garrett's fault, or even Weeden's fault. The whole team laid down in the 2nd half, but partially because Atlanta had a good game plan.
 

mldardy

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,482
Reaction score
7,161
Oh, and the three points before halftime was immaterial, IMO. Had we run the clock down, the Falcons still would have beaten us 36-28.
I don't see how the three changed the Falcons strategy. They would have done the same thing had the score been 28-14.
We just got beat in the second half.
Furthermore, I think the Weeden interception was a killer because had we move down the field and scored a touchdown - a high probability based on past drives - we would have been up by 21 points. (We were up 21-7 at that time.) We gave the Falcons a short field; they scored and we're only leading by seven.
However, if Weeden doesn't throw the interception, and we stop the Falcons and score before the half, we could have been up 35-7 or 35-10.
I don't expect Weeden to be Romo. But you can't throw that interception. There was no reason to throw that pass. And that became a HUGE momentum changer.

But it's over with. We don't get to go back in the past and change anything. We're 2-1, and I still like our changes against the Saints.

Agreed. If Garrett doesn't call the timeout and we either failed to score or turn it over or something people are upset as well. The problem is THE DEFENSE didn't do it's job. Garrett did his job by making sure we got the TOUCHDOWN and not just a FG. I can't believe people are *****ing about this. So many things to ***** about in this game and using a timeout for 3 freaking points when the defense let the Falcons skirt down the field with such ease isn't one of them.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Play clock is what 40 seconds? It obviously made no difference, they were well into FG range before that and likely just take 1 less shot in the end zone. As far as the timeout goes, for all you know, that could have been the difference between a TD and FG. You have no idea the context, nd considering it made ZERO difference, blowing it out of proportion is just silly.

LOL.......it obviously made a big difference because many people are hammering Garrett for it today. Here is another one for you. And these are all Cowboys websites. Its not my fault that you dont get it. Its really a simple concept. Unfortunately for us, our head coach doesnt get it either. Or at least he didnt get it during the game. But guess what? He admitted he screwed up. But hey, didnt make a difference right?

  1. Garrett’s timeout before half –While the mindset was to make sure the Cowboys got in the end zone, clock management ended up costing them three points. With the Cowboys leading 21-14 in the final minute of the first half, Lance Dunbar caught a 22-yard pass to the Falcons’ 1-yard line and Garrett decided to call a timeout with 46 seconds left. Obviously, the plan was to get the right personnel on the field to score, and that’s what happened as Randle went over the top for his third touchdown. However, it left 40 seconds on the clock, and the Falcons, with three timeouts, marched down to get a field goal as time expired. With 46 seconds and two timeouts for Dallas, calling one right then doesn’t seem that necessary. If anything, they could’ve let about 15-20 ticks run off and then call the timeout to make sure they had enough time to run three or four plays themselves, but nothing left over for the Falcons. Three points was huge because the Cowboys lost by 11, but it could’ve been only eight on the final drive.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
We lose one game when most of our playmakers are out, and now Garrett can't coach, T. Williams should be cut and Weeden should have a clipboard permanently attached to his hands.
Our overreaction is reaching epic proportions. Makes me feel like I'm on the Eagles fan board and living in Philadelphia after last week's lost to the Cowboys. :facepalm:

True but then over reaction is nothing new here. In past people have wanted Romo cut as well. Dallas right now needs to regroup look at the positives and negatives of this game and improve on them. I will not call it a gift to Alt they were more physical than Dallas and their run game really hurt the Cowboys
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,876
Reaction score
58,456
Oh, good gosh.

Dallas was outscored, 25-0, to end that game because the Cowboys had zero pass rush, nobody that could cover Julio Jones, nobody that could stop Freeman from running wild when the defense got tired, and Brandon Weeden at quarterback who couldn't or wouldn't throw a ball more than 10 yards downfield. When Jack Crawford is the starting DE, and his backup is a late-round pick in his first NFL game, you're kinda in trouble.

Clock management was completely irrelevant yesterday.
 

PAINFROMUKRAINE

Well-Known Member
Messages
350
Reaction score
317
Garrett must still be in "training" so all if well because he will master time management very soon.Garrett got a BIG extension in the Off Season so there are no excuses. Romo is not there to save his butt. Other "Great" HCs win games without their starting QBs and other key players present due to injuries. Furthermore, Garrett and second half adjustments just do not seem to work. I do not know if he realizes that sometimes your game plans need to change during football games. Princeton Smart - Football Stupid.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,663
Reaction score
32,039
Oh, good gosh.

Dallas was outscored, 25-0, to end that game because the Cowboys had zero pass rush, nobody that could cover Julio Jones, nobody that could stop Freeman from running wild when the defense got tired, and Brandon Weeden at quarterback who couldn't or wouldn't throw a ball more than 10 yards downfield. When Jack Crawford is the starting DE, and his backup is a late-round pick in his first NFL game, you're kinda in trouble.

Clock management was completely irrelevant yesterday.

I guess it makes people feel better about their arm-chair clock management skills that we could have lost by 8 instead of 11. :rolleyes:
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
We aren't going to win every game. We lost to a good team with 5 of our 10 best players not playing. A game we could've won. This is not Garrett's fault, or even Weeden's fault. The whole team laid down in the 2nd half, but partially because Atlanta had a good game plan.

I will lay this one on the defense, but like you said, it was a team loss. Usually is. But this is just another prime example of BAD at game day management. He cant handle it, end of story. Makes BAD decisions. And when your team has injuries and in close games, these little things matter. Like back when we were 8-8 three years in a row. We lost several close games because Garrett blew the game day management. Unfortunately you cant really strip the head coach of timeout calls. Sadly enough.
 

LucaBrasi

Sleeps with the fishes
Messages
5,589
Reaction score
7,495
Dumb timeout, without a doubt. Said it yesterday and was called out in the 1st Half game thread. wasn't the reason for the loss, but it was still terrible clock management. Everything needed to be better yesterday, including the coaching.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Garrett must still be in "training" so all if well because he will master time management very soon.Garrett got a BIG extension in the Off Season so there are no excuses. Romo is not there to save his butt. Other "Great" HCs win games without their starting QBs and other key players present due to injuries. Furthermore, Garrett and second half adjustments just do not seem to work. I do not know if he realizes that sometimes your game plans need to change during football games. Princeton Smart - Football Stupid.

LOL....Princeton smart football stupid? Love that one.

Garrett is truly one of the worst football guys I have ever seen. Probably would have been better running for President or some political office.
 
Top