News: BTB: Three Reasons The Dallas Cowboys Should Pass On A Quarterback In The First Round

NewsBot

New Member
Messages
111,281
Reaction score
2,947
GettyImages-1486551.0.jpg

The Cowboys have a great opportunity to get one of the best players in college with pick number four. But is taking a quarterback the right choice?

The Cowboys will have a tough decision in April's draft as they use the number four overall pick to take one of the best players in college. After watching the offense fall on its face in 2015, a lot of fans want to see the Cowboys select one of the premier quarterbacks in the draft. Whether your favorite is Paxton Lynch from Memphis, Jared Goff from California, or Carson Wentz from North Dakota State, these guys are the talk of the town when it comes to elite QBs in the draft. Recently, my colleague, Tom Ryle expressed how the Cowboys shouldn't pass up such a great opportunity to go after Tony Romo’s eventual replacement. But is that really the right play here? Here are three reasons why going after a quarterback with pick number four could be a mistake.

Reason #1 – Finding a franchise QB is hard


Of course it is, or else everyone would have one. Many teams have tried and many teams have come up empty. For a lot of teams, finding their quarterback has been a trial and error process that often times results in a player that is not regarded as one of the top players coming out of college.

Since the Cowboys may have a shot at the elite college QBs with their first pick in the draft, I wanted to take a look at the top two QBs selected in the draft over the last decade. To allow enough time to properly gauge their NFL contributions, the last three drafts will not be included. Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota may turn out to be great, or they may not. It’s too early to label them so I won’t.

image_12.0.png


Out of the 14 quarterbacks on this list…

  • only six are currently starting in this league
  • two are backups (Mark Sanchez and Robert Griffin III)
  • six are out of the league, with five of them starting 25 or fewer games in their career

History would indicate that the Cowboys chances of getting a starter-caliber quarterback with their first pick is less than a coin flip. That’s risky business. But you have to take chances sometimes and if you know what you’re doing, then your chances of success improves. And that brings me to the next item – do the Cowboys know what they’re doing?

Reason #2 – The Cowboys aren’t good at evaluating quarterbacks


If there is one thing that has puzzled me about having Jason Garrett for a coach, it is the Cowboys inability to have a quality backup. Garrett, who flew through the coaching ranks from being this really smart quarterbacks coach, has struggled finding someone other than Tony Romo to play well. Kyle Orton, Brandon Weeden, and Matt Cassel have all come up short when their number was called.

Maybe it’s a talent-evaluation thing. Or maybe they are not being coached up well. It’s all speculation as to what the problem is. What is known though is that Garrett, Scott Linehan, Wade Wilson, and the Cowboys scouting resources have not been successful in acquiring a viable backup for Romo. If they’ve misjudged their QB situation so badly in recent years, how confident are you that they’d be able to make a good selection with that number four pick? Rolling the dice and having it come up "Ryan Leaf" would be a big setback for this organization.

Reason #3 – The Cowboys are great at evaluating defensive players


During the period leading up to last year’s draft, I was initially apprehensive about the Cowboys selecting a cornerback with their first-round pick. There were two big reasons for this – Morris Claiborne and Brandon Carr. The team whiffed in 2012 in the cornerback department.

But that was before Rod Marinelli showed up. In his three seasons with the Cowboys, Marinelli has proven he can do well with whatever resources you give him. He was given very little to work with in 2013, but still found guys who could help the team – Justin Durant and George Selvie. In 2014, the team invested some draft resources in defense and he got players like DeMarcus Lawrence and Anthony Hitchens. And last year’s selection of Byron Jones appears to put to rest any thought that they can’t properly assess the cornerback position.

So, if Marinelli can do well with an early second-round pick a couple years ago and a late first-round pick last year, what can he do with a top pick in the 2016 draft? There are some really enticing names that could be sitting there when the Cowboys are on the clock.

DE, Joey Bosa, Ohio State

OLB, Myles Jack, UCLA

CB, Jalen Ramsey, Florida State

Passing up a player like this could be rather difficult. Give Marinelli some dancing chips and see what he can do.

What direction would you go with the Cowboys first round draft pick?

Continue reading...
 

egn22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,855
Reaction score
2,015
I'm with the article. Grab a really nice defensive player like Myles Jack or Ashawn Robinson and then coin flip your QB somewhere else in the draft.
Sign RGIII or Manziel and let them compete with the rookie QB to increase your odds of finding Romos future replacement.
In the meantime you're already very solid defense just moved up another notch and could potentially be elite.
 

DogFace

Carharris2
Messages
13,170
Reaction score
15,651
I think the article brings up an important fact. Qb's are harder to draft than other positions. Do we never do it? No. Just maybe not this early in the draft when we are close and another position may be more valuable right now.

Seems like a reasonable thing to think about.
 

lkelly

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,850
Reaction score
6,181
So if it's a 50/50 proposition to find a starting QB at the top of the draft, what is it if you don't draft one? 3% chance to luck into a Romo (to paraphrase Jerry the GM)?

I wonder if the author is married. If half all marriages end in divorce, don't even think about dating. Of course to participate in the NFL you can't be single unless you want to just run the wildcat.
 

lkelly

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,850
Reaction score
6,181
I think the article brings up an important fact. Qb's are harder to draft than other positions. Do we never do it? No. Just maybe not this early in the draft when we are close and another position may be more valuable right now.

Seems like a reasonable thing to think about.

Define "close."

I see a team with the worst record in the NFC. Only 15 teams stand in their way!
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,471
Reaction score
67,278
Just maybe not this early in the draft when we are close

We are close? A team coming off a conference worst record is "close"? We might be the first 4-12 team to ever characterize themselves that way.

and another position may be more valuable right now.

If we were discussing most any other position other than QB, perhaps.

But the simplest facts are right there, plain as day. You want a better chance at a quality QB you need to take them at the top of the draft.

We are rarely there, but now we are, we say it is too hard?

That just makes no sense whatsoever. All that logic is someone talking themselves out of the risk involved and pretending there is some sort of basis for being, well, frightened because somebody else has failed before.
 

TheBigEasy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,477
Reaction score
1,976
So, if I'm understanding this article correctly, he's saying we should go offense and our pick should be Treadwell. I like it. :flagwave:
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
That is one stupid write up. 1 it is hard to find? yes it is hard to find and you have better chances by drafting the guys with the most talent and guess what they tend to be at the top of the draft.
2. Cowboys are not good at evaluating QB? So then we don't look for a QB, just sit there with a finger up the backside and just hope one falls out of the sky and lastly 3 Dallas is good at evaluating defensive players? debatable but does not to solve the QB situation.
 
Top