Rumor: Rodgers: Cowboys have standing trade offer for QB Mike Glennon

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,491
Reaction score
4,932
it would be hard for me to give a 3rd rounder, no way for two of them.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
We're obviously not offering two 3rds for a guy who's on the last year of a contract in the first place, after we spent the offseason *not* offering the QB2 job to other comparable QBs who were on the market and would have cost us nothing.

I'd be all over Glennon as a FA, though.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
They see Glrnnon as s much better prospect and an upgrade. They took Dak because Glennon may never be available, so Dak is just an insurance policy. The team tried to obtain several QBs and it looks like Dak was way down the list of options.

False. There wasn't a single player in the draft or FA that Dallas met with or worked out more than Dak Prescott. Not one. Dak was part of the plan all along as long as he fell to the 4th.
 

Section446

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,886
Reaction score
11,526
This would make me feel so much better going into the season, he's better than anything we've had behind Romo the whole time Romo has been the starter.
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,491
Reaction score
4,932
False. There wasn't a single player in the draft or FA that Dallas met with or worked out more than Dak Prescott. Not one. Dak was part of the plan all along as long as he fell to the 4th.

you mean after we tried to get Lynch, and Cook. right?
 

dogunwo

Franchise Tagged
Messages
10,287
Reaction score
5,683
When has Glennon been all that good anyway? Why waste time on him? He was so awesome that the Bucs drafted another QB. If you think he is the heir apparent, which I can't see how you could, sure, the trade would be worth it. Why would we trade a third for someone who's ceiling is career backup?
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,539
Reaction score
20,254
Wouldn't mind trading a 4th or 5th to have him compete. But I don't believe this, this is the NFL section of sport sites not having much to talk about right now.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
you mean after we tried to get Lynch, and Cook. right?

If Lynch or Cook fell right we would have taken either. The fact remains that the Cowboys spent more time with Prescott than any other prospect FA or otherwise. He was solidly scouted to entertain a variety of scenarios. You don't spend that much time with a prospect unless you have a realistic scenario in which you have a chance to draft him. To think otherwise is either blatant stupidity or wilful ignorance.

With that being said, If Dallas had a chance at Lynch they would have drafted him (they tried, and rightfully so. He's a higher rated prospect). They would have taken Wentz if he was there, too @ #4. That doesn't mean that you don't scout and have a backup plan for Elliott because you have your heart set on Wentz. It's not rocket surgery.
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,491
Reaction score
4,932
If Lynch or Cook fell right we would have taken either. The fact remains that the Cowboys spent more time with Prescott than any other prospect FA or otherwise. He was solidly scouted to entertain a variety of scenarios. You don't spend that much time with a prospect unless you have a realistic scenario in which you have a chance to draft him. To think otherwise is either blatant stupidity or wilful ignorance.

With that being said, If Dallas had a chance at Lynch they would have drafted him (they tried, and rightfully so. He's a higher rated prospect). They would have taken Wentz if he was there, too @ #4. That doesn't mean that you don't scout and have a backup plan for Elliott because you have your heart set on Wentz. It's not rocket surgery.

i wasn't disputing that we spent a lot of time scouting him, but it was obvious after the attempts to trade up for others... he was further down the totem pole for us.
 

Vero_F250

Well-Known Member
Messages
774
Reaction score
1,008
So Jerry would have parted with his precious 3rd for Glennon but refused to part with it for Paxton Lynch? I call BS.
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
False. There wasn't a single player in the draft or FA that Dallas met with or worked out more than Dak Prescott. Not one. Dak was part of the plan all along as long as he fell to the 4th.

If you look at it, there was several QBs options that was considered before drafting Dak. The teams actions in attempts to get other QBs before settling on Dak. All of those meeting looked good for Dak, but the repeated attempts to get get other QBs spoke volumes as well. Jerry is still regretting not making the trade for Lynch.
 
Top