What a trade does to this team

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,030
Reaction score
20,227
Romo isn't going anywhere for a bag of chips. If we move him, it will be for premium compensation. If not he will be the starter when he returns, most likely. So having said that if he was trades this year, (probably only to Denver as that is one of the few teams it makes sense to trade for) or maybe the Jets (they won't make the super bowl this yerar with or without him, but Ryan may trade for him to fix the problem for next year) you would probably net three very late number 1's from denver or possibly two number ones from the Jets.

You would lose the security of Romo being here. Some of you are dismissive of this, but Dak's track record isn't long. You risk teams figuring him out and slowing his roll considerably, which is a substantial risk. It is easy if you say it really fast, but that doesn't change the fact it is a real factor. You are trading your starter. Let that sink in. Jerry takes a lot of risk in making that trade, so he isn't going to just give up Romo and be a laughingstock. He will get enough compensation to do the deal so that even if Prescott fails after the trade he can reasonably say, it was a trade that was worth the risk he took, and for most reasonable minds to agree with that statement.

Having said that, on the other side of the balance sheet it would mean cheap QB play for a couple of years. Not forever. I think Dak is on only a 3 year deak. We will get one more cheap year out of him and then he will cost as much or more than Romo does now. The cap savings matter, but not as much as the draft picks would.

With the three late round #1's you could probably get a late round defensive end to bolster the defense, or a replacement for Mo, if we don't want to pay Mo, which would save a ton of money, a linebacker to add to Lee and hopefully Jaylon. Or you could pay Mo (I would if I could get it reasonably done) draft that DE, draft a linebacker with our own #1 pick, and be in pretty good shape on the defense going forward.

Or for you trade Dez junkies, you could draft defense with the acquired #1 pick, and draft a receiver with our first round pick (or vice versa) and go young all the way with our new triplets and trade Dez for a #1. Rinse and repeat that process for two more years.

With the Jets, you are getting a top 10 pick this year, most likely. and a later round pick after that.
 

jwooten15

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,719
Reaction score
39,981
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
For the right price, I'd be find with trading either one of them.

With some of the good fortune we've had (hitting on draft picks), we are a super young team who's window for winning has been opened back up.

So if we were able to trade an aging star QB for draft picks, do it. And if we're able to trade a headache star WR for premium picks, do that also.
 

Dhragon

Deadly Claws of Death
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
1,306
THREE #1's ???- You Sir are cray cray.

If Denver offered even one first rounder and you could work around the cap hit, you'd do it fast. No team is crazy or desperate enough to offer 2 or 3 first rounders for an old injury prone QB no matter how talented.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,061
Reaction score
91,824
LOL.

The compensation for Romo would be small. He's a QB on the last legs of his career and carries a big contract.

Three #1 picks for Romo might be the craziest thing ever uttered on this board in its entire existence.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,371
Reaction score
96,043
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
:facepalm:

Can we have a Romo Zone where these type of threads popping up can go into. Can't wait for the trade deadline to pass. But then we will get the off season ones.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,228
Reaction score
69,646
I don't think anyone knows what the compensation would be. The Vikings gave up a 1st rounder for Sam Bradford. A never was. You just never know how desperate a team is or how delusional they are about their team.

I tend to think Dolphins could be a potential candidate. I think they think far more highly about their team than they should.

The Romo decision is a tough one. I've been of the belief that when he comes back he should get his job back. But I thought this team would just be getting by. Even if we were .500 the decision would be tough. You'd be in the position to let your young guys develop chemistry with each other.

But this team is 5-1 and these guys are acting like they have been playing together their whole careers. Like veterans. Its scary how good and how fast this all happened. And as much of a fan of Romo I am.........there's no logical reasoning for bringing him back. Just not any at all.
 
Last edited:

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
24,656
Reaction score
29,990
I don't think there's any question but what Romo would be more of a value to the Cowboys franchise as our QB, whether it be either as a backup or a starter -- surely not in a trade. What he'd stand to bring in a highly unlikely trade probably wouldn't be enough to compensate for his loss. In the event Prescott went down with an injury, he could fill that vacancy far more capably than any other QB on our roster. He could easily prove very valuable during the playoffs, dare I say beyond, if Dak went down.
 
Last edited:

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,228
Reaction score
69,646
This zone is confused
Either Romo is a top tier QB that's worth everything or he's broken completely & not worth it

That's the prevalent theme

Because no one really knows what Romo is and people are hoping that some team will be willing to figure out it by throwing a draft pick to find out. I believe some team will take the risk. Jets should be a crime candidate. They have young qb's that just aren't ready but they need a veteran and if they thought Fitzpatrick was going to get them somewhere this year then they were sadly mistaken.

But then again, they weren't thinking that because they didn't even want to re-sign him for the money he wanted.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,571
Reaction score
12,274
We are not trading Romo. Jerry has respect for loyal vets. If Tony wants to play elsewhere, we'd likely honor that and release him. Simple as that.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
97,482
Reaction score
100,135
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Same as Dez. You trade Romo you trade his big contract but you will need to draft his replacement. Who knows how that can turn out?
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
97,482
Reaction score
100,135
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Someone post some funny gifs.
tony-romo-pegs-david-feherty-in-the-nuts.gif
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,371
Reaction score
96,043
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This zone is confused
Either Romo is a top tier QB that's worth everything or he's broken completely & not worth it

That's the prevalent theme

This place can argue over if a dog likes dog biscuits.....then you will have the tangent arguments....what determines a dog biscuit as well what determines a dog is a dog. And then there will be the people asking if a hot dog is a dog. And those then would say, is a hot hog better with mustard or relish. And then some would want to trade an aging hot dog for sausage.
Oh well......
 

Angus12

Well-Known Member
Messages
667
Reaction score
895
3 first rounders for a 36 year old QB that has had 2 broken collar bones and 2 serious back injuries in the last couple years. Not to mention an assortment of other injuries over the years.

Sure. Sounds legit.
 
Top