Official Dak Prescott Thread **merged**

KJJ said:
I told you a few days ago, provide a quote/post where I said the Giants "would" or "will." You won't find anything...guaranteed! :thumbup:
Click to expand...

You are right. Posting 30 times saying you are worried that the Gints "could" make a SB run isn't same as they "would" make a SB run. You work in Washington DC?
 
Zman5 said:
You are right. Posting 30 times saying you are worried that the Gints "could" make a SB run isn't same as they "would" make a SB run. You work in Washington DC?
Click to expand...

Never posted that 30 times and never picked the Giants to go to the SB...fact! Stop trying to bring politics into this.
 
JeffInDC said:
Keep the other team from scoring.........did Dak give up 34 points on that INT? In fact, GB got NOTHING from that pick......and, threw one BACK to Dallas. Again, your entire premise was THAT PICK cost Dallas the game - a game where they STILL came back to force what SHOULD HAVE BEEN OT......but, the unit THAT IS SUPPOSED TO KEEP THE OTHER TEAM FROM SCORING (your 1st fact) still found a way to give up a 36 yard pass on 3rd and 20 to set up the winning FG.......but, guess that was Dak's fault too. I'm glad you and all the other Dak haters know more about football than even all the great players, coaches, talent evaluators, etc......in this league.
Click to expand...

It cost us between 3-7 points.

How many points did we need with 0:03 left in the game to stay alive or win?

Weird...3-7 points.
 
Man...I get that QBs don't want to be running QBs in the NFL to be successful but there were so many opportunities for Dak to take off for some big gains. Moving forward, he has to embrace that ability he has and the coaches need to tell him that it's okay to use your legs. He moved the chains on a few 3rd down runs but he could have had so much more. Especially that final 3rd down, the middle of the field was right there for him.
 
Dak played well for his first playoff game. But I hate to say it he's an almost player just like Romo. That last drive proved it. Got down to the 39 yard line and just stopped and we settled for 3. Can't do that and leave time vs elite players . Dak is an almost player until he proves other wise.
 
Pessimist_cowboy said:
Dak played well for his first playoff game. But I hate to say it he's an almost player just like Romo. That last drive proved it. Got down to the 39 yard line and just stopped and we settled for 3. Can't do that and leave time vs elite players . Dak is an almost player until he proves other wise.
Click to expand...
He has a lot more poise than Romo and he's not even able to rent a car yet. Relax.
 
Pessimist_cowboy said:
Dak played well for his first playoff game. But I hate to say it he's an almost player just like Romo. That last drive proved it. Got down to the 39 yard line and just stopped and we settled for 3. Can't do that and leave time vs elite players . Dak is an almost player until he proves other wise.
Click to expand...

Hell, this is an "almost" team until proven otherwise.
 
65fastback2plus2 said:
It cost us between 3-7 points.

How many points did we need with 0:03 left in the game to stay alive or win?

Weird...3-7 points.
Click to expand...

You win dude.......that one play cost us SO MUCH MORE than a 36 yard pass on a 3rd and 20 OR the very first GB possession of the game where they went 3 and out - except one of our lazy *** defenders decided to jog off the field and get a 12 men on the field penalty (resulted in a TD).......OR Jason Witten whiffing on a block that first drive that led to a sack......OR the Dline that generated NO pressure allowing Rodgers to pick the secondary apart.

Yeah, it was THAT ONE PLAY THAT RESULTED IN 0 POINTS FOR BOTH TEAMS that decided the game.:facepalm:
 
I think Dak played well. Other than that very questionable pass in the red zone, he played well. No complaints with him. His individual play didn't cost the game.

That slow start was a killer and that was the team as a whole.
 
People were calling for Tony Romo when the Cowboys were down 21-3. Turns out they were wrong.
 
We can have Dak, hell.. even Rodgers in our team.. with this PATHETIC head coach and front office.. we are not going ti be a winning franchise EVER
 
Darkhound said:
We can have Dak, hell.. even Rodgers in our team.. with this PATHETIC head coach and front office.. we are not going ti be a winning franchise EVER
Click to expand...
This team wins a Super Bowl with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback. Calm down.
 
Pessimist_cowboy said:
Yeah that poise got us one and done .
Click to expand...
It also got us a franchise quarterback with a career 106 passer rating who is also 22 years old.

I'm not sure why this is so hard for you to understand. It's not hard. This team is COMPLETELY different than the one two years ago. The Cowboys look like they found key pieces at multiple positions this year including a FRANCHISE QUARTERBACK with a 4th round pick.

They used a Compensatory fourth round pick to get a first round bye in the playoffs. If you don't see that as progress, I suggest you reevaluate your understanding of progress.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

Total: 7,306 (members: 36, guests: 7,270)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,658
Messages
13,824,757
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top