News: PFT: Trump says NFL will “go to hell” if it doesn’t change

Status
Not open for further replies.

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
35,685
Reaction score
27,237
You want examples of Trump disavowing hate groups? Seems like a project you can handle. Thursday Football is still on.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Trump+disavows.&FORM=HDRSC3

Take your pick.

"I don't want to energize the group, and I disavow the group," Trump told a group of New York Times reporters and columnists during a meeting at the newspaper's headquarters in New York.
"It's not a group I want to energize, and if they are energized, I want to look into it and find out why," he added, according to one of the Times reporters in the room, Michael Grynbaum.

When has he done the bolded?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
35,685
Reaction score
27,237
Protestors- law abiding Americans that didn't want Robert E Lee statue torn down......victims and fine people

Show evidence of these people and lol at blaming antifa for most of the violence.

And the day after the UVA rally they had their permit pulled because they were not supposed to march on a college campus.
 
Last edited:

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
35,685
Reaction score
27,237
The timeline after the Charlottesville murder was hilarious.

Sunday: Excuse making for ***** and claims that there were fine people there.
Monday: Condemning *****.
Tuesday: back to the excuse making.

You guys of course fixate on Monday's quotes.

Then it was Trump in the primaries where he claimed to not know who Duke was. That puts those quotes where he disavows him into perfect context. If you do not realize that he is pandering to white supremacists you are delusional.
 

Floatyworm

The Labeled One
Messages
21,297
Reaction score
19,285
Trump will go down in history as THE worst president in the history of America.

It was clear early on well before the election that whoever won the election either Trump/Clinton WE as the American people were going to be the losers.

Hillary's agenda was "to be the first woman president". Not much else was discussed to really know where she stood on key issues.

With Trump, people thought having a "businessman" at the helm would ensure a better economic situation for everyone..............people either forgot or didn't know that this "businessman" has filed corporate bankruptcy 4 times and received bailout money back in the late 2000's.

The popular votes are only significant in local and state elections.........in a presidential election our vote really is meaningless except for our feel good moments by thinking that our vote really matters..........the electoral college exists so that the powers that be can control who wins the election regardless of how we vote.

I've always thought that we need to disolve the republican and democratic parties and vote for the best candidate and eliminating straight ticket voting.

Trump will go down as the worst President according to the Liberial media..I think he is gonna be the best guy this nation has ever had....if the crazy libtards don't kill him first. Won't shock me to see him get re-elected in a landslide...and then the liberials will act like the Russians rigged the election again.:laugh:

You just can't listen to the media anymore. It's all liberial controlled. You gotta think for yourself...and see the situation for what it is...and how the media is trying to spin it. That's the key.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
35,685
Reaction score
27,237
Trump will go down as the worst President according to the Liberial media..I think he is gonna be the best guy this nation has ever had....if the crazy libtards don't kill him first. Won't shock me to see him get re-elected in a landslide...and then the liberials will act like the Russians rigged the election again.:laugh:

You just can't listen to the media anymore. It's all liberial controlled. You gotta think for yourself...and see the situation for what it is...and how the media is trying to spin it. That's the key.

So where do you get your news from?
 

chagus

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,693
Reaction score
2,579
hammer-and-nail.jpg
Trump will go down in history as THE worst president in the history of America.

It was clear early on well before the election that whoever won the election either Trump/Clinton WE as the American people were going to be the losers.

Hillary's agenda was "to be the first woman president". Not much else was discussed to really know where she stood on key issues.

With Trump, people thought having a "businessman" at the helm would ensure a better economic situation for everyone..............people either forgot or didn't know that this "businessman" has filed corporate bankruptcy 4 times and received bailout money back in the late 2000's.

The popular votes are only significant in local and state elections.........in a presidential election our vote really is meaningless except for our feel good moments by thinking that our vote really matters..........the electoral college exists so that the powers that be can control who wins the election regardless of how we vote.

I've always thought that we need to disolve the republican and democratic parties and vote for the best candidate and eliminating straight ticket voting.
NAILED IT.
 

chagus

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,693
Reaction score
2,579
You know whats REALLY ***** UP??? There are ***** in the USA!!!!!!!
 

Cmac

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,104
Reaction score
8,122
Trump will go down as the worst President according to the Liberial media..I think he is gonna be the best guy this nation has ever had....if the crazy libtards don't kill him first. Won't shock me to see him get re-elected in a landslide...and then the liberials will act like the Russians rigged the election again.:laugh:

You just can't listen to the media anymore. It's all liberial controlled. You gotta think for yourself...and see the situation for what it is...and how the media is trying to spin it. That's the key.
45 should really know where he's going.......if things don't change.
 

cowboy_ron

You Can't Fix Stupid
Messages
15,356
Reaction score
24,300
Trump will go down as the worst President according to the Liberial media..I think he is gonna be the best guy this nation has ever had....if the crazy libtards don't kill him first. Won't shock me to see him get re-elected in a landslide...and then the liberials will act like the Russians rigged the election again.:laugh:

You just can't listen to the media anymore. It's all liberial controlled. You gotta think for yourself...and see the situation for what it is...and how the media is trying to spin it. That's the key.
I'm neither liberal, republican, nor democrat, I'm simply an American as well as a Veteran that very much cares about this country.
 

Dodger12

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
3,532
Either way, I'm done with this. If you want to believe what you do, then no amount of facts are going to change your mind. I hope you see the light at some point, and I will pray for you and everyone else in a cloud of delusion (which often includes Trump supporters).

You can't communicate with some folks so why even try? Everything has to be split along certain lines. There is no middle ground. Folks are going to believe what they want, especially about the POTUS, regardless of the fact he denounced these organizations many years prior to him ever running for office and had done so consistently and still does so to this day. But the liberal press keeps asking. You're far more patient than me.....
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,413
Reaction score
12,158
When you had that column of ***** marching on the UVA campus and the following day. Look over the thread and find it. I shouldn't have to hold your hand.

Oh, I see what you did. You focus one the one thing (tiki torches) as if that is the entirety of the events. Typical.

A single witness (from "VICE" no less, appearing on CNN to boot - Cooper even shows poor objectivity in your video by showing comments by someone talking about a video, and then saying they'll play the video, and then showing a different video than the person talked about.), witnessing one aspect of the entire events. Bravo. You really made no point there at all. The events of that weekend were spread out, and it would be impossible for her to see all aspects of it, especially if they're just going around following their subjects (the white supremacists).

The fact is, that just sheer probability alone indicates there would be some good people there who did not belong to white supremacist groups, and did not march with them either.

Furthermore, let's assume you were correct, and supposed that in the extremely unlikely event occurred where there were absolutely no fine people there, all that simply means is that Trump was in error about who was present (he tends to be wrong on details fairly often as it is). It would still be crystal clear what he meant to say, and that was not to say white supremacists were fine people.

If I provide a quote from someone (quoted in the NYT) who attended due to the statue and says they have no ties to any of those groups and isn't for them or white supremacist, would you accept that as evidence? That's about on part with what you've provided.
 

Kevinicus

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,413
Reaction score
12,158
You can't communicate with some folks so why even try? Everything has to be split along certain lines. There is no middle ground. Folks are going to believe what they want, especially about the POTUS, regardless of the fact he denounced these organizations many years prior to him ever running for office and had done so consistently and still does so to this day. But the liberal press keeps asking. You're far more patient than me.....

You're right. I know. I even continued after I said I would stop. Something I need to work on, I guess. I don't know why I keep going when others won't listen, and will eventually resort to insults (as has already been done in this thread).
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,077
Reaction score
41,060
You can't communicate with some folks so why even try? Everything has to be split along certain lines. There is no middle ground. Folks are going to believe what they want, especially about the POTUS, regardless of the fact he denounced these organizations many years prior to him ever running for office and had done so consistently and still does so to this day. But the liberal press keeps asking. You're far more patient than me.....

Then why did he hire Bannon who led the alt-right Briebart website? Why did he say there are some real fine *****? Why does he call women pigs and they bleed from wherever? Why did he say “She was married but I moved on her like a *****? Why did he mock John McCain for getting captured?
 

Dodger12

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
3,532
Why did he say there are some real fine *****?

You will re-word everything to fit your narrative. It's intellectual dishonesty. Either that, or you just accept what some folks say as fact. Saying that there were some "fine people" among the neo-***** is far different than claiming there are some "fine *****." The man has disavowed these groups over and over again and did so at a time when he wasn't even running for office. Unlike the previous guy in office who only disavowed his radical associations when he was running for President.

The rest of the other gibberish I really couldn't care about except for the McCain comment. He was dead wrong.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,077
Reaction score
41,060
Then why did he hire Bannon who led the alt-right Briebart website? Why did he say there are some real fine *****? Why does he call women pigs and they bleed from wherever? Why did he say “She was married but I moved on her like a *****? Why did he mock John McCain for getting captured?
You will re-word everything to fit your narrative. It's intellectual dishonesty. Either that, or you just accept what some folks say as fact. Saying that there were some "fine people" among the neo-***** is far different than claiming there are some "fine *****." The man has disavowed these groups over and over again and did so at a time when he wasn't even running for office. Unlike the previous guy in office who only disavowed his radical associations when he was running for President.

The rest of the other gibberish I really couldn't care about except for the McCain comment. He was dead wrong.

If he's disavowed them over and over then why did airmen spray paint the n word at the Air Force academy? Why did public figures in Israel, Germany, the United Kingdom and elsewhere condem him for laying blame on "both sides"? Why did Paul Ryan immediately say "We must be clear. White Supremacy is repulsive. This bigotry is counter productive to all this country stands for. THERE CAN BE NO MORAL AMBIGUITY."?
 

Dodger12

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
3,532
If he's disavowed them over and over then why did airmen spray paint the n word at the Air Force academy? Why did public figures in Israel, Germany, the United Kingdom and elsewhere condem him for laying blame on "both sides"? Why did Paul Ryan immediately say "We must be clear. White Supremacy is repulsive. This bigotry is counter productive to all this country stands for. THERE CAN BE NO MORAL AMBIGUITY."?

Is this really a serious question(s)? The man has been clear. If that's not good enough for you or some politicians in Germany or anywhere else, I couldn't care less. And does the man really have to answer why an airman spray painted the N-word at the academy?

As for the "other side," they showed up with helmets, clubs, face coverings, etc. Bad things were bound to happen when people come looking for a fight. I could be wrong, but the one side might have gotten a permit to protest? Either way, this idea of violence to silence voices on either side is moronic.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,077
Reaction score
41,060
Is this really a serious question(s)? The man has been clear. If that's not good enough for you or some politicians in Germany or anywhere else, I couldn't care less. And does the man really have to answer why an airman spray painted the N-word at the academy?

As for the "other side," they showed up with helmets, clubs, face coverings, etc. Bad things were bound to happen when people come looking for a fight. I could be wrong, but the one side might have gotten a permit to protest? Either way, this idea of violence to silence voices on either side is moronic.

One side was promoting racism and bigotry. The other side was protesting against racism and bigotry. We all know what side you stand on.
 

Dodger12

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
3,532
One side was promoting racism and bigotry. The other side was protesting against racism and bigotry. We all know what side you stand on.

Sure, keep labeling. It's all you got. But it's really because of folks like you that that these issues will never get solved. You're too divisive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top