FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,063
- Reaction score
- 27,417
The team's got the best player in the draft. It worked!
There's your examples, where are mine? Where are the examples of what Garrett's meaningless wins have done for anyone other than him?
I do think it's amusing that you care so much about what the paid employees might think that you'd run your business around it. Anybody who would stop doing their job could find another one elsewhere. If you're letting the inmates run the asylum, you're sure as hell not winning anything.
But wait, they're "moribund franchises" despite the fact that both have won championships more recently than this one? That's the point. Yiu want to try to disparage them while the Cowboys look worse.
The coaching staff? Yeah, I absolutely would. You're simply wasting yet another year with a proven loser as your head coach. 7-plus years backs me up on that. That's provable. What's not provable is that making that change would make things worse.
I've already shown you that the teams got what they wanted, the top players in the draft. You haven't shown me one thing that Garrett's meaningless wins have gotten this team?
I love you, Stash, but I could never work for you. Worker morale is important for productivity.
How exactly does the Bucs and Colts winning championships when they were not tanking make tanking a good idea. I get that you loathe the Cowboys franchise right now but try and at least argue the issue here. We are arguing about whether or not tanking is a good idea or not.
So it was provable.
I already pointed out to you that what I meant by "worked" was turning the franchise around. Before I could understand that it was unclear but since this is now the third time I have pointed it out, your just being goofy. There are no examples of teams tanking and winning playoff games in the next few years.