Whatever!! Kiss .. ...
Cowboys would never get that sort of leeway.It's becoming tradition, they need to allow it like they do the Lambeau leap.
So?Handing Washington a net 50 yards and keeping them alive in a game we MUST win is incredibly stupid despite the outcome.
Maybe, but it would've taken a lot longer, if they did.They would have scored anyway.
Actually, it was specifically stated that using the kettle as a prop is against the rules.If they were warned, that's different, but the celebration rule does not have anything in it that would penalize a player for doing what Elliott did, and there have been plenty of celebrations that have been overlooked that actually violate the rule (such as celebrating on the Cowboys' midfield star).
Et Tu?Maybe, but it would've taken a lot longer, if they did.
Yes. If we had a kicker who could still kick it out of the end zone from farther back, I'd be fine with it. But that could have cost us the game.Et Tu?
You're dead to me!Yes. If we had a kicker who could still kick it out of the end zone from farther back, I'd be fine with it. But that could have cost us the game.
Actually, it was specifically stated that using the kettle as a prop is against the rules.

Maybe the difference is that he never actually touched the kettle himself....but okay, the money was a prop. Maybe they considered it a donation?Funny thing is Zeke used $21 as a prop also and it wasn't flagged.

Good question.Question.
Who was the guy wearing the NFL vest that gave Zeke 21 Dollars
Why was that not ruled a prop?
It seemed set up by the league.
Maybe in the case of Cooper's celebration, because the goal post was never touched, it can't technically be considered a prop?I found this that supports what you're saying, but technically it appears that Amare's celebration should have been a penalty, too, as well as other celebrations such as the player who used the TV camera.
Here's what I found:
Ezekiel Elliott's jump into a Salvation Army kettle would still draw a penalty this season, even after the NFL's decision in May to relax its celebration rules.
Elliott's spontaneous leap, which came during the Dallas Cowboys' Week 14 victory over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, is featured in a video that the league is showing all players and coaches during training camp.
The relaxed ruled allow players to use the ball but nothing else as a prop. In the Elliott scenario, the kettle is considered a prop.
ESPN earlier reported that "dunking" the ball over the crossbar after a score will remain illegal because it uses the goal post as a prop.
Question.
Who was the guy wearing the NFL vest that gave Zeke 21 Dollars
Why was that not ruled a prop?
It seemed set up by the league.
Maybe in the case of Cooper's celebration, because the goal post was never touched, it can't technically be considered a prop?
