My thoughts. Who is Dak?

[Texas_Pete]

 

[Philmonroe]

Pap, he is "qualified" to be a NFL QB. He still has some areas of improvement. No one can deny that. He may have been rushed into the starting role but he has done well. I think he has 80 TDs and 24 Ints as a career stat. That's a 3:1 margin. In three years, Dak and company have won more games than they have loss. They are also 1-1 in the playoffs.

They beat a hungry, determined team and broke them on a last scrambling TD play. The faces on Eli and Barkley were evidence of this.

I know you don't like Dak and it is not my place to convince you. I just can't understand why people want to see Dak fail than try to support a guy who is still growing into the role of a starting NFL QB playing for our favorite team. Is it too much work to try to do that? Criticism is easy.

1-1 in the playoffs lay off the drugs my man lol. Please with this motherly want to see Dak fail bs. Just because someone says he is avg or worse that doesn't mean they want to see him fail. Find these post of people that say they want him to fail or are they just saying he isn't good. I don't see folks wanting him to fail to the detriment of the Boys. They must be in a sub forum it don't have access to.

 

[Texas_Pete]

I think today stated this is Prescott's team.

Crazy in a way, but that is what the message said.

Now how all the errant passes, poor pocket awareness and failure to understand coverages factor into that is anyone's guess.

I've learned to accept the good and the bad with Dak. He put the team on his shoulders and overcame: no running game, no pro bowlers at center, LG or LT, and Jack Rabbit pretty much held Coop in check.

He hit Jarwin for 3 TDs, Hurns had a big catch, and of course the game winner with Beastly.

It's funny because when the Gnats scored, I wasn't even sweating it because Dak somehow some way plays at his best in those situations. He came thru again today.

Dak has us at 9-3 in close games. These are gut checks. Playing in these close games will bode well for us in the playoffs.

 

[boysfanperiod]

1-1 in the playoffs lay off the drugs my man lol. Please with this motherly want to see Dak fail bs. Just because someone says he is avg or worse that doesn't mean they want to see him fail. Find these post of people that say they want him to fail or are they just saying he isn't good. I don't see folks wanting him to fail to the detriment of the Boys. They must be in a sub forum it don't have access to.

Ok, but I wasn't talking to you! I made a mistake because it happened to be GB that we loss to in both 2014 and 2016.

Address me correctly. I'm not a man! Thanks. Not on drugs. Only silly posters say that bs! Now, go night night.

 

[Bob-Lillys-War]

 

[Dale]

Nice numbers for Dak but who makes these stats up? Why 8 points or less? Why not 7 or 3 or 10 or tied game?

I assume 8 points or less is defined as a close game due to it being a one-possession point differential.

 

[bodi]

yea but how do you DAK miss a throw to wide open A Cooper - I mean none of the good QB's would miss that throw

can you see Brees or Ben missing that

 

[Philmonroe]

Ok, but I wasn't talking to you! I made a mistake because it happened to be GB that we loss to in both 2014 and 2016.

Address me correctly. I'm not a man! Thanks. Not on drugs. Only silly posters say that bs! Now, go night night.

Ok, but you weren't talking to anybody we are all typing replies here. This is also a messageboard so that I wasn't replying to you business isn't really applicable here. No blank you made a mistake and I made fun of it but you being sensitive took it as some aggressive personal attack when I even added the lol. Online insecurity is real. As far as addressing you I will address you like address everybody else no special treatment over here. If it makes you feel better to say something as common on drugs is some thing silly posters say please continue to say that. It makes me no difference just please stop being sooooo sensitive its not that serious.

 

[boysfanperiod]

Ok, but you weren't talking to anybody we are all typing replies here. This is also a messageboard so that I wasn't replying to you business isn't really applicable here. No blank you made a mistake and I made fun of it but you being sensitive took it as some aggressive personal attack when I even added the lol. Online insecurity is real. As far as addressing you I will address you like address everybody else no special treatment over here. If it makes you feel better to say something as common on drugs is some thing silly posters say please continue to say that. It makes me no difference just please stop being sooooo sensitive its not that serious.

LOL You thought I was being sensitive. No baby, you got me all wrong. I'm more aggressive than sensitive. Sounds like you're the one being sensitive since you want to throw out words.

 

[Tabascocat]

Ok, but you weren't talking to anybody we are all typing replies here. This is also a messageboard so that I wasn't replying to you business isn't really applicable here. No blank you made a mistake and I made fun of it but you being sensitive took it as some aggressive personal attack when I even added the lol. Online insecurity is real. As far as addressing you I will address you like address everybody else no special treatment over here. If it makes you feel better to say something as common on drugs is some thing silly posters say please continue to say that. It makes me no difference just please stop being sooooo sensitive its not that serious.

Dude, never tell a woman to stop being sensitive

I gather that you are NOT married

 

[Philmonroe]

LOL You thought I was being sensitive. No baby, you got me all wrong. I'm more aggressive than sensitive. Sounds like you're the one being sensitive.

I know you were being sensitive and its nothing you can do to change that fact. All this address me properly and other junk over me doing the online equivalent of playing around about the 1-1 record. Hell now that you for some reason needed to let me know you're a woman the second part wasn't even far fetched about motherly talk regarding how you talked about Dak. Again if parroting me doing the whole I call you sensitive so you feel you need to call me sensitive works for you please do it.

 

[boysfanperiod]

Dude, never tell a woman to stop being sensitive

I gather that you are NOT married

Happy wife, happy life!

 

[mmohican29]

Dak seems to be in his 2016 groove and shaken the ghosts of last years atlanta game. I see him playing a game like he did in the 2016 playoff game against green bay. If he does, the seahawks game will be his 1st playoff victory as he has the defense to help him out this time.

Exactly why I said Dak should throw it 50x in a post the other day.

He/we needed this. He is capable. He wins games. Period. If he finds that groove from 2016, all things are possible.

Huge performance- he carried the team today against a Divisional Rival who wanted to pin an L on him badly. That was probably NYG's best game of the year, OBJ or not. Wasn't enough.

I've been down on him all year but today I saw signs of real growth. And really good throws. If he makes throws like today next week, we win.

 

[Tabascocat]

Happy wife, happy life!

That is my code

 

[Philmonroe]

Dude, never tell a woman to stop being sensitive

I gather that you are NOT married

I don't treat anyone different. Make or female you make a mountain out of an ant hill I'm calling you sensitive and I want my friends family to call me out too when I'm doing the same. I was just joking and it was made into some stuff I say to other posters constantly without all the extra address me properly like I called my commanding officer a clown or something smh. You're correct I'm not married but I wouldn't date or marry a woman that I can't be real with and vice versa.

 

[AlienBoy]

yea but how do you DAK miss a throw to wide open A Cooper - I mean none of the good QB's would miss that throw

can you see Brees or Ben missing that

Here you go:

 

[boysfanperiod]

I know you were being sensitive and its nothing you can do to change that fact. All this address me properly and other junk over me doing the online equivalent of playing around about the 1-1 record. Hell now that you for some reason needed to let me know you're a woman the second part wasn't even far fetched about motherly talk regarding how you talked about Dak. Again if parroting me doing the whole I call you sensitive so you feel you need to call me sensitive works for you please do it.

You can believe what you want to believe. It is not a "fact." It is an opinion that you perceive of me. Perception is not the same thing as a fact since it has to do with subjectivity or that thing called POV. I always say "I'm a woman." This is not new. It is a habit from a 2006 Cowboys board where some of the male posters had some sexist ideas about women and football. Besides, my username doesn't exactly allude to it.

Do you want an apology because you're not going to get one. Just because you put LOL on something doesn't make it humorous or sarcasm. I don't mind a joke if it's funny but it wasn't. But since you were playing around Ok. Haha! Are you appeased now? I get aggressive but I'm never 'sensitive' on this board. It is what it is, a forum for diverse voices.

I'm not even going to address the "motherly talk" because it's just a ridiculous notion that wanting someone to succeed makes you somehow "motherly." Shoot, half the board is then and I'm including a lot of male posters in that number.

 

[Philmonroe]

You can believe what you want to believe. It is not a "fact." It is an opinion that you perceive of me. Perception is not the same thing as a fact since it has to do with subjectivity or that thing called POV. I always say "I'm a woman." This is not new. It is a habit from a 2006 Cowboys board where some of the male posters had some sexist ideas about women and football. Besides, my username doesn't exactly allude to it.

Do you want an apology because you're not going to get one. Just because you put LOL on something doesn't make it humorous or sarcasm. I don't mind a joke if it's funny but it wasn't. But since you were playing around Ok. Haha! Are you appeased now? I get aggressive but I'm never 'sensitive' on this board. It is what it is, a forum for diverse voices.

I'm not even going to address the "motherly talk" because it's just a ridiculous notion that wanting someone to succeed makes you somehow "motherly." Shoot, half the board is then and I'm including a lot of male posters in that number.

of course I can believe what I want same as you. Thanks for telling me nothing new. Did I ask for an apology? The answer to that question is the answer to yours. Yes just because you put lol on something doesn't make something humorous or sarcasm but if you weren't insecure about your mistake you could see it as such. You felt insecure in this instance and took it a way it wasn't meant. Why would I be appeased about you being sensitive as poo? That's amessageboard flaw about yourself you need to fix. Its nothing you can do to change my views and I'm sure vice versa.

You shouldn't address the motherly talk because like a lot of lost you twist expletive into stuff to make it something it wasn't. Nobody said wanting someone to succeed was motherly. Learn to read with understanding or hell just read the next sentence after I said motherly that explains exactly why I said motherly. If not you can have @Cowboyz88 to co sign you since he wants to show how much of a good guy he is.

 

[Cowboyz88]

of course I can believe what I want same as you. Thanks for telling me nothing new. Did I ask for an apology? The answer to that question is the answer to yours. Yes just because you put lol on something doesn't make something humorous or sarcasm but if you weren't insecure about your mistake you could see it as such. You felt insecure in this instance and took it a way it wasn't meant. Why would I be appeased about you being sensitive as poo? That's amessageboard flaw about yourself you need to fix. Its nothing you can do to change my views and I'm sure vice versa.

You shouldn't address the motherly talk because like a lot of lost you twist expletive into stuff to make it something it wasn't. Nobody said wanting someone to succeed was motherly. Learn to read with understanding or hell just read the next sentence after I said motherly that explains exactly why I said motherly. If not you can have @Cowboyz88 to co sign you since he wants to show how much of a good guy he is.

Shocked that you’re not married.

Perhaps one day you’ll leave your moms basement.

And you got it right, I am a good guy.

 

[DFWJC]

Before anything that involves stats or accuracy, the thing that jumps out at me is he's a Leader and a Winner. He was drafted in the 4th round, so clearly he needed work. But after 3 yrs, he has had more success and better stats then any QB from his draft.

So while fans can cry and gripe about him not being accurate, him not having pocket awareness. In big games he shows up and wins. In big situations he wins. At the end of games, he wins. What more do fans need? Do we need 400yrds and 4Tds and a loss, or a balanced attack that just wins games? Fantasy football and madden have warped fans brains into thinking just because they do things in a video game that its easy to play in the NFL.

Fans will compare Dak to the guy he took over for, and the favorite quote is "Romo would win a superbowl with this team". NO he wouldnt, he couldnt win a playoff game with one of the best teams in Cowboys history in 2007. They dominated on offense and defense. Dak shows better poise then Romo ever did with the game on the line. That TD pass to Beasley was amazing. And an even better catch. Dak put that ball the only place that would've been completed. It was picture perfect, and what made the catch harder wasnt the placement but Beasley lack of height. So he had to reach. A Taller WR catches it easy. But great catch by Beasley.

I know people are going to say Dak missed deep throws today that would've been TDs. SO WHAT!! he took the team to TDs on those drives anyways. He missed a guy but overcame that and drove the team down and scored TDs on perfect reads to Jarwin and the game winner to Beasley.

He balled out today without Tyron and Martin and Elliot. The game was in Daks hands and he nailed it. The defense was abused but Dak put the team on his back and won the game. The game winner, he alludes a sack and throws it while taking the hit with a perfect placement, when the team needed it. Last down, he either makes that throw or they lose. And the outcome was the same as its been his whole professional career. A win when the games on the line and they need a TD. Daks doing something the team hasnt had since Aikman. A QB who could win you the game late. And no Romo never gave them that.

I’ll ignore your Romo comments (because you just can never help yourself) and move on and AGREE that I think Dak shows ...sometimes...thats he's a gamer.

Just please dont confuse todays game as anything remotely close to tnat.
Was maybe the LEAST big game of the entire season.
This game had no bearing at all....on anything