Trashin playoff QB's subpar play does Dak no justice

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,635
Reaction score
62,876
Point is every QB that was left in the playoffs yesterday is better than Dak hands down. Not to mention despite the loses, non of those QB's disappointed, not even Mahomes who we know had he gotten that ball back in overtime, he more than likely makes history against the GOAT.

And bash Goff all you want, when that guy falls behind and he has to make the more difficult accurate throws, that guy is spot on whether he throws for 100 or 400 yards every time. Is dak that consistant....NO!

Brees and Brady? Enough said!

Alot of our fans are being hypocrites when it comes to Dak and these other QB's having average games.

These guys in the playoffs do what they need to do to get the job done while dak folds under these pressures.

Dak is not on any of their levels nor is he playoff or championship material. Stop being jealous because Goff has lead his team to the big dance while Dak has contributed to sending our team home, giving the fans nothing to look forward to.

Accept the fact that the QBs you guys are bashing are still talented enough to amp it up or turn it down and still win.

We wont sniff a NFC title or SB until we find a better passer we can develope like Goff and Mahomes.

Despite coaching I think any of those guys are talented enough to work with the talent we have just fine.
I am happy for you.
I really am.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,384
Reaction score
44,174
It’s ignorance along with other things I’m forbidden to mention here to completely eliminate Dak, the quarterback of our team from any recognition or credit for the team doing so well in the regular season. What’s wrong with you?

But conversely it’s not completely hypocritical to trot out dimwitted stats like QB W/L record?
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,243
Reaction score
3,618
LOL..hell ya! That's the famous "Laker Bro". We need people to "bro-up" more around here!

I had to do some reading on it and read the interview with the Laker Bros. Funny stuff. I had no idea it’s actually reversed. It’s definitely funnier reversed....
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,906
Reaction score
35,142
None of that is true. Dak was responsible for 15 or so of those sacks can't recall the exact number) that still hangs 40 sacks on the OL, we were not the #1 rushing team, we were 10th, while Zeke was the leading rusher, we didn't dominate the LOS as evidenced by our struggles to punch in TDs into the EZ.

You give Romo all the credit for the OL, but don't credit Sparano and Houck for actually coaching the OL and did a great job.

You also conveniently did not mention what Woodson also said about Dak.....

“When he’s on the sideline, they believe in him,” Woodson continued. “I can’t say the same thing about Tony Romo when he was here a few years ago. I can’t say that this team and these players thought, 'Ok, well Romo’s going to bail us out,' or 'we’re down by fourteen, Romo’s going to do this,' or 'we’re up by fourteen, Romo’s not going to turn the ball over.' No, no, no. They didn’t believe. There is something about (Dak) in that locker room that they all rally behind.”

“I believe at some point, Dak Prescott will be a championship quarterback because he has the intangibles to do so.”


You pick and choose what you want to believe and make up the rest and others are calling you out.

1.

Yeah, I’m sure the OL couldn’t block even though they had the number 1 rusher in the league. The only reason we weren’t higher is because we benched Zeke in the final game and rushed only 12 times and had Dak throw over 44 times. So Who exactly is picking and choosing? So I’m suppose to believe your opinion that 14 of Checkdown Charlie’s sacks were his own fault, the rest the OL even though we were a ‘top rushing’ team and not number 1?

2.

There is nothing to argue about the “it” factor. Darren Woodson clarifier exactkly what he meant in the interview I provided where he says that’s what the team believes in him. I provided the latest video of what Darren Woodson says do spare me, the “one-sided nonsense” argument

We aren’t discussing the “it” factor and this notion that this team didn’t believe in a Romo, even though that is hogwash. Who exactly is playing on the offense that was here when Romo was? Gallup, Cooper, Hurns, Jarwin or a majority of the linemen currently starting this year? What we are discussing is Dak’s ability to be a pocket QB and progression QB, and be accurate per Darren Woodson. So again spare me the nonsense.

3. Further, This team thought the season was effectively over in 2015 when Romo went down and rushed him back to try and get into the playoffs. Butler himself cane out and said he was astonished that Romo was basically the coach. This whole team believed in Romo’s ability to bring them back, because that’s what he actually did.

It’s clear who picks and chooses what they want.
 
Last edited:

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Always good to see my dude up in the house causing a ruckus.
We'd probably be lethal at a bar...
Wives and girlfriends would walk out in disgust and we'll still be putting skins on walls.

I can dig it.
What’s up My Guy? You know I’m not letting these snitching bs hypocrites run me away. They go behind my back to rat me out and get me benched. But I always come back with a vengeance. Can’t keep a real man down. No matter how hard they try.
As for us being lethal in a bar. Hell yea! We’d be assassins! Lol. But it would be the cowardly men running out and the ladies would stay because they’d love to be in the presence of True Alpha Males!!!
:yourock:
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
But conversely it’s not completely hypocritical to trot out dimwitted stats like QB W/L record?
Nothing dimwitted about that. It’s more important than 500 yard games with 3 interceptions. Including the game ending turnover. I’d take 200 yard games with a win anytime over gaudy stats in a loss.
How old are you?
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,906
Reaction score
35,142
Nonsense is believing Romo had that much affect , Guess he made the Defense and kicker probowlers He blocked for Barber when he pounded teams into submission at the end of games What a hoot
Tony made a positive impact yes absolutely but it is exaggerating to say he made everyone a probowler

He had good players on those early teams and they should have gone farther

Why not just admit your facts were wrong and fake the L... I mean isn’t it embarrassing enough that you tried to argue that Parcells developer this OL into the force it was, when they were actually pretty bad with Parcells and Leonard Davis wasn’t even here with Parcells and was a bust for seven years?
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Why not just admit your facts were wrong and fake the L... I mean isn’t it embarrassing enough that you tried to argue that Parcells developer this OL into the force it was, when they were actually pretty bad with Parcells and Leonard Davis wasn’t even here with Parcells and was a bust for seven years?
What is with you and this “take the L” bs? Being a clown who declares himself the winner is a definite indication that he’s actually losing. :facepalm:
 

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,635
Reaction score
62,876
What’s up My Guy? You know I’m not letting these snitching bs hypocrites run me away. They go behind my back to rat me out and get me benched. But I always come back with a vengeance. Can’t keep a real man down. No matter how hard they try.
As for us being lethal in a bar. Hell yea! We’d be assassins! Lol. But it would be the cowardly men running out and the ladies would stay because they’d love to be in the presence of True Alpha Males!!!
:yourock:
You got ben...?
...
The irony in this? I'm listening to Hit the Road Jack right this second.
Eyes everywhere...
Thankfully @Reality is a good man with a solid process that has worked so far.

In the End, though we may get scarred, we don't leave the field of battle.
Here we are and we ain't going anywhere!
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,906
Reaction score
35,142
What is with you and this “take the L” bs? Being a clown who declares himself the winner is a definite indication that he’s actually losing. :facepalm:

Or it could be just advice to actually take an L gracefully when they are taking Ls as exemplified by their ‘facts’ that are wrong..
 

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,635
Reaction score
62,876
Why not just admit your facts were wrong and fake the L... I mean isn’t it embarrassing enough that you tried to argue that Parcells developer this OL into the force it was, when they were actually pretty bad with Parcells and Leonard Davis wasn’t even here with Parcells and was a bust for seven years?
I was writing and listening to some good music and going places and then Jaws happened.

You jerk.
Now I have to find another pool to play in, or embrace the feeding frenzy.
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,957
Reaction score
7,108
I had to do some reading on it and read the interview with the Laker Bros. Funny stuff. I had no idea it’s actually reversed. It’s definitely funnier reversed....
Yeah, man!

The Laker Bros (original)
PowerlessUnfinishedHorsechestnutleafminer-max-1mb.gif

The T-Rex dude
TREX.gif


And the *** guy
4687481.gif


Are my top-3 fan responses of all time. Oh the pageantry..
 

Roadtrip635

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,021
Reaction score
26,954
1.

Yeah, I’m sure the OL couldn’t block even though they had the number 1 rusher in the league. The only reason we weren’t higher is because we benched Zeke in the final game and rushed only 12 times and had Dak throw over 44 times. So Who exactly is picking and choosing? So I’m suppose to believe your opinion that 14 of Checkdown Charlie’s sacks were his own fault, the rest the OL because we were a ‘top rushing’ team and not number 1, even though the final game was a wash because they wanted Dak to throw the ball.

2.

There is nothing to argue about the “it” factor. Darren Woodson clarifier exactkly what he meant in the interview I provided where he says that’s what the team believes in him, but that’s a load of crock.
I provided the latest video of what Darren Woodson says do spare me, the “I’m one-sides nonsense”.

We aren’t discussing the “it” factor and this notion that this team didn’t believe in a Romo based on the fact Dak game is hogwash. What we are discussing is Dak’s ability to be a pocket QB and progression QB, and be accurate per Darren Woodson. So again spare me the nonsense.

3. Further, This team thought the season was effectively over in 2015 when Romo went down and rushed him back to try and get into the playoffs. Butler himself cane out and said he was astonished that Romo was basically the coach. This whole team believed in Romo’s ability to bring them back, because that’s what he actually did.

It’s clear who picks and chooses what they want.


You got busted.

I didn't make up the number and wasn't my opinion (like your 56 were Dak's fault) that was charged sacks to Dak that came from PFF. Great OLs just don't give up that much pressure no matter how you want to spin it. Run blocking and pass pro are different and like I stated, even with the leading rusher, the OL still struggled to win at the point of attack near the goal line. That is not dominating as you said.

#1 vs #10 is a fair amount of difference. Again you're making up "facts"

You were the one that brought up Woodson's word as gospel, but didn't tell the whole story. You purposely left out the parts you didn't like. First Woodson's word was gospel, but now you want to start quoting Brice Butler from 2015 as part of your argument, for a year that Dak wasn't even on the team? ....lol Yes you are picking and choosing. Flip flop, flip flop.

I'm still waiting how you explain how Romo coached his OL to being one of the best, since you gave zero credit to the coaches, it was all because of Romo...... lol


2afec647d2e645195ca35cc29817821e818f71b52e4fc608b6155d8f185e016e.jpg
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,906
Reaction score
35,142
You got busted.

I didn't make up the number and wasn't my opinion (like your 56 were Dak's fault) that was charged sacks to Dak that came from PFF. Great OLs just don't give up that much pressure no matter how you want to spin it. Run blocking and pass pro are different and like I stated, even with the leading rusher, the OL still struggled to win at the point of attack near the goal line. That is not dominating as you said.

#1 vs #10 is a fair amount of difference. Again you're making up "facts"

You were the one that brought up Woodson's word as gospel, but didn't tell the whole story. You purposely left out the parts you didn't like. First Woodson's word was gospel, but now you want to start quoting Brice Butler from 2015 as part of your argument, for a year that Dak wasn't even on the team? ....lol Yes you are picking and choosing. Flip flop, flip flop.

I'm still waiting how you explain how Romo coached his OL to being one of the best, since you gave zero credit to the coaches, it was all because of Romo...... lol


2afec647d2e645195ca35cc29817821e818f71b52e4fc608b6155d8f185e016e.jpg

Nobody got busted other than you, but pretend you won an argument by patting yourself on the back. Saying Dallas was a top ten rushing team with the best rusher in the league and one game Dallas didn’t even run the ball, still doesn’t prove the OL sucked and that Checkdown Charlie’s didn’t sacked himself into plenty of the 56 sacks which was unheard of for so many other scrubs that even played on this team, including guys like Weeden and Cassell.
 
Top