Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,099
- Reaction score
- 20,290
I would do it if it were offered too. Maybe we could throw sign Herschel Walker then throw him in the deal too.
Dexter Coakley.
I would do it if it were offered too. Maybe we could throw sign Herschel Walker then throw him in the deal too.
I would do it if it were offered too. Maybe we could throw sign Herschel Walker then throw him in the deal too.
Generally Agreed. But like the 3rd post someone made mention of getting 2 first rounders for him. I consider that a dumb deal on the other team and would take 2 first rounders any day for an aging player. It'll probably not happen, but that's the kind of trade people have made in the past for someone like Tank.
I would be HIGHLY surprised if someone gave 2 First for Tank, but if they do I'm on that trade like a big dog on a toy poodle.
THEY AIN’T TRADING TANK!!No need to scream. And yeah, they probably are not trading tank, mainly because nobody will probably offer them multiple first rounders for Tank. But you wouldn't trade him for two first round picks?
I wasn’t thrilled qbout the Cooper trade at first either, although like with most things I was willing to at least give it a chance before judging too harshly. But after watching him play I’m pretty happy about the deal.
I share your enthusiasm for the picks, which is why I initially was skeptical about the trade for Cooper. But at the end of the day the point of drafting (and trading) is to build a team, and if you don’t keep a foundation of many of the most solid pieces accumulated in the building process, the building never gets completed. In other words, younger and cheaper can be a good thing, but it can’t be the only thing. Younger and cheaper, while an important part of the process, is also less proven and carries a risk of ending up with lesser quality than a proven player. So there has to be a mix of strong foundational pieces, even if they are costly, and younger cheaper people being developed.I'm a big fan of picks. We've been hitting them well, and they're *so* much cheaper.
Amari is 14 just for next year, then projection around 17 for a new contract.
Amari for 64mil for 4 years plus a free half year vs. our first round picks since 2010 for 10mil + 5th year option.
I like the picks better. Not all of them, but most, and for a number of them, I like the player better straight up.
The pick gives me a first rounder at 10mil plus 50mil+ leftover to get someone else in free agency, or extend one of our own. It's just better. And I've got no complaints about Cooper's play.
Outside of Law we really don't have much. Can't depend on RG. Let's say we ship Law for a couple of 1's, nothing top 15. and RG relapse. This team is doom. If anything I'm willing to ship out Jones.
Yes, and you show up like a moth to the flame. Thanks for dropping in. It always nice to see what people think who are riding the short bus. Thumbs up on diversity of opinions.
I don't care if a trade offer comes the day after RG is featured on the cover of High Times. If they're offering 2 first round picks, I'm taking it.
There's nobody on the Cowboys I wouldn't trade for 2 firsts.
I don't care if a trade offer comes the day after RG is featured on the cover of High Times. If they're offering 2 first round picks, I'm taking it.
There's nobody on the Cowboys I wouldn't trade for 2 firsts.
Foles has an out on the option but they can franchise him.Thanks.
But why would the Eagles not keep Foles yet the Cowboys would keep Lawrence?
How is this determined? The eagles picked up Foles option. Why would they do that if they dont intend to keep him?
I would say it more likely the Cowboys decided Lawrence isnt worth the cost and they dont intend to keep him. We havent made any commitment to him like the Eagles have Foles.
(all hypothetical of course. D Law isnt going anywhere)
Where will the production cone from? That's the main issue.
What if they trade Wentz..... it is a very easy dodge and not worth talking about....it happens every yearFoles has an out on the option but they can franchise him.
If they franchise him it's not for the purpose of keeping him which is technically against the rules.
No team will keep a backup QB at 25M for the season.
What if they trade Wentz..... it is a very easy dodge and not worth talking about....it happens every year
These trades happen a lot in the NFLTank has zero years on his contract, and would be on a 1 year franchise tag. There are very few times ever where any team has traded 2 first round picks for any player in any situation, and a D-Law type player with a one year franchise tag is not one of those kinds of situations.