Ranched
"We Are Penn State"
- Messages
- 34,885
- Reaction score
- 84,323
Its funny
So your saying the bears would trade for Khalil mack but nobody would trade for tank. ooooookwho is going to trade for tank? who wants 17+ mill a year? and would be his last contract before he is ineffective? why should we trade him? what do we do at DE? and is the draft pick (unknown who at this time) is better than Tank? do you want to win superbowls? or get more draft picks?
KC insiders are talking about the Chiefs going all in this year with Mahomes on his rookie deal. 2 firsts. I hope and pray it happens.
I hate to agree with Mickey Spags but he is right on this. There is no way Tank's agent wants to be the first to sign a deal with all the other DEs that are tagged. He will wait so the others can set the market and then try beat that deal and not the other way around.
All great points.We kinda get 2 next year.....since it is the last year of the CBA we get a Franchise Tag and a Transition Tag
They could FT Dak and Transition Tag BJones( which gives DAL the right to match any offer)
DLawrence will be gone or re-signed... no 3rd FT for him
ACooper most likely will have been extended
Zeke has a 5th year option
JSmith is a RFA
Someone should listen to this man.You don't have to sign the FT to facilitate trade talks...... all the parties can talk and work out long-term deals first.... once all parties are happy they sign the FT and execute the trade and extension
And once the market was set Dez and Demarius Thomas ended up signing the exact same dealThat's exactly it. Dallas is doing with DLaw exactly what they did with Dez Bryant. Use the tag to buy time, see what the exact market rate is (instead of setting the market like the agent wants) and then signing him at the last minute. With Dez's contract it literally came down to the last hour or two.
And once the market was set Dez and Demarius Thomas ended up signing the exact same deal
Maybe were waiting till draft day to trade tank for a first. That gets him off the books. Then we sign our guys. "technically" it makes sense. Otherwise why are we dragging this out.
khlil mack...yes.... Lawrence? would you give up a one for a Lawrence type player right now? be honest....So your saying the bears would trade for Khalil mack but nobody would trade for tank. ooooook
It is better than overpaying a player that disappears for several games at a time and also seems to have constant injuries hampering his play.So we're going to trade the only quality def-lineman we have for a 1st round pick which is not guaranteed to become a stud player (Remember Taco) ya that makes total sense....
He started out as the number 1 free agent available before the tag. If they gave 2 1st for mack we should get 1 1st from somebody.khlil mack...yes.... Lawrence? would you give up a one for a Lawrence type player right now? be honest....
KC insiders are talking about the Chiefs going all in this year with Mahomes on his rookie deal. 2 firsts. I hope and pray it happens.
hey could FT Dak and Transition Tag BJones( which gives DAL the right to match any offer)
the proof is in the pudding...... lets see if anyone willlHe started out as the number 1 free agent available before the tag. If they gave 2 1st for mack we should get 1 1st from somebody.
Maybe were waiting till draft day to trade tank for a first. That gets him off the books. Then we sign our guys. "technically" it makes sense. Otherwise why are we dragging this out.