northerncowboynation
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,925
- Reaction score
- 6,303
So your saying 30M is totally out of the question? Call your shot.
You read what I said
So your saying 30M is totally out of the question? Call your shot.
You don’t draft a QB in the 1st round and hope he fits a system. You draft a QB in the 1st round and build the team around his strengths. Saying “he doesn’t fit the system” is saying he sucks.
Keenum and Mahomes weren't "pro-style" only in the sense that the offense wasn't exactly "pro-style", but that was more about schemes than individual style of play. Both Keenum and Mahomes were pocket passers.
No it doesn't mean they would have a lot better record. Cardinals had more problems than just the quarterback position. If he had a season like Baker Mayfield did his team still would've sucked but he would've been in the running for ROY. They aren't trading him if he has that type of year lat year.
And Rosen fits EXACTLY what Kingsbury should want. He's big, mobile and accurate. There is more there than he just wants Murray.
[QUOTE="ABQCOWBOY, post: 9171689, member: 318"
What? A proven QB with 3 years of experience ,32-16 wins/ losses and a proven leader versus Rosen. Sometimes I just shake my head even at mods! I suppose even mods are entitled to (insert comment here)
Keenum didn't run a Pro-style Offense, neither did Mahomes.
How many ROY QBs have you seen that didn't have a better record then 3-13?
I've already said that the Cards had more problems then just a QB so again, what is your point? Is it to repeat things I've already said?
If Mayfield had the OL the Cards had, he would not have been ROY. It's as simple as that. Rosen doesn't fit Kingsbury's Offense at all. Have you ever even seen Rosen play? He is not mobile, he is exactly the opposite of a mobile QB, but whatever, your story, you tell it.
This is just like yesterday - you are saying you disagree by repeating what I said as if it has a different meaning when you type it. I said they didn't run a pro style offense, and you say you disagree because they didn't run a pro style offense. If I say 2+2=4, are you going to tell me you disagree because 2+2=4?
You are throwing up a smoke screen - not sure why unless you somehow think it's important to appear to potential readers as if you've made a point. I never said, or suggested, Kingsbury ran a pro-style offense in college. I said he had success both with QBs who were running QBs and pocket passers. The "pocket" isn't something that exists only in a "pro-style" system, and "pocket passer" doesn't mean someone who is incapable of throwing from any point on the field that is outside the pocket. Again, it merely means passing from the pocket is where the bulk of their production comes from and what the majority of their success is based on.
Those AZ teams sure do know how to treat a coach right...After having just fired Steve Wilks, the first year HC who was the DC from Cleveland before coming to Az.
Those AZ teams sure do know how to treat a coach right...
What are you talking about? Sometimes I shake my head a posters. I am not a Mod and you are lost in what you think you understand. Show me one place where I say that Rosen is preferable to Dak. Lucky I'm not a Mod, otherwise, who knows about your post.
And, again, Kingsbury doesn't run an offense that is pinned to one style of QB. Keenum, Manziel and Mahomes were all very different QB's, and Kingsbury was able to be successful with all 3. The moral of the story is that what fits Kingsbury's system is talent. If he dumps Rosen it will be because he doesn't think Rosen has it.
I thought there was a point that he was...lol, you're not a mod. Forgive me
lol, you're not a mod? Forgive me all to pieces
I thought there was a point that he was...
Am I wrong @ABQCOWBOY ?
That's it... I'm going to the real source:
Am I wrong @ABQcowboyJR ?
No. I am not a Mod. Forgiveness is earned, get to work.
The forgiveness part I could care less about
Yeah, I used to be a Mod for several years. Now, I'm just a regular poster. Maybe not as smart as some of you though.
![]()