DandyDon52
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,518
- Reaction score
- 15,552
As for the 18 game season, I kinda like it, requires more strategy,by coaches and FO.
uh oh could hurt dallas the most!
uh oh could hurt dallas the most!
Leave it alone. the NFL made 15 billion last season, approximately. How much is enough?
https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/07/12/nfl-18-game-schedule-suggestion-player-limitWith a 16 game limit per player.
Who said anything about a salary cap increase? The players aren't getting paid more. They are getting paid just the same for the same amount of time played. That's why there is a proposed game limit.
Hmmmm.
It's actually an intriguing concept and it really puts an added layer of strategy for coaches/front office.
Such as, would you play Dak in the 16 games you were most comfortable winning and then sit him for what would be your two toughest games, or would you play Rush or White for what would be your two easiest games, hoping they would be able to pull out a win?
The cap space would get bigger, yes but the current revenue sharing agreement is locked at 47%,16 games according to the current CBA. So this plan can't be executed until at least 2022. A new revenue-sharing agreement, new CBA... then and only then can this happen.Players get a percent of NFL Revenue.
If total revenue increases then the amount the players get increases.
What is this word, "enough"?Leave it alone. the NFL made 15 billion last season, approximately. How much is enough?
Good. Adios.I'm no longer watching until they let fans call a few plays a game via a phone app.
It’s a shame you have to post this. Anyone with a lick of common sense would know that the players are also going to benefit.Players get a percent of NFL Revenue.
If total revenue increases then the amount the players get increases.
Case in point. I just don’t get it. The players are going to benefit as well as the owners. Duh. All it takes is agreement and it can happen now.The cap space would get bigger, yes but the current revenue sharing agreement is locked at 47%,16 games according to the current CBA. So this plan can't be executed until at least 2022. A new revenue-sharing agreement, new CBA... then and only then can this happen.
The CBA isn't going to be renewed until 2022, so no this is not happening at least until then.Case in point. I just don’t get it. The players are going to benefit as well as the owners. Duh. All it takes is agreement and it can happen now.
I agree that the fans and the NFL wouldn't want it. But I can't imagine why teams wouldn't do it.I don’t see anyway teams would plan for the 18th game to be a rest game. Nor would fans want that.
Fans and the NFL want there to be some games that have playoffs on the line the last week of the season.
Sure really bad teams and really good teams it wouldn’t matter, but teams that have something to gain, wouldn’t want to be stuck having to sit starters.
It’s already in the CBA. Just never been carried out. Why do you think the owners made this proposal?The CBA isn't going to be renewed until 2022, so no this is not happening at least until then.
The cap space would get bigger, yes but the current revenue sharing agreement is locked at 47%,16 games according to the current CBA. So this plan can't be executed until at least 2022. A new revenue-sharing agreement, new CBA... then and only then can this happen.