pitt33
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,754
- Reaction score
- 6,400
No he won’t.Dak will be the highest paid player whether you like it or not.
No he won’t.Dak will be the highest paid player whether you like it or not.
Yeah, I’m not buying this either.How are Ben and Skin supposed to know this? Much less how far apart he is with the team relative to where they are with Zeke and Cooper? I don't think so.
Yes, of course. I don’t want to lose either of them.IMO only , they both need each other.................................They make quite a formidable duo , and I don't believe either one would be as good without the other.........................
RB’s aren’t measured by wins of the team .Dak is 4-3 without Zeke. Let’s see how Zeke does if Dak sits for 7 games.
Something tells me Cooper Rush isn’t going 4-3 no matter what. And that something is called “reality.”
We’re not discussing which player is better at their respective position.RB’s aren’t measured by wins of the team .
And if Dak was among the league leaders in passing and the team didn’t fare as well then we’d know it wasn’t on Dak.
That’s how we separate greatness from less than great teams. Personal performance!
Yes, of course. I don’t want to lose either of them.
But since Dak’s success is so often handcuffed to Zeke, it should be mentioned that Zeke’s success is even more dependent on Dak.
We’d be lucky to go 2-5 if Dak misses 7 games this year, but Dak is 4-3 in his career without Zeke.
Nobody wins squat with a talented RB and trash at QB. Ask Barry Sanders.
No, but Herschel’s rushing prowess didn’t do jack for the team’s W/L record, now did it?Did we think Herschel was the reason we were 3-13 while he was leading the league in rushing?
Yea but the Lions didn’t pay their average to below average QB near the top of the league.Yes, of course. I don’t want to lose either of them.
But since Dak’s success is so often handcuffed to Zeke, it should be mentioned that Zeke’s success is even more dependent on Dak.
We’d be lucky to go 2-5 if Dak misses 7 games this year, but Dak is 4-3 in his career without Zeke.
Nobody wins squat with a talented RB and trash at QB. Ask Barry Sanders.
You’re obviously missing my point. LolNo, but Herschel’s rushing prowess didn’t do jack for the team’s W/L record, now did it?
Way to make my point for me.
QB importance >>>>>>>>>> RB importance
Do you think Dak can carry this team on his arm?We’re not discussing which player is better at their respective position.
We’re discussing which player is more important when it comes to WINS AND LOSSES.
Dak is MUCH more important than Zeke is in that regard.
No, but Herschel’s rushing prowess didn’t do jack for the team’s W/L record, now did it?
Way to make my point for me.
QB importance >>>>>>>>>> RB importance
Dark Diggler
If they’re of equal importance, they’ll make equal pay.Sorry buddy , but I believe Aikman and Emmitt were equal..........................That's pretty much how I view the Dak/Zeke partnership..........Having Smith/Elliot gives you an 8 or 9 man box , obviously ; but you also need the QB that can capitalize on that...................With Cooper , Gallup and Cobb , I believe Prescott will............................
Yea but the Lions didn’t pay their average to below average QB near the top of the league.
We understand Dak is important to our offense but he’s more effective with Elite surrounding support.
You’re not making much sense. At least not if you’re trying to refute my argument.Yea but the Lions didn’t pay their average to below average QB near the top of the league.
We understand Dak is important to our offense but he’s more effective with Elite surrounding support.
If they’re of equal importance, they’ll make equal pay.
Hmm, let’s revisit that when they’re signed to new deals.
Dak is a top 10-12 QB who’s young and still getting better.Do you think Dak can carry this team on his arm?