Twitter: Since 2017, Dak is 5-9 vs winning teams

[visionary]

11-13 hell of a lot better than 5-9. That's 6-2 that was excluded.

That would put him right in line with others. A winning team wins more games than they lose, so saying 11-13 against winning teams is "pitiful" highlights how ignorant you are.

This makes total sense because going below .500 against winning teams is how you win SBs. Does Dak get a mulligan in the playoffs that other QBs don’t? If not, how will he win 3-4 consecutive games against winning playoff teams?

 

[Section446]

Average QB...

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

What others?

I am generally curious at this point. What are the W/L records against winning teams for guys like Rodgers and Brees and other high level QBs?

I ask because I honestly don't know.

Dak at 11-13 in comparison

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

There it is for you


I knew you would have trouble finding it because it doesnt fit your agenda. 11-13 vs winning teams. Pitiful

Lol "pitiful"



HOLD THIS L

 

[khiladi]

Good thing Dakota never called out anyone else about INT's

Dak knows a lot about throwing over another guys head.

 

[crashintonickdm]

I’m all for missing the playoffs

good coaches who get the most out of people are the difference. Garrett has proven he can’t do it. It’s been 8.5 years

 

[crashintonickdm]

Dak talking **** about romo.

then against that date suggests week 17 in 2012 which was the worst interception to end a game I’ve ever seen.

#thegarrettera

 

[Silver N Blue]

What if Amari didn't drop that ball and scored the touchdown?

The Dak hate after that game is astronomically stupid. He wasn't great, but you can only blame 1 INT on him. Like Tony, he's playing on a team that actively hurts his chances.

Obviously going to be a big play but he still didn’t lead the receiver as he often has issues with. He had two great passes yesterday leading his receiver to a spot, the one to Cobb and Zeke. He had some other good passes but frequently has issues leading his receiver. Now don’t get me wrong here Cooper still should have caught the ball but his drop issues leave him out of the elite status talk for him.

 

[Sydla]

Dak at 11-13 in comparison

I am confused, one says Rodgers is 17-26 against teams with a winning record since 2012 and the other says he is 7-24. I must be reading it wrong.

Is there an actual stats website that tracks these things?

 

[Ken]

0 yards on third down?

First 2 he was sacked.
3rd he was hit has he threw.
4th was broken up by a corner who was all over Cooper and no one else was remotely open.
5th, he scrambled for a first.
6th- 3rd and 18...threw at Zeke's feet. Bad play, first i have seen on 3rd down.
7th- 3rd and 10 from GB 15. Gets away from a sack and runs for 5 yards. Didn't seem like anyone was open, but don't have all 22 yet.

That's it. Not nearly what Dan tries to make it seem like.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

I am confused, one says Rodgers is 17-26 against teams with a winning record since 2012 and the other says he is 7-24. I must be reading it wrong.

Is there an actual stats website that tracks these things?

Think most are using pfref

and i can't find a split/advanced split vs winning teams

 

[Sydla]

What if Amari didn't drop that ball and scored the touchdown?

The Dak hate after that game is astronomically stupid. He wasn't great, but you can only blame 1 INT on him. Like Tony, he's playing on a team that actively hurts his chances.

What if Smith doesn't put a hands to the face of Fleming? Dak has another interception. What if King doesn't have hands of stone and drop another easy interception?

The fact is if you are going to play this game of this interception wasn't his fault and that interception wasn't his fault, you have to be fair and point out the balls that he threw that should have been intercepted that were awful throws.

 

[Sydla]

Think most are using pfref

and i can't find a split/advanced split vs winning teams

I tried to locate it too and no one seems to have it, even Pro Football Reference. Oh well. I sure as hell ain't gonna go count it myself for all these QBs. LOL.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

First 2 he was sacked.
3rd he was hit has he threw.
4th was broken up by a corner who was all over Cooper and no one else was remotely open.
5th, he scrambled for a first.
6th- 3rd and 18...threw at Zeke's feet. Bad play, first i have seen on 3rd down.
7th- 3rd and 10 from GB 15. Gets away from a sack and runs for 5 yards. Didn't seem like anyone was open, but don't have all 22 yet.

That's it. Not nearly what Dan tries to make it seem like.

So Dak did have yards on 3rd down. Interesting

 

[WillieBeamen]

Lol "pitiful"



HOLD THIS L

Pitiful is your “math”


You are done here

 

[Irvin88_4life]

I keep seeing some say Dak just ain't good but yet is in the top 3-5 in almost every passing stat this season. He is 1 TD away from leading the league in passing TDs, less than 50 yards from being second in the league in passing yards, number 1 in the league in yards per attempt, number 1 in QBR, top 5 in rating.

If that's what a QB that ain't good gives us than I'm sold

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Pitiful is your “math”


You are done here

Ahhh I can admit when I make a small mental error.

You? Deflect deflect deflect

Again, HOLD THAT L LITTLE BUDDY

 

[Brax]

Except it's not an overused stat when wins and losses has been cited MULTIPLE TIMES as to why Dak is a really good QB. You can't know suddenly claim wins and losses is a team thing when one has used wins and losses to justify why they think Dak is an elite-ish QB and deserving of a huge contract.

Note, I am not suggesting you are one of those types - I am just speaking generally here about the concept of wins and losses as used on this board.

Wins are Daks losses are the teams and everyone else's, not hard to understand, just seems to be the way for some and it's a view that will not change sadly.

 

[Sydla]

I keep seeing some say Dak just ain't good but yet is in the top 3-5 in almost every passing stat this season. He is 1 TD away from leading the league in passing TDs, less than 50 yards from being second in the league in passing yards, number 1 in the league in yards per attempt, number 1 in QBR, top 5 in rating.

If that's what a QB that ain't good gives us than I'm sold

But surely you will acknowledge that he's played 3 bad teams and 2 good ones and that his stats might be inflated because he played three poor teams. His performance against the Saints and Packers certainly wasn't great by any stretch, right?

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

I like Clayton Thorson. Looking forward to seeing him in next year's preseason. Just saying.