We’ll try it again:
Show me where I said anything about Dak getting “massacred”
Literally, my first response to you was “no argument on Romo’s punishment”. How is that confusing to you? Please explain.
Or admit you were wrong. Again. Somehow I think you’re the type of person that has a problem with this. Even on the internet
Your quote;
“2. Your claim is that Dak is getting massacred beyond what other QBs faced, especially Romo. Provide the stats that he does, when he’s basically had a clean pocket the whole season.”
Your other quote “I didn’t accuse you of anything”
Do you see how you don’t make sense?
1. No, that wasn’t your ‘first response’. Your first response was a question where my post was addressing this claim that Dak was getting massacred unfairly, which included an example where Dak got a BOGUS call of favoritism, and people were trying to leverage it like Romo. I was saying it’s also a CROCK, BEFORE YOU EVEN ASKED THE QUESTION, because Dak hardly gets togched by defenders. So people have nothing to compare it to and are just trying to ‘pump the legend of Dak’.
2. You then address me directly homie directly with this question and I said NO he didn’t get hit and the announcers said the same thing, while STICKING TO MY POST.
3. Your response, without any proof, was that he did get hit as if I’m just going to believe your word. You then you went on this speech about how you loved Romo. Then you asked for STATS that prove Dak hasn’t been getting pressure and I have them, but yet, you are sitting here acting like you only kept to one subject. You also tried to argue that call Dak got was meaningless, because the game was supposedly out of hand among other nonsensical reasons, which basically affirms your argued that Dak did get a call he shouldn’t have. You further tried to justify it by saying Rodgers would have gotten the same call, which doesn’t prove favoritism for Rodgers as opposed to Dak, but the exact opposite.
4. I then provided you the stats about Dak not getting pressured and then asked you got stats to provide the claim Dak is getting hit unfairly as opposed to the rest of the league, for you to establish some sort of claim he’s being ‘targeted’ especially In light of how little he actually gets pressured to the rest of the league so you could make some judgmeny.
5. Now you look even more like you don’t know what you are talking, because you don’t even know the difference between ‘contact’ and ‘hit’, while pretending you never asked me questions like “where are the stats”.
and here we are, you patting yourself in the back thinking you won this debate.