Hope Dak's a cerebral QB

garyo1954

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
4,470
You're splitting hairs.

I tend to rely on coaches. Joe Judge is expected to run the Earhardt-Perkins with the Giants. From one of their sites......


Concepts
Efficient language
One of the biggest drawbacks in the West Coast and Air Coryell offenses are their elongated play calls. The call in the huddle could be "Jet Dart 368 Y-Flat Train on one." That's a standard Coryell play and the language is too descriptive and wordy for a fast-paced offense. Each part of the playcall refers to different players and it contains a lot of irrelevant information for many players on the field.

The Erhardt-Perkins offense is different to other offenses because it describes concepts rather than individual routes. Take the "368 Y-Flat" part of the Coryell playcall listed above for example. The Erhardt-Perkins play call for that would be two words and could read something like "Circus/Kings." "Circus" would refer to the route combinations on the left side of the field, and "Kings" would tell receivers on the right what to do. I wrote about basic route combinations before, and that should give you some idea of how this works. This offense uses a huge variety of combinations between two and three receivers to get the most of the space that they're working in. Additionally, it's important to note that their play call names don't refer to the common combination names and merely act as a signifier within the team. It's code. It's all code.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,578
Reaction score
4,432
You guys need to stop this stereotype QB facade. Dak Prescott has a Master's Degree and the GPA to apply for a Doctorate.

But what does that have to do with football that uses X, O, ---> and <----- to communicate. Learning a NFL offense at QB is overrated. I think someone with a Masters Degree can catch on to the X and O offense that the cerebral pride of Kilin, MS, Brett Farve, mastered and learned.
 

sean10mm

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,000
The EP comparisons are irrelevant anyway, Garrett wasn't running the Patriots offense last I checked.
 

garyo1954

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
4,470
Here's the article with Brian DaBoll....

About two-thirds down the page you'll see where he says.....

"So when Daboll wants to go to no huddle or operate in two-minute situations, the play call and process from call to snap is more efficient because of the structure of the playbook."
 

garyo1954

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
4,470
The EP comparisons are irrelevant anyway, Garrett wasn't running the Patriots offense last I checked.

I'm out of this mess. You haven't been keeping up to well my friend. Go look what Dallas was running. Then give us a holla!
 

cowboyed

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,431
Reaction score
1,582
You're splitting hairs.

I tend to rely on coaches. Joe Judge is expected to run the Earhardt-Perkins with the Giants. From one of their sites......


Concepts
Efficient language
One of the biggest drawbacks in the West Coast and Air Coryell offenses are their elongated play calls. The call in the huddle could be "Jet Dart 368 Y-Flat Train on one." That's a standard Coryell play and the language is too descriptive and wordy for a fast-paced offense. Each part of the playcall refers to different players and it contains a lot of irrelevant information for many players on the field.

The Erhardt-Perkins offense is different to other offenses because it describes concepts rather than individual routes. Take the "368 Y-Flat" part of the Coryell playcall listed above for example. The Erhardt-Perkins play call for that would be two words and could read something like "Circus/Kings." "Circus" would refer to the route combinations on the left side of the field, and "Kings" would tell receivers on the right what to do. I wrote about basic route combinations before, and that should give you some idea of how this works. This offense uses a huge variety of combinations between two and three receivers to get the most of the space that they're working in. Additionally, it's important to note that their play call names don't refer to the common combination names and merely act as a signifier within the team. It's code. It's all code.
So, we have to wait another 5 or 6 years to expect Dak to understand the offense?

Let's send Dak to auctioneer school then....
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
If a bonehead like Farve was able to understand the concepts, I don't think it's going to be an issue for Dak.

Farve was not stupid. I mean, he did a lot of what he did, based on his unbelievable skills. I mean, Farve had as many gifts as any QB I've ever seen, in terms of being able to throw a football so he could get away with things other QBs could not. But think about it, how many INTs did Favre throw, especially in big games.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,477
Reaction score
69,933
I see we got another one that assumes anybody with a college degree no matter what its in is "smart enough" smh. He got them degrees that if he wasn't an athlete you'd be like he went to school for that stop it. Them degrees don't have jack expletive to do with playing football so I need people to stop this smart business when they aren't even related.
Looks like we got some Dallas Can Academy alumni right here lol.
 

garyo1954

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
4,470
It’s going over my head......

Sorry.

So, we have to wait another 5 or 6 years to expect Dak to understand the offense?

Five years later we have threads like.....

"Give Dak a chance he's still learning the offense!"
"Dak is still improving! He's $65 Million QB, pay the man!"

Better?
 

Philmonroe

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,587
Reaction score
4,968
Looks like we got some Dallas Can Academy alumni right here lol.
Sounds good sir but you can post your degree to show me how much better you think you're doing than me in this category. Otherwise you just out here riding Daks jock sir
 
Top