Letting Beasley leave was benefit, not cost.
Not sure what parallel universe the original poster is living in, but in the current timeline the rest of us occupy, replacing Beasley with a cheaper Cobb was such a good move, it belongs on a list of our best front office moves lately. We easily upgraded and saved money at the same time.
We let Cobb walk too now, but that doesn't retroactively make Beasley more valuable or tempting. If we wanted to be locked into that kind of money for a slot guy, we'd have given it to keep Cobb, who was *much* better on top of also being younger.
Beasley is Central Casting's idea of a guy who would be scrappy and full of heart, but he wasn't. He was a diva by the end of his time here and, don't forget, his career here started with us having to hold his hand and babysit him to literally talk him out of retiring during camp as a rookie. Not too much heart in this game.
Certain Cowboys fans want to write off production when it comes from someone like Cobb, yet they want to romanticize the contributions by guys who look like Beasley because they've concocted some narrative in their head about how he's the kind of scrappy engine that powers winning. It's nonsense. He never won here, and he was perfectly happy with it when he was getting his stats. The second he hit the open market, he happily made a beeline to a 6-10 team in an armpit of a city because they were offering the most money and promising the most empty targets.