You eventually sell the product. But before you sell the product the plan is to buy low and start to make profit."Buying" a product (say Dak?) and "selling" a product (say The Cowboys) are totally different things. You BUY low and SELL high. At least rich people do anyway. So it's not really a great analogy, but anyway...
The bottom line is yes....Jerry would only pay "what it's worth". The fact that Jerry signs the contract would dictate that.
But...it doesn't mean it's his preferred worth. Well pretty sure anyway.
And GB.
He did not have a bad back at that point in time, and that wasn't the highest in the league...so?
I don't know where he was ranked money wise but I remember everyone saying we overpaid.
You got me wrong. You think just because I find some "criticism"
Ridiculous. You read what you want and skip over the rest because it doesn't suit your crusade agenda.
I have MANY posts supporting Dak. I also want who the coaches see as the best player to start. No free passes. So that means Dalton deserves a fair shot. If isn't better than Dak...I am perfectly fine going with Dak. I;d like to see him improve on some specific plays....but I don;t want him gone just because either.
Your shtick is getting tiresome. You want to put it all in nice tidy box so you can't rant about.
Right? Get me Trent Dilfer if he can get us to a Super Bowl. Stats are nice but mean nothing (to me) without wins!
Because why?
There's always more to Dak's performance then stats, it's how was his decision making etc.
Uhh... there's an etc to that...the etc has to be addressed.
Because it was below market for a QB of his caliber.
It was the 2nd largest QB contract with the most guarantees at the time, correct?
