cowboyec
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 33,579
- Reaction score
- 40,418
they won't.That's why we should make it a priority
they haven't.
they won't.That's why we should make it a priority
They already use bothand the same can be said for the 4-3. It comes down to personnel and execution of the players. Dallas has went down the 3-4 before and did not work out so great. I think what Quinn is doing will continue to produce for the defense. I really do not see him going to traditional 4-3 or 3-4.
Micah is who he is because he’s not faced up on a OT a majority of the time. If these posters were coaches he would be getting washed out repeatedly head up on an OT the amount of times these guys wish him to be.If you knew that nickel was base , as you claim, this wouldn’t be nearly as important as you think it is.
the key to parsons being as successful as he was last season, is moving him around and not letting the defense key in on him so easily. The posters on this board that want to stick him in one place and leave him there will make him worse than what he is
Yes, we don't want to define him, just use him all over based on matchups. I hear many say make him a pass rusher, he already rushes plenty, but also affects the game in other ways.I was in favor of him just being a pass rusher but Parsons said himself he considers himself a chest piece. The Vikings game he was strictly a middle linebacker and played like Ray Lewis in his prime. Then you watch him rush the passer from edge and notice how he changes the game. The Cowboys hit a home run with this one.
I have watched your boy Zion from Boston College. He would be a good pick at 24. I actually like his film better then the center from Iowa.Yes, we don't want to define him, just use him all over based on matchups. I hear many say make him a pass rusher, he already rushes plenty, but also affects the game in other ways.
They’re so dumb lolMicah is who he is because he’s not faced up on a OT a majority of the time. If these posters were coaches he would be getting washed out repeatedly head up on an OT the amount of times these guys wish him to be.
He had a sack and 4 QB hits in Week 2.Build the scheme around Parsons.
Incredibly it wasn't until Week 3 we seem to realise he could play off the edge full=time if needed
If it was 2002, sure go to a 3-4 and let Parsons shine killing the QB.
But now, nah. I prefer having Parsons being able to line up as the LDE, then ILB, then OLB etc. And the offense has to account for him pass rushing in any lineup
Why not incorporate a 3-4 alignment into a scheme that plays to weaknesses of the opposing offense?
While I don't really disagree on moving to a 3-4 defensive front with Parsons on the roster, I have absolutely no confidence that the above part of you post will happen.I would like to see priority given to drafting an OLB on the other side along with a true Nose Tackle.
Yeah, Linderbaum's size worries me.I have watched your boy Zion from Boston College. He would be a good pick at 24. I actually like his film better then the center from Iowa.
I like him too. A lot actually. Like the versatility and wonder if he can also be an effective tackle.I have watched your boy Zion from Boston College. He would be a good pick at 24. I actually like his film better then the center from Iowa.
He had a sack and 4 QB hits in Week 2.
We probably didn't see it as much in Week 1 because D-Law played. He got more pass rushing opportunities starting in Week 2 after Law was hurt.
While I don't really disagree on moving to a 3-4 defensive front with Parsons on the roster, I have absolutely no confidence that the above part of you post will happen.
We wasted a 8+ years of DeMarcus Ware's career having play across the likes of:
And was "protected" by
- Scott Fujita
- Who was never a passrushing threat (Less than 5 sacks every year in his career)
- Greg Ellis
- A converted DE that had arguably his best years as an 3-4 OLB, even though he was no where near the athlete needed at the position
- Anthony Spencer
- Nicknamed "Almost" Anthony Spencer for a reason
- George Selvie (4-3 DE)
- A career backup that registered a whopping 10 sacks in 2 years with the Cowboys
- LaRoi Glover
- A borderline HOF caliber player who was VASTLY undersized for the NT position
- Jason Ferguson
- Had the size, but at his age and NFL wear and tear by the time we signed him, he was hardly spectacular as a Cowboy
- Jay Ratliff
- The prototypical undersized "1-Gap Nose Tackle", arguably the most oxymoronic position description in NFL history
If, and that's a BIG IF, the Cowboys learned and are willing to get another great Passrushing OLB and a NT that needs to be double teamed on nearly every play, then I'm with you.
Unfortunately, history has shown this to be highly unlikely.
Yes I know we play nickel most of the time, but I think going forward we need to be thinking how we can build the DEF around Parsons. To me, he primarily needs to line up as an OLB in a 3-4 scheme and that is the scheme we need for the next 10 years. I would like to see priority given to drafting an OLB on the other side along with a true Nose Tackle. I am assuming D-Law will not be back and if he does I don't have a lot of confidence he can hold up for a full season. Either way I am not holding back Parsons.
My question is what would the PATS do with someone like Parsons? they would build around him in a scheme best suited to his talents. His best skill his rushing the passer.
Urban (I would bring him back on a cheap deal), Basham come from this scheme and I want players signed who can slot in.
Other teams are now switching to the 3-4 (Raiders, Vikings) so it is very popular now and I know we are a hybrid DEF. But I think primarily we should be building a 3-4.
Don’t know much about the Cowboys insider Bobby Belt but he says the Cowboys were really watching the Northern Iowa tackle. I think the Cowboys might want to go back to the bully offensive line. Something to keep an eye on.Yeah, Linderbaum's size worries me.