Dak vs Jimmy G

Toruk_Makto said:

Click to expand...

doomsday9084 said:

Deserves more than a like.

The market for quarterbacks is simply way out of wack with their true value. Mahomes' deal hasn't really kicked in as of last year but now we are starting to see the impact (Hill). I bet Rodgers is never going to win big getting paid that much.

The reality is that the best time to win is when you have a very good QB still on the tail end of his rookie deal. . . or you have Brady taking a discount.

Its unfortunate that several years of Dak's cheaper deal were taken up paying off dead money for Romo.

Click to expand...

Jarntt said:

I think this perfectly shows how ridiculous some Cowboy fans are towards Dak. The idea that someone thinks Jimmy G is better than Dak just screams agenda or lack of Football knowledge about QB play in the NFL and some notion that other QBs are out there not making any mistakes. Same goes for those who were trying to state Dak was a top 3 or 5 QB when he was rolling. It's like many people base their opinions only on emotion and not what they actually see. Dak is what he is. A good QB, not a great QB. Jimmy G is not a good QB at all.

Click to expand...

Jarntt said:

I think this perfectly shows how ridiculous some Cowboy fans are towards Dak. The idea that someone thinks Jimmy G is better than Dak just screams agenda or lack of Football knowledge about QB play in the NFL and some notion that other QBs are out there not making any mistakes. Same goes for those who were trying to state Dak was a top 3 or 5 QB when he was rolling. It's like many people base their opinions only on emotion and not what they actually see. Dak is what he is. A good QB, not a great QB. Jimmy G is not a good QB at all.

Click to expand...

Northern_Cowboy said:

Hmmm, they played each other in a playoff game this past year..remember? Jimmy G had his team ahead 23-7 going into the 4th quarter our QB did nothing all game and then played catch up after the Niners sat back in the 4th

Click to expand...

MountaineerCowboy said:

I don't mind paying a QB market value like if their talents are also market value.

Mahomes, Rodgers, Brady, Allen, Burrow, Herbert.... Those guys are worth whatever they will be paid.

I'm not a fan of paying a QB just because it's "his turn" to be paid. If your skills don't warrant what you want, then I let someone else assume that risk.

The Browns, believe it or not, played it perfect with Mayfield. He has given them more success then basically any QB they've drafted, but he clearly isn't a great QB. They are not willing to settle for that, so they make a deal and get an actual talented QB, and they're getting rid of Baker.

The Rams played it perfect with Goff. Could you imagine the money Jerry would have given Goff if he lead the Cowboys to the Super Bowl? The Rams didn't fall for that mirage and upgrade big time at QB and are now champions for it.

If Mayfield or Goff was drafted by the Cowboys and had the exact same career they have had thus far they would have one of the biggest contracts in the NFL right now. You'd also have bozos on here defending their play and pretending they are top 10 every single week.

Click to expand...

doomsday9084 said:

Deserves more than a like.

The market for quarterbacks is simply way out of wack with their true value. Mahomes' deal hasn't really kicked in as of last year but now we are starting to see the impact (Hill). I bet Rodgers is never going to win big getting paid that much.

The reality is that the best time to win is when you have a very good QB still on the tail end of his rookie deal. . . or you have Brady taking a discount.

Its unfortunate that several years of Dak's cheaper deal were taken up paying off dead money for Romo.

Click to expand...

CATCH17 said:

Dak but both guys need a lot of great around them to win.


Neither guy wins on their own because they just aren’t capable of it.

Click to expand...

Northern_Cowboy said:

When you are down anywhere from 13-20 points per game at half time....(happens alot to us with Dak because we are LUCKY he puts up 6-10 points on the board in the 1st half)...then you wind up throwing alot in the 2nd half...and when you are still down those same 13-20 points going into the 4th quarter (because we did nothing on offense in the 3rd quarter) the opposing team lets up a little and you get to put up alot of garbage time stats.....Dak throws so much because he gets nothing done until the game is out of hand (usually by halftime) and he tries to play catch up in the 2nd half

Click to expand...

MountaineerCowboy said:

I don't mind paying a QB market value like if their talents are also market value.

Mahomes, Rodgers, Brady, Allen, Burrow, Herbert.... Those guys are worth whatever they will be paid.

I'm not a fan of paying a QB just because it's "his turn" to be paid. If your skills don't warrant what you want, then I let someone else assume that risk.

The Browns, believe it or not, played it perfect with Mayfield. He has given them more success then basically any QB they've drafted, but he clearly isn't a great QB. They are not willing to settle for that, so they make a deal and get an actual talented QB, and they're getting rid of Baker.

The Rams played it perfect with Goff. Could you imagine the money Jerry would have given Goff if he lead the Cowboys to the Super Bowl? The Rams didn't fall for that mirage and upgrade big time at QB and are now champions for it.

If Mayfield or Goff was drafted by the Cowboys and had the exact same career they have had thus far they would have one of the biggest contracts in the NFL right now. You'd also have bozos on here defending their play and pretending they are top 10 every single week.

Click to expand...

CowboysFaninHouston said:

didn't the rams pay goff one of the largest contracts, he played under that contract for one more (or was it two more) years and then got traded. but yeah, good for Rams for going for it and cashing in. maybe Jerry will learn to be a GM someday.

Click to expand...

MountaineerCowboy said:

Goff is QB for life in Dallas if he led us to a Super Bowl like he did the Rams.

Click to expand...

KJJ said:

How many fans would seriously want a QB who’s never had a 4000 yard season and never threw for more than 27 TDs in a season

Click to expand...

KJJ said:

How many fans would seriously want a QB who’s never had a 4000 yard season and never threw for more than 27 TDs in a season and has just undergone shoulder surgery on their throwing shoulder? That’s the QB you would rather have than Dak? Lol

Click to expand...

Northern_Cowboy said:

When you are down anywhere from 13-20 points per game at half time....(happens alot to us with Dak because we are LUCKY he puts up 6-10 points on the board in the 1st half)...then you wind up throwing alot in the 2nd half...and when you are still down those same 13-20 points going into the 4th quarter (because we did nothing on offense in the 3rd quarter) the opposing team lets up a little and you get to put up alot of garbage time stats.....Dak throws so much because he gets nothing done until the game is out of hand (usually by halftime) and he tries to play catch up in the 2nd half

Click to expand...

McKDaddy said:

That isn't what he was asked to do in SF. They win by running, short passes & playing good D.

Whether he could carry a team that relied on him to pass first is a legit question.

Is he a more talented passer? Yes, I think so.

Is he a great decision maker? Especially under pressure? That would seem to be the biggest glitch in his game. It's not the physical that generally separates QB's.

Click to expand...

MountaineerCowboy said:

So, you only care about pretty stats at the end of the season, huh?

Click to expand...