CowboyoWales
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,812
- Reaction score
- 4,183
Not last year he didn't. The whole reason is that a fabulous route runner's wasted on Dak (and KM).... look at the percentages he threw to WR3/4 and TE. We are building a Swiss Army knife of a receiving Corp that helps Dak find someone. It also means we can make in play strategic changes based on defensive schemes.this is a somewhat odd and confusing response to my point. i’m saying i’d rather have had talbot replace gallup (at a fraction of the price) than Amari. if their play style is so similar, it makes more sense to me to have an amari and one, instead of two gallups. not to mention gallup is no longer cheap and also coming off of injury. and just as an aside, Dak has proven quite capable of utilizing Amari over the years.
Last edited: